Question 2 of 9: Schematic shear force and bending moment diagrams
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. 98-Civ-B1 Advanced Structural
Analysis, National Examinations, May 2013 — 3 hours, closed book (an approved
Sharp or Casio calculator is permitted). Nine questions are printed. The candidate must
answer Question 1 and Question 2, then two of Questions 3–5 and
two of Questions 6–9 — six questions constitute a complete paper
(8 + 12 + 2 × 16 + 2 × 24 =
100 marks). Marks are shown in the left margin of the paper.
All nine questions are solved below, because the set is intended as a study
resource rather than as a three-hour sitting.
Reference texts.
R. C. Hibbeler, Structural Analysis, 10th ed. — influence lines
(Ch. 6, 8), energy methods and Castigliano's theorems (Ch. 9), the force
(flexibility) method (Ch. 10), slope-deflection (Ch. 11) and moment distribution
(Ch. 12).
A. Kassimali, Structural Analysis, 6th ed. — Ch. 13 slope-deflection
including support settlement and sidesway; Ch. 8 influence lines for trusses.
A. Ghali, A. M. Neville and T. G. Brown, Structural Analysis: A Unified
Classical and Matrix Approach, 7th ed. — Ch. 3–5 force and displacement
methods, lack of fit and prescribed displacements.
J. C. McCormac and S. F. Csernak, Structural Analysis Using Classical and
Matrix Methods, 4th ed. — kinematic indeterminacy and the use of symmetry.
Sign conventions used throughout. Slope-deflection end moments
$M_{ij}$ are the moments the joint applies to the member, clockwise positive;
joint rotations $\theta$ are clockwise positive; the chord rotation
$\psi_{ij}=\Delta/L$ is positive when the member chord rotates clockwise. Bending moment
diagrams are plotted with sagging positive, so that the sagging moment at
end $i$ of member $ij$ is $+M_{ij}$ and at end $j$ it is $-M_{ji}$. All members are
inextensible unless stated otherwise, so axial deformation contributes nothing to the
compatibility equations.
Question 2: Schematic shear force and bending moment diagrams (12 marks)
$w$ on the overhang; two point loads $P$ at $L/3$ centres in
the third bay
(b)
three columns of height $1.5L$ at $L$ centres; hinged outer bases, fixed
centre base; continuous beam over both bays
horizontal $P$ at the top of the
left-hand column
(c)
single-bay portal, height $h$, span $L$; right-hand base fixed; left-hand
base on a horizontal guide
left-hand base translated a distance $\Delta$ to the left
after construction, with zero rotation of that joint
Find. The shape of the shear force and bending moment diagrams for each
structure, with the discontinuities, the points of zero shear and the points of
contraflexure located correctly.
Q2(a) — three-times statically indeterminate continuous beam. Ordinates are shown for the illustrative case $wL = P$; the shapes are independent of that choice.
(a) Establish the shape rules before computing anything. The beam has
three rollers plus a built-in end, so with five vertical/moment reaction components and two
equations of equilibrium it is three times statically indeterminate. Whatever the
redundants turn out to be, the diagrams must satisfy
$$V=\frac{dM}{dx},\qquad \frac{dV}{dx}=-w .$$
Hence: the shear is linear under the distributed load on the overhang and
constant everywhere else; it steps down by $P$ at each point load and steps up by
the reaction at each support. The moment is parabolic on the overhang and
piecewise linear elsewhere, is zero at the free tip, and is
continuous at every support (there is no applied couple anywhere).
(a) Fix the ordinates. Solving the three-fold redundancy (illustrative
case $w=P/L$, so $wL=P$) gives hogging peaks over the second and fourth supports,
a sagging peak under the first point load and a small sagging moment at the built-in end
because the last span carries no load and the fixed end must hold the beam down:
$$M_{\text{sag,max}} \approx +0.205\,PL,\qquad
M_{\text{hog}} \approx -0.113\,PL \text{ and } -0.158\,PL,$$
with $V_{\max}\approx+0.955P$ just right of the second support and $-1.045P$ just left of the
third. The overhang moment is a pure cantilever parabola $-wx^{2}/2$ running from zero at
the tip to $-wL^{2}/18$ over the first roller.
