Question 3 of 6: Transmission main with a control valve
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exams — 98-Civ-A5 Hydraulic Engineering — May 2016.
Closed book; one aid sheet and a non-communicating calculator permitted. Six questions of equal value (20 marks each);
candidates answer any five. All six are solved here as a study resource. Exam-supplied relations: Hazen–Williams
$Q = 0.278\,C\,D^{2.63}\,S^{0.54}$ with $S = h_f/L$ (SI, $Q$ in m$^3$/s, $D,L$ in m), Manning
$Q=\tfrac{1}{n}A R^{2/3}S^{1/2}$, Darcy–Weisbach $\Delta h = 0.0826\,f\,L\,Q^2/D^5$, valve law
$Q=\tau E_s\sqrt{H_{u/s}-H_{d/s}}$, and $\mathrm{TDH}=H_s+H_f$. Water: $\rho=1000$ kg/m$^3$,
$\nu=1.31\times10^{-6}$ m$^2$/s.
Reference texts. Mays, Water Resources Engineering, 2nd ed. (pipe
networks, branched systems, valves, transmission mains); Chow, Open-Channel Hydraulics (Manning uniform flow,
critical depth, specific energy); Crowe, Elger & Roberson, Engineering Fluid Mechanics (pipe force balance,
laminar film flow).
Question 3: Transmission main with a control valve (20 marks)
Find. (a) the valve coefficient $\tau$; (b) the downstream reservoir level $h_B$; (c) the new
steady discharge when $\tau$ is reduced to 0.3.
Given data
Quantity
Value
Pipe length $L$
5,000 m
Hazen–Williams $C$
110
Inner diameter $D$
1,067 mm = 1.067 m
Upstream level $h_A$
105 m
Valve constant $E_s$
0.35 m$^{5/2}$/s
Case (a) discharge / valve loss
1 m$^3$/s / 5 m
Transmission main: upstream reservoir (105 m), 4,000 m of pipe to the valve, 1,000 m to the downstream reservoir.
Approach. The valve law fixes $\tau$ from the (a) operating point. An energy balance between
the two reservoir surfaces — friction over the full 5,000 m plus the valve loss — sets the downstream level.
Reducing $\tau$ raises the valve loss for a given flow, so (c) is found by balancing pipe friction plus valve loss against
the (now fixed) available head.
Valve coefficient (a). The valve law $Q=\tau E_s\sqrt{\Delta h_v}$ rearranges to
$\tau=\dfrac{Q}{E_s\sqrt{\Delta h_v}}$. With $Q=1$, $\Delta h_v=5$ m:
$$\tau=\frac{1}{0.35\sqrt{5}}=\boxed{1.28}.$$
Pipe friction at $Q=1$ m$^3$/s. Hazen–Williams over the full length:
$$h_{f,pipe}=5000\!\left[\frac{1.0}{0.278(110)(1.067)^{2.63}}\right]^{1/0.54}=6.47\text{ m}.$$
Downstream level (b). Energy from surface A to surface B loses pipe friction and valve head:
$$h_B=h_A-h_{f,pipe}-\Delta h_v=105-6.47-5.0=\boxed{93.5\ \text{m}}.$$
Discharge when $\tau=0.3$ (c). The available head is unchanged,
$h_A-h_B=105-93.5=11.47$ m, and must equal pipe friction plus the new valve loss
$\Delta h_v=\left(\dfrac{Q}{\tau E_s}\right)^2=\left(\dfrac{Q}{0.105}\right)^2$:
$$h_{f,pipe}(Q)+\left(\frac{Q}{0.105}\right)^2=11.47,\qquad
h_{f,pipe}(Q)=5000\!\left[\frac{Q}{0.278(110)(1.067)^{2.63}}\right]^{1/0.54}.$$
Here the tighter valve dominates. Solving iteratively (pipe loss $\approx0.9$ m, valve loss $\approx10.6$ m):
$$\boxed{Q\approx0.34\ \text{m}^3/\text{s}}.$$
Throttling the valve from $\tau=1.28$ to $0.3$ cuts the discharge from 1.0 to about 0.34 m$^3$/s.