16-Civ-A1 Elementary Structural Analysis · May 2013
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
National Exams, May 2013 — 98-Civ-A1 Elementary Structural Analysis. Three-hour, closed-book examination (approved Sharp/Casio calculator only). Format: six questions constitute a complete paper — answer all of #1–#5 and any one of #6, #7 or #8. All eight questions are solved below for completeness.
Reference texts: R.C. Hibbeler, Structural Analysis (10th ed., Pearson) — determinacy, method of joints/sections, virtual-work deflections, moment distribution, slope–deflection, influence lines; A. Kassimali, Structural Analysis (6th ed., Cengage) — internal hinges and compound structures. Sign convention: sagging bending moment positive; tension member forces positive (T), compression negative (C).
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
Given. An L-frame: pinned at joint 1, a 6 m column 1–2, a 12 m beam 2–3, roller at joint 3. A 36 kN horizontal load acts at joint 2. Flexural rigidity $EI=16.0\times10^{5}$ kN·m²; axial deformation neglected.
Find. The horizontal deflection of joint 2 (in the direction of the 36 kN load).
Approach. This determinate frame deflects in flexure only, so use virtual work: $\delta=\displaystyle\int \frac{M\,m}{EI}\,ds$, with $M$ the real bending moment and $m$ the moment from a unit horizontal load at joint 2.
Both member integrals are of the form $\int(\text{linear})^2\,ds$ because the bending moment varies linearly along each member; the column contributes 2592 and the beam 5184, so the beam — twice as long — dominates the response even though its peak moment (216 kN·m at joint 2) equals the column's. The positive result confirms joint 2 moves in the same sense as the applied 36 kN, as physical intuition demands: the column bends as a vertical cantilever off the pin while the beam rotates about the roller, and the two rotations add at the knee. Axial shortening is neglected because both members are slender and the frame carries the horizontal thrust chiefly in flexure, so a flexure-only virtual-work integral is accurate to well within engineering tolerance here.
| Quantity | Value |
|---|---|
| $\int Mm\,ds$ | 7776 kN²·m³ |
| Horizontal deflection of joint 2 | 4.86 mm |