16-Civ-A2 Elementary Structural Design · December 2019
Question 1 of 7: A1 — Truss compression member in back-to-back angles
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Examinations, December 2019 — 16-Civ-A2 Elementary Structural Design. Three hours, CLOSED BOOK. Seven questions in three parts: Part A (A1–A3, steel to CSA S16), Part B (B1–B3, reinforced concrete to CSA A23.3), Part C (C1, timber to CSA O86). A candidate submits five solutions — two from Part A, two from Part B and the single Part C question — all of equal value. All seven are solved below, because this set is a study resource rather than an exam script. Note 6 on page 1 states that all loads shown are unfactored unless otherwise stated, so every load pattern is factored here before it meets a resistance; Note 7 fixes G40.21 300W steel and 400W reinforcement unless a question says otherwise.
Reference texts.
CSA S16:19, Design of Steel Structures, and CISC Handbook of Steel Construction, 11th ed. — Clauses 13.3 (compression), 13.13 (welds), 17 (composite beams), and the angle/W-shape section tables.
CSA A23.3:19, Design of Concrete Structures, and the Cement Association of Canada Concrete Design Handbook, 4th ed. — Clauses 10 (flexure and columns) and 11 (shear).
CSA O86:19, Engineering Design in Wood, and the Canadian Wood Council Wood Design Manual — Clause 6 (sawn lumber) and the service-condition and size-factor tables.
Kulak & Grondin, Limit States Design in Structural Steel, 11th ed., Chs. 4, 5, 8, 9.
National Building Code of Canada, Table 4.1.3.2 (load combinations).
Check — assumptions declared under Note 1 of the paper. (i) Figure A1 shows a solid vertical between F and C as well as the load arrow at C; that member is required, because without it the truss counts m + r = 12 + 3 = 15 against 2n = 16 and is a mechanism. With it, m + r = 16 = 2n and the truss is determinate, which is how it is solved here. (ii) In A3 the number of shear studs is reported as a bonus; the question asks only for the ultimate moment. (iii) In B1 the two stacked dimensions read as a sum, so the tee is 100 mm flange plus 400 mm of stem, i.e. 500 mm overall, and the beam spacing of 1250 mm governs the effective flange width because no span is given. (iv) In C1 the 1.5 kPa / 1.0 kPa area loads are converted to line loads on the 0.9 m tributary width, and the deflection limits adopted are L/240 on the back span and 2L/180 on the cantilever.
Question 1: A1 — Truss compression member in back-to-back angles (20 marks)
Given. The design starts from the truss geometry and support conditions of Figure A1, the specified panel load P1 (75 kN live, 90 kN dead), a 3.0 m long member FG, 300W steel and a 10 mm gap between the angles.
Given data
Item
Value
Panel load P1 (specified)
75 kN live, 90 kN dead
Panel length / truss depth
3.0 m / 4.0 m
Overall span
9.0 m, pin at A, roller at D
Member FG length
3.0 m (top-chord panel)
Steel grade (Note 7)
G40.21 300W, Fy = 300 MPa
Gap between angles
10 mm
Find. The factored compression in FG, a back-to-back double-angle section that carries it under CSA S16 Clause 13.3, and the spacing of the interconnectors needed to make the two angles act as one member.
Figure A1 rebuilt to scale: 9 m truss, 4 m deep, equal factored panel loads at G, F and C.
Approach. Factor the panel load, solve the determinate truss by joint equilibrium to get the compression in FG, then select a double-angle strut and check it with the S16 Clause 13.3.1 column curve about both principal axes before setting the interconnector spacing from Clause 19.1.4.
Factor the panel load. Note 6 says the figure loads are unfactored, and the governing combination for gravity-only framing is NBCC case 2, $1.25D + 1.5L$: $$P_{1f} = 1.25(90) + 1.5(75) = 112.5 + 112.5 = \boxed{225\ \text{kN}}$$
Confirm the truss is determinate. With eight joints, thirteen members and three reaction components, $m + r = 13 + 3 = 16 = 2n$. Dropping the vertical CF would leave fifteen unknowns for sixteen equations, i.e. a mechanism — which is the check that settles whether the line from F to C is a member or only the load arrow. It is a member.
