NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

16-Civ-A3 Elementary Environmental Engineering · December 2019

Question 2 of 5: Pump characteristic curves

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format: National Exam 16-Civ-A3 Municipal and Environmental Engineering, December 2019 — 3 hours, open book, 100 marks. Five questions: answer Question 1 (mandatory) plus any three of Questions 2–5. All five are solved here as a study resource.

Reference texts: Davis & Cornwell, Introduction to Environmental Engineering (5th ed.); Mays, Water Resources Engineering (2nd ed.); Metcalf & Eddy, Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery (5th ed.); Mihelcic & Zimmerman, Environmental Engineering: Fundamentals, Sustainability, Design. Canadian practice: EGBC/MMCD municipal design guidelines.

Question 2: Pump characteristic curves (25 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. A single-pump test: discharge $Q=0,200,400,600,800,1000$ gpm at dynamic head $H=150,145,135,120,90,50$ ft respectively.

Given — single-pump test data (all six printed points)
Q (gpm)02004006008001,000
H (ft)1501451351209050

Find. The single-, series- and parallel-pump curves, and the pump arrangement that meets (a) 1,700 gpm at 80 ft and (b) 1,700 gpm at 160 ft.

Approach. Fit the test points to a head–discharge curve; build the series curve by adding heads at equal discharge and the parallel curve by adding discharges at equal head; then read which composite curve passes through (or above) each duty point.

040801201602002402803200300600900120015001800Discharge Q (gpm)Head H (ft)1700 gpm, 80 ft1700 gpm, 160 ftSingle pumpTwo in seriesTwo in parallel
Single-pump curve (solid), two in series (heads doubled), two in parallel (discharges doubled), with the two duty points marked.
  1. Plot and fit the pump curve (Part 1). Plotting $H$ against $Q$ for the six test points gives the falling characteristic shown. A least-squares parabola through all six is $H = 148.4 + 0.0167\,Q - 1.138\times10^{-4}\,Q^{2}$ (ft, $Q$ in gpm), which reproduces every tabulated head within about 2.6 ft. Shut-off head is the measured 150 ft; extrapolating the curve to $H=0$ gives a single-pump maximum discharge of $\boxed{Q_{max}\approx 1{,}220\ \text{gpm}}$.
  2. Series curve (Part 2). Two identical pumps in series pass the same discharge but each adds its head, so heads double at every $Q$: $H=300,290,270,240,180,100$ ft at $Q=0,200,400,600,800,1000$ gpm. This doubles the delivered head but does not raise the maximum discharge (still $\approx1{,}220$ gpm).
  3. Parallel curve (Part 3). Two identical pumps in parallel share the head but add discharge, so discharges double at every $H$: $Q=0,400,800,1200,1600,2000$ gpm at $H=150,145,135,120,90,50$ ft. This doubles the deliverable flow but cannot exceed the 150 ft shut-off head.
  4. Part 4 — 1,700 gpm at 80 ft. A single pump cannot do it: read off the curve at $H=80$ ft and it delivers only $Q\approx850$ gpm (linear interpolation between the printed 800 gpm/90 ft and 1,000 gpm/50 ft points gives exactly 850 gpm; the fitted parabola gives 852). Series does not help — two pumps in series still pass at most $\approx1{,}220$ gpm. Two in parallel each carry 850 gpm at the common head $H\approx80\ \text{ft}$, so the pair delivers 1,700 gpm at 80 ft: the duty point lies on the parallel curve. $\Rightarrow$ use $\boxed{\text{two pumps in parallel}}$.
  5. Part 5 — 1,700 gpm at 160 ft. This point needs both high flow ($1700>1220$ gpm, so parallel is required) and high head ($160>150$ ft shut-off, so series is required). Neither two-pump arrangement alone suffices: two in parallel give 1,700 gpm at only $\approx80$ ft, and two in series cap at $\approx1{,}220$ gpm. A series–parallel combination is needed — two parallel branches, each of two pumps in series (four pumps). Each branch carries 850 gpm and produces $2\times80 = 160\ \text{ft}$; the two branches together deliver 1,700 gpm. $\Rightarrow \boxed{\text{two series pairs in parallel (4 pumps)}}$.
Pump results
ItemResult
Fitted single-pump curve$H=148.4+0.0167Q-1.138\times10^{-4}Q^2$ ft
Single-pump maximum discharge≈1,220 gpm (extrapolated to $H=0$)
Series curve (2 pumps)Heads doubled: 300 / 290 / 270 / 240 / 180 / 100 ft
Parallel curve (2 pumps)Flows doubled: 0 / 400 / 800 / 1200 / 1600 / 2000 gpm
1,700 gpm @ 80 ftTwo pumps in parallel (850 gpm each at ≈80 ft)
1,700 gpm @ 160 ftTwo series pairs in parallel (4 pumps, 2×80 = 160 ft)
Check: each pump's share of the 1,700 gpm duty is 850 gpm, which lies inside the tested range (0–1,000 gpm), so the head read at that flow is an interpolation and not an extrapolation; only $Q_{max}$ is extrapolated (beyond 1,000 gpm). Both duty points land essentially exactly on the composite curves — 1,700 gpm at 80 ft on the two-pump parallel curve and 1,700 gpm at 160 ft on the four-pump series–parallel curve — which is how the question is constructed; a real selection would confirm against the manufacturer’s certified curve and allow a margin.