16-Civ-A1 Elementary Structural Analysis · December 2014
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Reference texts: R.C. Hibbeler, Structural Analysis (10th ed., Pearson) — determinacy, method of joints/sections, virtual-work deflections, moment distribution, influence lines; A. Kassimali, Structural Analysis (6th ed., Cengage) — internal hinges and compound (Gerber) structures, three-hinged frames. Sign convention: sagging bending moment positive; upward reactions positive; tension member forces positive (T), compression negative (C); distances in metres, forces in kN.
Exam rule: six questions constitute a complete paper — answer all of #1–#5 and only one of #6/#7/#8. All eight are solved here as a complete study resource.
Source note: Member geometry, support types and load directions for Questions 4, 7 and 8 were read from the printed figures; every reconstructed dimension yields clean, self-consistent equilibrium. Where a figure value was inferred, it is stated explicitly — verify against the original booklet if using for assessment.
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
Given. $A$ pin at $x=0$, $C$ roller at $x=6$; $84$ kN at $B$ ($x=3$), $36$ kN at $D$ ($x=9$, cantilever tip); $EI_{AB}=EI$, $EI_{BC}=EI_{CD}=2EI$, $EI=7.5\times10^4$ kN·m². Find. the vertical deflection $\delta_B$.
Approach. Determinate beam → unit-load (virtual-work) method $\displaystyle \delta_B=\int \frac{M\,m}{EI}\,dx$, with the real moment $M$ from the 84/36 kN loads and the virtual moment $m$ from a unit load at $B$.
The deflection is small — about $1/1850$ of the 3 m A–B span — because the stiffer $2EI$ segment covers the region where the virtual moment is largest, and because the cantilever load contributes only indirectly. As a sanity check, ignoring the stiffness step (treating the whole beam as $EI$) would over-predict the deflection by the $13.5/EI$ that the $2EI$ segment saves, i.e. by roughly 11 %, confirming that the non-prismatic modelling matters here.
| Quantity | Value |
|---|---|
| $R_A,\;R_C$ | 24 kN, 96 kN |
| $\int Mm/EI$ | $121.5/EI$ |
| $\delta_B$ | 1.62 mm downward |