NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

16-Civ-A2 Elementary Structural Design · December 2019

Question 4 of 7: B1 — Moment and shear resistance of a reinforced concrete tee

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. National Examinations, December 2019 — 16-Civ-A2 Elementary Structural Design. Three hours, CLOSED BOOK. Seven questions in three parts: Part A (A1–A3, steel to CSA S16), Part B (B1–B3, reinforced concrete to CSA A23.3), Part C (C1, timber to CSA O86). A candidate submits five solutions — two from Part A, two from Part B and the single Part C question — all of equal value. All seven are solved below, because this set is a study resource rather than an exam script. Note 6 on page 1 states that all loads shown are unfactored unless otherwise stated, so every load pattern is factored here before it meets a resistance; Note 7 fixes G40.21 300W steel and 400W reinforcement unless a question says otherwise.

Reference texts.

Check — assumptions declared under Note 1 of the paper. (i) Figure A1 shows a solid vertical between F and C as well as the load arrow at C; that member is required, because without it the truss counts m + r = 12 + 3 = 15 against 2n = 16 and is a mechanism. With it, m + r = 16 = 2n and the truss is determinate, which is how it is solved here. (ii) In A3 the number of shear studs is reported as a bonus; the question asks only for the ultimate moment. (iii) In B1 the two stacked dimensions read as a sum, so the tee is 100 mm flange plus 400 mm of stem, i.e. 500 mm overall, and the beam spacing of 1250 mm governs the effective flange width because no span is given. (iv) In C1 the 1.5 kPa / 1.0 kPa area loads are converted to line loads on the 0.9 m tributary width, and the deflection limits adopted are L/240 on the back span and 2L/180 on the cantilever.

Question 4: B1 — Moment and shear resistance of a reinforced concrete tee (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. The design starts from the tee of Figure B1 — a 100 mm flange over a 400 mm stem 250 mm wide, five 25M bars in two layers, 2-20M in the flange and 10M stirrups at 200 mm — in 30 MPa concrete at 1250 mm centres.

Given data
ItemValue
Flange / stem100 mm thick flange; 400 mm stem; 500 mm overall
Stem width bw / spacing250 mm / 1250 mm on centre
Concrete / steelf′c = 30 MPa; 400W, fy = 400 MPa
Tension steel3-25M bottom layer + 2-25M second layer = 2500 mm²
Flange steel2-20M = 600 mm²
Stirrups10M double leg @ 200 mm (Av = 200 mm²)
Cover40 mm clear to the 10M stirrup

Find. The factored moment resistance Mr and the factored shear resistance Vr of the section.

2-20M2-25M3-25M100400250 mmb_eff = 1250 mm
Figure B1 rebuilt: 1250 mm effective flange, 250 mm stem, five 25M bars in two layers, 2-20M near the top of the stem.

Approach. Locate the bar centroids, assume the rectangular stress block lies inside the flange and verify it, solve horizontal equilibrium by strain compatibility (the 2-20M turn out to be below the neutral axis and therefore in tension), then apply the A23.3 simplified shear method.

  1. Effective flange width. The question gives no span, so A23.3 Clause 10.3 reduces to the physical limit: the tee cannot claim more slab than the beam spacing, $$b_{\text{eff}} = 1250\ \text{mm}$$
  2. Bar positions, measured from the top fibre. With 40 mm clear cover, a 10M stirrup (11.3 mm) and 25M bars (25.2 mm), the bottom layer sits at $500 - (40 + 11.3 + 12.6) = 436.1$ mm and the second layer 50.2 mm above it at 385.9 mm. The effective depth is the centroid of the five bars: $$d = \frac{3(500)(436.1) + 2(500)(385.9)}{2500} = \boxed{416.0\ \text{mm}}$$ The 2-20M in the flange sit at $40 + 11.3 + 9.75 = 61.0$ mm from the top.
  3. Trial: is the stress block inside the flange? With $\alpha_1 = 0.85 - 0.0015(30) = 0.805$ and $\beta_1 = 0.97 - 0.0025(30) = 0.895$, the compression per unit depth over the full flange is $\alpha_1\phi_c f′_c b_{\text{eff}} = 0.805(0.65)(30)(1250) = 19\,622$ N/mm. The five 25M bars deliver $T = \phi_s A_s f_y = 0.85(2500)(400) = 850$ kN, which needs only $a = 850\,000/19\,622 = 43$ mm. That is well inside the 100 mm flange, so the tee behaves as a 1250 mm wide rectangular section.
  4. Solve equilibrium by strain compatibility. Bisecting on the neutral-axis depth until the net axial force vanishes gives $$c = 52.0\ \text{mm},\qquad a = \beta_1 c = 46.5\ \text{mm}$$ confirming the rectangular assumption.
  5. The 2-20M bars are in tension, not compression. At $c = 52.0$ mm and a bar level of 61.0 mm, the strain is $$\varepsilon = 0.0035\,\frac{c - y}{c} = 0.0035\,\frac{52.0 - 61.0}{52.0} = -0.00061$$ i.e. tensile. Those bars sit below the neutral axis even though they are near the top of the member, because the wide flange pulls the axis up so hard. They add a small tensile force on a short lever arm, worth about 0.3 % on $M_r$ — correct to include, but not decisive here.
  6. Moment resistance. Taking moments of the concrete block and the steel forces about the tensile resultant, $$\boxed{M_r = 336\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}}$$ A quick hand check confirms the magnitude: $T(d - a/2) = 850(416.0 - 23.3)/10^{3} = 334$ kN·m.
  7. Minimum steel. A23.3 Clause 10.5.1.2 requires $$A_{s,\min} = \frac{0.2\sqrt{f′_c}}{f_y}\,b_t h = \frac{0.2\sqrt{30}}{400}(250)(500) = 342\ \text{mm}^{2}$$ against 2500 mm² provided. Comfortably satisfied, and the section is strongly tension-controlled ($c/d = 0.125$), so it will warn before it fails.
  8. Effective shear depth. $$d_v = \max(0.9d,\ 0.72h) = \max(374.4,\ 360) = 374.4\ \text{mm}$$
  9. Concrete contribution. The stirrups exceed the minimum, so the A23.3 Clause 11.3.6.3 simplified method applies with $\beta = 0.18$ and $\theta = 35^\circ$: $$V_c = \phi_c \lambda \beta \sqrt{f′_c}\, b_w d_v = 0.65(1.0)(0.18)\sqrt{30}\,(250)(374.4)/10^{3} = 60.0\ \text{kN}$$
  10. Stirrup contribution and total. $$V_s = \frac{\phi_s A_v f_y d_v \cot\theta}{s} = \frac{0.85(200)(400)(374.4)(1.428)}{200}\cdot\frac{1}{10^{3}} = 181.8\ \text{kN}$$ $$\boxed{V_r = V_c + V_s = 60.0 + 181.8 = 242\ \text{kN}}$$ The web-crushing cap is not approached: $0.25\phi_c f′_c b_w d_v = 456$ kN. Minimum stirrup area is also met, $A_{v,\min} = 0.06\sqrt{30}(250)(200)/400 = 41$ mm² against 200 mm² supplied.
Final results
QuantityValue
Effective flange width1250 mm
Effective depth d416.0 mm
Neutral axis c / stress block a52.0 mm / 46.5 mm (inside the flange)
Moment resistance Mr336 kN·m
State of the 2-20Mbelow the neutral axis — in tension
dv374.4 mm
Vc / Vs60.0 kN / 181.8 kN
Shear resistance Vr242 kN (crushing cap 456 kN)