Q2(b) — two-bay frame under a lateral load. Hinged outer bases carry zero moment; the fixed centre base takes the largest moment.
(b) Read the boundary conditions off the supports. The two outer bases
are drawn with the “typical hinge” circle, so their bending moments are
identically zero and the moment diagram in each outer column is a straight
line from zero at the base to its value at the beam. The centre base is built in and takes a
finite moment. The beam is inextensible, so all three column heads share one sway
$\Delta$ and the storey-shear equation
$$\sum_{\text{columns}} \frac{M_{\text{top}}+M_{\text{bottom}}}{h} = -P$$
closes the system.
(b) Interpret the resulting diagrams. Since $P$ may be moved along the
inextensible beam, the loading is again anti-symmetric, so the two outer columns carry
identical moments and the two beam spans carry equal and opposite end moments. Each
column shear is constant, and the shear in each beam span is constant because no vertical
load acts. Numerically (illustrative $P=1$, $L=1$, $h=1.5$) the centre column takes
$0.548\,PL$ at its base and $0.490\,PL$ at its head, the outer columns take $0.231\,PL$ at
their heads, and the beams reach $\pm0.245\,PL$ at the centre joint. The centre column
carries no axial force — the signature of an anti-symmetric response
in a member lying on the axis of symmetry — while the outer columns carry equal and
opposite axial forces.
Q2(c) — portal whose left-hand base is displaced horizontally with the joint rotation held at zero. The action is a spread of the bases, so the response is symmetric and the beam carries a constant moment.
(c) Recognise that the imposed movement is a symmetric action. Only the
relative displacement of the two bases matters, because superposing a rigid-body
translation of the whole frame changes nothing. Moving the left base outward by $\Delta$ is
therefore identical to spreading the two bases apart by $\Delta$, which is a
symmetric action on a symmetric frame. Consequently the two column heads
share the movement equally, $u_B=u_C=-\Delta/2$, the two columns bend in mirror image, and
the two joint rotations are equal and opposite.
(c) Write one slope-deflection equation and close it. With
$k_c=2EI/h$, $k_b=2EI/L$ and the chord rotation $\psi=\Delta/(2h)$ in each column,
joint equilibrium at $B$ gives $k_c\!\left(2\theta-3\psi\right)+k_b\theta=0$, so
$$\theta=\frac{3\Delta L}{2h\,(2L+h)} .$$
For the square portal drawn ($h=L$) this reduces to $\theta=\Delta/(2L)$ and
$$\boxed{M_{\text{base}}=\frac{2EI\Delta}{h^{2}},\qquad
M_{\text{column head}}=M_{\text{beam}}=\frac{EI\Delta}{h^{2}},\qquad
V_{\text{column}}=\frac{3EI\Delta}{h^{3}} .}$$
The bending moment in the beam is the same at both ends and of the same sign,
so the beam carries a constant moment and zero shear — the diagnostic
feature that distinguishes a symmetric base spread from the anti-symmetric sway produced by
a lateral load, where the beam moment reverses across the span and the beam shear is finite.
Each column has one point of contraflexure, one third of the way up from the base.
Final results — key features of the six diagrams
Structure
Shear force diagram
Bending moment diagram
(a)
linear on the overhang ($0 \to -wL/3$), constant in every other bay, steps
of $P$ at the two point loads; peak $\approx +0.955P$ and $-1.045P$ in the third bay
($wL=P$)
parabolic on the overhang from zero at the tip; linear elsewhere; hogging
$\approx-0.113PL$ and $-0.158PL$ over the interior supports, sagging $\approx+0.205PL$ under
the first point load, small sagging moment at the built-in end
(b)
constant in each column (sum $=P$) and constant in each beam span
zero at both hinged bases; largest at the fixed centre base ($0.548PL$); beam moments
equal and opposite about the centre joint
(c)
equal and opposite constant shears $3EI\Delta/h^{3}$ in the two columns;
zero in the beam
$2EI\Delta/h^{2}$ at each base, $EI\Delta/h^{2}$
constant along the beam; one point of contraflexure per column at $h/3$ above the base