23-Chem-B5 Pulp and Paper Technology · Undated paper
Question 6 of 6: Batch-Digester House & Recausticizing Mass Balance
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exam 16-Chem-B5, Pulp and Paper Technology — May 2019. 3 hours,
CLOSED BOOK exam (Casio or Sharp approved calculators only). Per the exam notes, any FIVE of the six questions
constitute a complete paper (only the first five as they appear in the candidate's answer book are marked);
for completeness this solution answers all SIX questions in full. Most parts require an essay-format answer
— clarity and organization of the answer are explicitly marked.
Every specific reconstruction is flagged
inline at the point it is used; the underlying arithmetic for all boxed numbers.
Reference texts: Smook (rev. Kocurek), Handbook for Pulp & Paper Technologists,
4th ed.; Biermann, Handbook of Pulp and Paper Technology, 2nd ed.; Perry's Chemical Engineers'
Handbook, 9th ed. (generic mass/energy-balance and heat-exchanger methods).
Question 6: Batch-Digester House & Recausticizing Mass Balance 20 marks
Find. (1) white liquor volume, L/batch; (2) black liquor volume, L/batch, and its purpose;
(3) brown-stock production rate; (4) recausticizing white-liquor flow (L/min), lime mud (CaCO3)
produced, and the stoichiometric/actual lime (CaO) demand.
Approach. Work one digester's charge from wet-chip volume down to O.D. wood mass, apply
the EA% and L/W definitions to get white- and black-liquor volumes, then scale to a house-wide rate. Parts (3)
and (4) both require a batch (cook) cycle time, which is not stated in the question; per the exam's own Note 1
("if doubt exists…submit a clear statement of any assumptions made"), a typical total batch-digester
cycle time (fill–cook–blow) of 4.0 hours is assumed. For part (4), the recausticizing
white liquor's NaOH/Na2S/Na2CO3 split is backed out from its EA and
sulphidity, the causticizing reaction Na2CO3+Ca(OH)2→2NaOH+CaCO3
(lime slaked in situ, CaO+H2O→Ca(OH)2) fixes the lime-mud stoichiometry, and the
stated lime availability (the fraction of the reburned/quicklime that is actually active CaO) converts the
stoichiometric CaO demand into the ACTUAL raw lime that must be fed to the slaker.
Check
The batch cycle time needed to convert per-batch
quantities into rates is not stated in the question. A representative
hardwood Kraft batch-digester cycle time of 4.0 h (typical range 3–5 h, Smook Ch. 5) is
assumed and used consistently below; any other assumed cycle time would scale parts (3) and (4) proportionally
without changing parts (1)/(2) or the g/L intensities computed in part (4).
Charge mass per digester. Wet-chip volume charged $=0.60\times175=105\ \text{m}^3$, so
$$m_{wet}=105\times285=29{,}925\ \text{kg wet wood/batch}\qquad
m_{OD}=29{,}925\times(1-0.45)=\boxed{16{,}458.75\ \text{kg O.D. wood/batch}}$$
(1) White liquor volume. EA required $=0.180\times16{,}458.75=2962.6\ \text{kg EA}$; at
95 g EA/L:
$$V_{WL}=\frac{2962.6\times1000}{95}=\boxed{31{,}185\ \text{L/batch}}\ (31.2\ \text{m}^3/\text{batch})$$
(2) Black liquor volume. Total liquor required at L/W=4.1 L per kg O.D. wood:
$$V_{total}=4.1\times16{,}458.75=67{,}481\ \text{L/batch}$$
$$V_{BL}=V_{total}-V_{WL}=67{,}481-31{,}185=\boxed{36{,}296\ \text{L/batch}}\ (36.3\ \text{m}^3/\text{batch})$$
The recycled black liquor is added to raise the liquor-to-wood ratio to the level needed for adequate chip
saturation, uniform liquor circulation and heat transfer through the charge — not to add fresh cooking
chemical — while simultaneously returning residual NaOH/Na2S left in that black liquor to
the cook (chemical economy) instead of drawing an equivalent extra volume of fresh white liquor.
(3) Brown-stock production rate. Pulp per batch per digester
$=0.54\times16{,}458.75=8887.7\ \text{kg O.D. pulp}$. With the assumed 4.0 h cycle, the house (6 digesters,
staggered) discharges $6/4.0=1.5$ batches/h:
$$\dot m_{pulp}=8887.7\times1.5=13{,}332\ \text{kg/h}=\boxed{320.0\ \text{O.D. tonnes/day}}\ (\approx356\ \text{ADMT/day at 90\% AD})$$
(4b) White-liquor NaOH/Na2S/Na2CO3 split. With
EA=NaOH+0.5Na2S (as Na2O) and sulphidity S=Na2S/(NaOH+Na2S):
$$\text{NaOH}=\frac{93}{1+0.5(0.28/0.72)}=\boxed{79.53\ \text{g/L (as Na}_2\text{O)}}$$
Causticizing efficiency CE=NaOH/(NaOH+Na2CO3) gives the residual (uncausticized, i.e.
causticized-from) carbonate:
$$\text{Na}_2\text{CO}_3=\text{NaOH}\left(\frac{1}{CE}-1\right)=79.53(1/0.82-1)=\boxed{17.46\ \text{g/L (as
Na}_2\text{O)}}=29.87\ \text{g/L actual Na}_2\text{CO}_3$$
(4c) Lime mud and lime stoichiometry. Causticizing reaction
$\text{Na}_2\text{CO}_3+\text{Ca(OH)}_2\rightarrow2\text{NaOH}+\text{CaCO}_3$ (1:1:1 molar), lime slaked in
situ via $\text{CaO}+\text{H}_2\text{O}\rightarrow\text{Ca(OH)}_2$. At 29.87 g Na2CO3/L
(M=105.99 g/mol) → 0.2818 mol/L:
$$\text{CaO (stoichiometric)}=0.2818\times56.08=15.80\ \text{g/L WL}\qquad
\text{CaCO}_3\ \text{(lime mud)}=0.2818\times100.09=28.20\ \text{g/L WL}$$
Scaling by the white-liquor flow (779.6 L/min):
$$\dot m_{CaCO_3}=28.20\times779.6/1000=\boxed{21.98\ \text{kg/min}}\ (31.7\ \text{t/day, lime mud to the
kiln})$$
$$\dot m_{CaO,stoich}=15.80\times779.6/1000=\boxed{12.32\ \text{kg/min}}$$
Correcting for the stated 88% lime availability (fraction of the reburned lime that is actually active CaO)
gives the ACTUAL raw lime the slaker must be fed:
$$\dot m_{CaO,actual}=12.32/0.88=\boxed{14.00\ \text{kg/min}}\ (20.2\ \text{t/day})$$
Quantity
Value
(1) White liquor
31,185 L/batch (31.2 m³/batch)
(2) Black liquor
36,296 L/batch (36.3 m³/batch)
(3) Brown-stock production rate
320.0 O.D. t/day (≈356 ADMT/day) — assumed 4.0 h cycle