23-Chem-B6 Petroleum Refining and Petrochemicals · May 2014
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Paper format: Closed-book, 3 hours; six “Problem” blocks of equal value (20 marks each), of which five constitute a complete paper (the first five in the answer book are marked). Sub-parts (a),(b),(c)… may be treated independently. Most parts call for concise essay answers; several require calculations with all steps shown. All six problems are solved below.
Reference texts: Gary, Handwerk, Kaiser & Geddes, Petroleum Refining: Technology and Economics (5th ed., CRC Press) — refinery processes and product properties; Fahim, Al-Sahhaf & Elkilani, Fundamentals of Petroleum Refining (Elsevier) — hydrogen production, cracking, treating; Felder, Rousseau & Bullard, Elementary Principles of Chemical Processes (4th ed., Wiley) — material balances, recycle, combustion and gas-law calculations; supporting property data from Perry’s Chemical Engineers’ Handbook (9th ed.).
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
Alkylation reacts light olefins (propylene, butylenes, amylenes) with isobutane over a strong-acid catalyst to make alkylate — a mixture of highly branched, high-octane C₇–C₈ paraffins that is a premium, low-vapour-pressure gasoline blendstock. The exothermic reaction is run cold in an intensely mixed contactor; the acid is then settled out and recycled, the hydrocarbon is neutralised, and the products are fractionated with unreacted isobutane recycled to extinction.
Isobutane is held in large excess (isobutane:olefin ≈ 5–8:1) to suppress olefin polymerisation and maximise alkylate quality.
Catalysts: concentrated sulphuric acid (H₂SO₄) and hydrofluoric acid (HF) are the two standard liquid catalysts; solid-acid catalysts are a newer alternative. Feedstock: isobutane plus light olefins (C₃–C₅: propylene, butylenes, amylenes), typically supplied from the fluid catalytic cracker and coker gas plants.
(i) Increasing light-olefin yield. (2 marks) Light olefins (ethylene, propylene) are favoured by high severity: raise the coil outlet temperature (≈ 800–850 °C), shorten the residence time (milliseconds), lower the hydrocarbon partial pressure (more steam dilution), and use a lighter, more paraffinic feed. High temperature with short contact time cracks the paraffins to olefins while quenching quickly enough to prevent the secondary reactions (further cracking, condensation, coking) that destroy the olefins.
(ii) Why steam is introduced. (2 marks) Steam is a diluent that lowers the hydrocarbon partial pressure, which by Le Chatelier shifts the mole-increasing cracking reactions toward olefins and suppresses the bimolecular condensation reactions that form coke. It also reduces coke deposition on the tube walls (partly by the reaction $C + H_2O \rightarrow CO + H_2$), improves selectivity, lowers the residence time, and carries heat into the reaction — which is why these units are called steam crackers.
Given. Basis 100 kg coke: 80 kg C, 0.5 kg H, 19.5 kg mineral ash. Combustion with 50% excess air; the solid ash formed contains 2% unburned carbon; of the carbon that burns, 95% forms CO₂ and 5% forms CO.
| Component (per 100 kg coke) | Value |
|---|---|
| Carbon | 80 kg |
| Hydrogen | 0.5 kg |
| Mineral ash | 19.5 kg |
| Excess air | 50% |
| Unburned C in ash | 2 wt% |
| Burned C to CO₂ / CO | 95% / 5% |
Find. (i) reaction equations; (ii) flue-gas composition; (iii) ash produced; (iv) carbon lost, all per 100 kg coke.
Approach. Fix the solid residue from the ash + unburned-carbon rule; that gives the carbon actually burned. Base the theoretical air on complete combustion of all fuel C and H; apply the 50% excess to get O₂ and N₂ supplied; then close a species balance on the actual products (95% CO₂ / 5% CO split) to get the flue gas.
(i) Reactions.
$$C + O_2 \rightarrow CO_2 \qquad C + \tfrac{1}{2}O_2 \rightarrow CO \qquad H_2 + \tfrac{1}{2}O_2 \rightarrow H_2O.$$
Check: the theoretical air is taken (Felder convention) as that needed to burn all the fuel carbon and hydrogen completely to CO₂ and H₂O, then 50% excess is applied. If instead the excess is referenced only to the carbon actually burned, O₂ and N₂ fall by ~0.5% and the flue-gas percentages shift by <0.1 point — immaterial to the answer.
| Flue-gas species (wet) | mol% |
|---|---|
| CO₂ | 12.9 |
| CO | 0.68 |
| O₂ | 7.4 |
| N₂ | 78.5 |
| H₂O | 0.5 |
| Ash produced | 19.90 kg / 100 kg coke |
| Carbon lost (unburned) | 0.398 kg / 100 kg coke |