Reactions. Taking moments about A for the three 225 kN loads at x = 3, 6 and 6 m: $$R_D = \frac{225(3) + 225(6) + 225(6)}{9} = 375\ \text{kN},\qquad R_A = 3(225) - 375 = 300\ \text{kN}$$ and $H_A = 0$ because every applied load is vertical.
Pick off the zero-force members first. Joint H carries only AH and HG at right angles with no load, so both are zero; the same argument at E makes DE zero. That removes the whole left-hand and right-hand end panels from the load path and is worth stating, because it tells the designer FG is fed only through joint G.
Method of sections for FG. Cut vertically between B and C, through FG, BF and BC, and take moments about B (where BF and BC intersect) on the left free body. That free body carries $R_A = 300$ kN up at A and the 225 kN load at G, so $$\sum M_B = 0:\quad F_{FG}(4) + 300(3) - 225(0) = 0 \;\Rightarrow\; F_{FG} = -225\ \text{kN}$$ The negative sign is compression, and a full joint-equilibrium solve of all thirteen members confirms it: $$\boxed{C_f = 225\ \text{kN (compression) in FG}}$$
Trial section. Try two L89×89×9.5 angles back to back with the 10 mm gap. Per angle $A = 1600$ mm², $I = 1.16\times10^{6}$ mm⁴, $r_x = 27.0$ mm, $r_z = 17.4$ mm and $\bar{x} = 25.9$ mm, so for the pair $A_g = 3200$ mm². About the axis parallel to the connected legs $r_x$ is unchanged at 27.0 mm; about the axis through the gap the parallel-axis theorem gives $$I_y = 2\left[1.16\times10^{6} + 1600\,(25.9 + 5)^{2}\right] = 5.375\times10^{6}\ \text{mm}^{4},\qquad r_y = \sqrt{\tfrac{5.375\times10^{6}}{3200}} = 41.0\ \text{mm}$$
Slenderness. The panel is 3.0 m long and pinned at both ends within the truss, so $K = 1.0$ and the weaker axis is x-x: $$\frac{KL}{r_x} = \frac{3000}{27.0} = 111.1 \;\;>\;\; \frac{3000}{41.0} = 73.2$$ The back-to-back arrangement has deliberately made the gap axis the stronger one; that is the whole point of pairing the angles.
Compressive resistance, S16 Clause 13.3.1. $$\lambda = \frac{KL}{r}\sqrt{\frac{F_y}{\pi^{2}E}} = \frac{111.1}{\pi}\sqrt{\frac{300}{200\,000}} = 1.370$$ $$C_r = \phi A F_y\left(1 + \lambda^{2n}\right)^{-1/n},\quad \phi = 0.90,\ n = 1.34$$ $$C_r = 0.90(3200)(300)\left(1 + 1.370^{2.68}\right)^{-1/1.34} = \boxed{353\ \text{kN}}$$ Since $C_f/C_r = 225/353 = 0.64$, the pair is adequate with sensible reserve.
Interconnector spacing, S16 Clause 19.1.4. The connectors must keep the slenderness of one angle about its own weak (z-z) axis below three quarters of the governing slenderness of the built-up member: $$\frac{s}{r_z} \le 0.75\frac{KL}{r} \;\Rightarrow\; s \le 0.75(111.1)(17.4) = 1450\ \text{mm}$$ Use three interconnectors at 750 mm centres (quarter points of the 3.0 m panel), giving $s/r_z = 750/17.4 = 43.1$ against the limit of 83.3. Each is a 10 mm filler plate with two M20 A325 bolts, matching the 10 mm gap called for in the question.
Final results
Quantity
Value
Factored panel load P1f
225 kN
Reactions RA / RD
300 kN / 375 kN
Factored compression in FG
225 kN (compression)
Section selected
2 — L89×89×9.5, back to back, 10 mm gap
Ag, rx, ry
3200 mm², 27.0 mm, 41.0 mm
KL/r (governing, x-x)
111.1
Cr (S16 13.3.1)
353 kN
Utilisation Cf/Cr
0.64
Interconnectors
3 @ 750 mm (limit 1450 mm), 10 mm fillers, 2-M20 each