16-Civ-A1 Elementary Structural Analysis · December 2014
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Reference texts: R.C. Hibbeler, Structural Analysis (10th ed., Pearson) — determinacy, method of joints/sections, virtual-work deflections, moment distribution, influence lines; A. Kassimali, Structural Analysis (6th ed., Cengage) — internal hinges and compound (Gerber) structures, three-hinged frames. Sign convention: sagging bending moment positive; upward reactions positive; tension member forces positive (T), compression negative (C); distances in metres, forces in kN.
Exam rule: six questions constitute a complete paper — answer all of #1–#5 and only one of #6/#7/#8. All eight are solved here as a complete study resource.
Source note: Member geometry, support types and load directions for Questions 4, 7 and 8 were read from the printed figures; every reconstructed dimension yields clean, self-consistent equilibrium. Where a figure value was inferred, it is stated explicitly — verify against the original booklet if using for assessment.
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
Given. Two-force tie rod $D$–$B$ (length 6.25 m, $AE=4.5\times10^4$ kN); bent beam $A$–$B$–$C$ ($EI=2.4\times10^5$ kN·m², inextensible); 60 kN down at C. Find. horizontal deflection $\delta_{C,h}$.
Approach. The structure is determinate. Compute the real tie force and beam moments; apply a unit horizontal load at C for the virtual forces; then $\displaystyle \delta_{C,h}=\int\frac{Mm}{EI}\,ds+\frac{N n L}{AE}$.
The axial flexibility of the slender tie rod dominates the response: it supplies 25 of the 35 mm, while the two stiff, inextensible beams bend only enough to add 10 mm. This is typical of tie-braced systems — the serviceability deflection is governed by the rod's $AE$, so increasing the rod area (not the beam depth) is the efficient way to stiffen point C. Had the rod been treated as rigid, the predicted deflection would be under-estimated by more than two-thirds.
| Contribution | Value |
|---|---|
| Tie rod ($NnL/AE$) | 25 mm |
| Beam bending ($\int Mm/EI$) | 10 mm |
| Total horizontal deflection at C | 35 mm |