16-Civ-A2 Elementary Structural Design · December 2019
Question 4 of 7: B1 — Moment and shear resistance of a reinforced concrete tee
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Examinations, December 2019 — 16-Civ-A2 Elementary Structural Design. Three hours, CLOSED BOOK. Seven questions in three parts: Part A (A1–A3, steel to CSA S16), Part B (B1–B3, reinforced concrete to CSA A23.3), Part C (C1, timber to CSA O86). A candidate submits five solutions — two from Part A, two from Part B and the single Part C question — all of equal value. All seven are solved below, because this set is a study resource rather than an exam script. Note 6 on page 1 states that all loads shown are unfactored unless otherwise stated, so every load pattern is factored here before it meets a resistance; Note 7 fixes G40.21 300W steel and 400W reinforcement unless a question says otherwise.
Reference texts.
CSA S16:19, Design of Steel Structures, and CISC Handbook of Steel Construction, 11th ed. — Clauses 13.3 (compression), 13.13 (welds), 17 (composite beams), and the angle/W-shape section tables.
CSA A23.3:19, Design of Concrete Structures, and the Cement Association of Canada Concrete Design Handbook, 4th ed. — Clauses 10 (flexure and columns) and 11 (shear).
CSA O86:19, Engineering Design in Wood, and the Canadian Wood Council Wood Design Manual — Clause 6 (sawn lumber) and the service-condition and size-factor tables.
Kulak & Grondin, Limit States Design in Structural Steel, 11th ed., Chs. 4, 5, 8, 9.
National Building Code of Canada, Table 4.1.3.2 (load combinations).
Check — assumptions declared under Note 1 of the paper. (i) Figure A1 shows a solid vertical between F and C as well as the load arrow at C; that member is required, because without it the truss counts m + r = 12 + 3 = 15 against 2n = 16 and is a mechanism. With it, m + r = 16 = 2n and the truss is determinate, which is how it is solved here. (ii) In A3 the number of shear studs is reported as a bonus; the question asks only for the ultimate moment. (iii) In B1 the two stacked dimensions read as a sum, so the tee is 100 mm flange plus 400 mm of stem, i.e. 500 mm overall, and the beam spacing of 1250 mm governs the effective flange width because no span is given. (iv) In C1 the 1.5 kPa / 1.0 kPa area loads are converted to line loads on the 0.9 m tributary width, and the deflection limits adopted are L/240 on the back span and 2L/180 on the cantilever.
Question 4: B1 — Moment and shear resistance of a reinforced concrete tee (20 marks)
Given. The design starts from the tee of Figure B1 — a 100 mm flange over a 400 mm stem 250 mm wide, five 25M bars in two layers, 2-20M in the flange and 10M stirrups at 200 mm — in 30 MPa concrete at 1250 mm centres.
Given data
Item
Value
Flange / stem
100 mm thick flange; 400 mm stem; 500 mm overall
Stem width bw / spacing
250 mm / 1250 mm on centre
Concrete / steel
f′c = 30 MPa; 400W, fy = 400 MPa
Tension steel
3-25M bottom layer + 2-25M second layer = 2500 mm²
Flange steel
2-20M = 600 mm²
Stirrups
10M double leg @ 200 mm (Av = 200 mm²)
Cover
40 mm clear to the 10M stirrup
Find. The factored moment resistance Mr and the factored shear resistance Vr of the section.
Figure B1 rebuilt: 1250 mm effective flange, 250 mm stem, five 25M bars in two layers, 2-20M near the top of the stem.
Approach. Locate the bar centroids, assume the rectangular stress block lies inside the flange and verify it, solve horizontal equilibrium by strain compatibility (the 2-20M turn out to be below the neutral axis and therefore in tension), then apply the A23.3 simplified shear method.
Effective flange width. The question gives no span, so A23.3 Clause 10.3 reduces to the physical limit: the tee cannot claim more slab than the beam spacing, $$b_{\text{eff}} = 1250\ \text{mm}$$
Bar positions, measured from the top fibre. With 40 mm clear cover, a 10M stirrup (11.3 mm) and 25M bars (25.2 mm), the bottom layer sits at $500 - (40 + 11.3 + 12.6) = 436.1$ mm and the second layer 50.2 mm above it at 385.9 mm. The effective depth is the centroid of the five bars: $$d = \frac{3(500)(436.1) + 2(500)(385.9)}{2500} = \boxed{416.0\ \text{mm}}$$ The 2-20M in the flange sit at $40 + 11.3 + 9.75 = 61.0$ mm from the top.
Trial: is the stress block inside the flange? With $\alpha_1 = 0.85 - 0.0015(30) = 0.805$ and $\beta_1 = 0.97 - 0.0025(30) = 0.895$, the compression per unit depth over the full flange is $\alpha_1\phi_c f′_c b_{\text{eff}} = 0.805(0.65)(30)(1250) = 19\,622$ N/mm. The five 25M bars deliver $T = \phi_s A_s f_y = 0.85(2500)(400) = 850$ kN, which needs only $a = 850\,000/19\,622 = 43$ mm. That is well inside the 100 mm flange, so the tee behaves as a 1250 mm wide rectangular section.
Solve equilibrium by strain compatibility. Bisecting on the neutral-axis depth until the net axial force vanishes gives $$c = 52.0\ \text{mm},\qquad a = \beta_1 c = 46.5\ \text{mm}$$ confirming the rectangular assumption.
The 2-20M bars are in tension, not compression. At $c = 52.0$ mm and a bar level of 61.0 mm, the strain is $$\varepsilon = 0.0035\,\frac{c - y}{c} = 0.0035\,\frac{52.0 - 61.0}{52.0} = -0.00061$$ i.e. tensile. Those bars sit below the neutral axis even though they are near the top of the member, because the wide flange pulls the axis up so hard. They add a small tensile force on a short lever arm, worth about 0.3 % on $M_r$ — correct to include, but not decisive here.
Moment resistance. Taking moments of the concrete block and the steel forces about the tensile resultant, $$\boxed{M_r = 336\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}}$$ A quick hand check confirms the magnitude: $T(d - a/2) = 850(416.0 - 23.3)/10^{3} = 334$ kN·m.
Minimum steel. A23.3 Clause 10.5.1.2 requires $$A_{s,\min} = \frac{0.2\sqrt{f′_c}}{f_y}\,b_t h = \frac{0.2\sqrt{30}}{400}(250)(500) = 342\ \text{mm}^{2}$$ against 2500 mm² provided. Comfortably satisfied, and the section is strongly tension-controlled ($c/d = 0.125$), so it will warn before it fails.