NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

23-Chem-B2 Environmental Engineering · December 2019

Question 6 of 7: Water Contaminant Characterization, BOD and Sedimentation

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exam 16-Chem-B2, Environmental Engineering — December 2019. 3 hours, Closed-Book Exam with a candidate-prepared 8½×11" double-sided aid sheet. Any five (5) of the seven questions constitute a complete paper (100 marks); all seven are solved below for completeness.

Reference texts: Metcalf & Eddy (Tchobanoglous, Burton, Stensel), Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse, 4th ed.; Davis & Cornwell, Introduction to Environmental Engineering, 5th ed.; Turner, Workbook of Atmospheric Dispersion Estimates, 2nd ed.; Cooper & Alley, Air Pollution Control: A Design Approach, 4th ed.

Problem 6: Water Contaminant Characterization, BOD and Sedimentation (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

(i) Groundwater-under-surface-water-influence contaminants in a farming community

ContaminantTypeTreatment method
Nitrate (NO₃⁻), from fertilizer/manure runoff infiltrating the aquiferChemical Anion-exchange (nitrate-selective resin) or biological denitrification, both sized on the influent nitrate concentration and required removal to meet the drinking-water MAC.
Cryptosporidium/Giardia (oo)cysts, from livestock manure reaching the surface-water-influenced aquiferMicrobiological Granular media filtration (physical removal) followed by UV disinfection (chemically resistant (oo)cysts are inactivated by UV dose even though they resist chlorine).

Measurement confirmation combines a process-performance indicator (continuous turbidity monitoring on the filter effluent, since (oo)cyst removal correlates strongly with turbidity/particle removal) with periodic direct analyte testing (laboratory nitrate analysis by ion chromatography against the maximum acceptable concentration, and UV-dose validation/UV-transmittance monitoring for the disinfection step) — the continuous surrogate catches short-term treatment upsets in near-real time, while the periodic direct analysis confirms the specific health-based limit is actually being met, since neither measurement alone can verify both operational stability and regulatory compliance.

(ii) CBOD₅ test

Given.

QuantityValue
Sample volume (secondary effluent), Vs250 mL
Dilution water added250 mL
Total mixture volume, Vt500 mL
Initial DO, DOi10.0 mg/L
DO after 5 days, DO₅3.0 mg/L
DO after 20 days (stabilized), DO₂₀0.5 mg/L

Find. (a) 5-day CBOD (CBOD₅), mg/L. (b) Ultimate CBOD (L₀), mg/L.

Approach. With nitrification inhibited, all bottle oxygen depletion is carbonaceous demand; dividing by the dilution factor P scales the diluted-bottle depletion back to the demand of the undiluted effluent, and the stabilized 20-day reading is taken directly as the ultimate carbonaceous demand.

  1. Dilution factor.
    $$ P = \frac{V_s}{V_t} = \frac{250}{500} = 0.500 $$
  2. 5-day CBOD.
    $$ \text{CBOD}_5 = \frac{DO_i - DO_5}{P} = \frac{10.0 - 3.0}{0.500} = \boxed{14.00\ \text{mg/L}} $$
  3. Ultimate CBOD.
    $$ L_0 = \frac{DO_i - DO_{20}}{P} = \frac{10.0 - 0.5}{0.500} = \boxed{19.00\ \text{mg/L}} $$
QuantityValue
Dilution factor, P0.500
5-day CBOD, CBOD₅14.00 mg/L
Ultimate CBOD, L₀19.00 mg/L

The ratio CBOD₅/L₀≈0.737 implies a first-order rate constant k≈0.27 d⁻¹ (from L₀(1−e−5k)=CBOD₅), squarely within the typical municipal 0.1–0.3 d⁻¹ range — reported as informational context only and does not change either boxed result.

(iii) Primary sedimentation design parameters

ParameterHow it influences performanceTypical design value
Surface overflow rate (SOR)The upward flow velocity a particle must out-settle to be captured; SOR (not detention time) is the fundamental sizing parameter for an ideal settling basin because capture depends only on the particle's settling velocity relative to the basin's overflow rate, not tank depth.≈ 32–48 m³/m²·d (average flow) for primary clarifiers.
Weir loading rateFlow per unit length of effluent weir; an excessive weir loading rate creates high approach velocities near the weir that can re-entrain and carry over settled/settling floc before it reaches the sludge hopper.≈ 125–500 m³/m·d.
Detention timeAverage hydraulic residence time in the basin; must be long enough for the design particle to actually traverse the basin depth at its settling velocity, and also provides time for flocculation of fine particles into larger, faster-settling aggregates.≈ 1.5–2.5 hours.