Question 6 of 9: Two-span beam with a settled central support
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. 98-Civ-B1 Advanced Structural
Analysis, National Examinations, May 2013 — 3 hours, closed book (an approved
Sharp or Casio calculator is permitted). Nine questions are printed. The candidate must
answer Question 1 and Question 2, then two of Questions 3–5 and
two of Questions 6–9 — six questions constitute a complete paper
(8 + 12 + 2 × 16 + 2 × 24 =
100 marks). Marks are shown in the left margin of the paper.
All nine questions are solved below, because the set is intended as a study
resource rather than as a three-hour sitting.
Reference texts.
R. C. Hibbeler, Structural Analysis, 10th ed. — influence lines
(Ch. 6, 8), energy methods and Castigliano's theorems (Ch. 9), the force
(flexibility) method (Ch. 10), slope-deflection (Ch. 11) and moment distribution
(Ch. 12).
A. Kassimali, Structural Analysis, 6th ed. — Ch. 13 slope-deflection
including support settlement and sidesway; Ch. 8 influence lines for trusses.
A. Ghali, A. M. Neville and T. G. Brown, Structural Analysis: A Unified
Classical and Matrix Approach, 7th ed. — Ch. 3–5 force and displacement
methods, lack of fit and prescribed displacements.
J. C. McCormac and S. F. Csernak, Structural Analysis Using Classical and
Matrix Methods, 4th ed. — kinematic indeterminacy and the use of symmetry.
Sign conventions used throughout. Slope-deflection end moments
$M_{ij}$ are the moments the joint applies to the member, clockwise positive;
joint rotations $\theta$ are clockwise positive; the chord rotation
$\psi_{ij}=\Delta/L$ is positive when the member chord rotates clockwise. Bending moment
diagrams are plotted with sagging positive, so that the sagging moment at
end $i$ of member $ij$ is $+M_{ij}$ and at end $j$ it is $-M_{ji}$. All members are
inextensible unless stated otherwise, so axial deformation contributes nothing to the
compatibility equations.
Question 6: Two-span beam with a settled central support (24 marks)
Find. The bending moment over the central support, the three reactions,
and the shear and bending moment diagrams with the maximum and minimum ordinates in each
span.
Q6 — two-span beam, its shear force diagram and its bending moment diagram. The 64 mm settlement is large enough to remove the hogging moment at the central support entirely.
Approach. Superpose two effects that the slope-deflection equations
handle in one pass: the fixed-end moments from the two distributed loads, and the chord
rotations produced by the 64 mm settlement. Impose $M_{12}=M_{32}=0$ at the simple ends
and $M_{21}+M_{23}=0$ at the central support.
Chord rotations and fixed-end moments. With $v_2=-0.064\text{ m}$ and
$v_1=v_3=0$,
$$\psi_{12}=\frac{v_1-v_2}{8}=+0.008,\qquad \psi_{23}=\frac{v_2-v_3}{8}=-0.008 .$$
The fixed-end moments for a uniformly loaded span are $\mp wL^{2}/12$:
$$\text{FEM}_{12}=-\frac{4(8)^{2}}{12}=-21.33,\quad \text{FEM}_{21}=+21.33,\quad
\text{FEM}_{23}=-\frac{8(8)^{2}}{12}=-42.67,\quad \text{FEM}_{32}=+42.67\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}.$$
Assemble the three equations. With $k=2EI/8=5000\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$,
$$M_{12}=k\!\left(2\theta_1+\theta_2-0.024\right)-21.33=0,\qquad
M_{32}=k\!\left(2\theta_3+\theta_2+0.024\right)+42.67=0,$$
$$M_{21}+M_{23}=k\!\left(2\theta_2+\theta_1-0.024\right)+21.33
+k\!\left(2\theta_2+\theta_3+0.024\right)-42.67=0 .$$
Solve for the rotations. The two end conditions give
$\theta_1=\tfrac12(0.028267-\theta_2)$ and $\theta_3=\tfrac12(-0.032533-\theta_2)$;
substituting into the joint equation leaves $15000\,\theta_2 = 32.0$, so
$$\boxed{\theta_2 = +0.002133\ \text{rad},\qquad \theta_1=+0.013067,\qquad
\theta_3=-0.017333\ \text{rad}.}$$
Find the moment over the central support.
$$M_{21}=5000\!\left(0.004267+0.013067-0.024\right)+21.33=-12.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m},$$
and $M_{23}=+12.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$, so the two balance as required. In the
sagging-positive convention the bending moment over support 2 is
$$\boxed{M_2 = -M_{21} = +12.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}\quad\text{(sagging).}}$$
It is worth separating the two contributions: the loads alone would give
$M_2=-(w_1+w_2)L^{2}/16=-48.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$ (hogging), while the settlement alone
gives $+3EI\delta/L^{2}=+60.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$ (sagging). The settlement therefore
reverses the sign of the support moment.
Reactions from span statics. Taking moments on each span with the end
moments known,
$$R_1=\frac{w_1L^{2}/2+M_2}{L}=\frac{128+12}{8}=17.50\ \text{kN},\qquad
V_{2}^{-}=w_1L-R_1=14.50\ \text{kN},$$
$$V_{2}^{+}=\frac{w_2L^{2}/2-M_2}{L}=\frac{256-12}{8}=30.50\ \text{kN},\qquad
R_3=w_2L-V_2^{+}=33.50\ \text{kN},$$
so $R_2 = 14.50+30.50 = 45.00\ \text{kN}$. Check: $17.50+45.00+33.50 = 96.0\ \text{kN}
= 4(8)+8(8)$.
Locate the zero-shear points and the sagging peaks. In span 1–2,
$V=17.50-4x=0$ at $x=4.375\text{ m}$, where
$$M_{\max}=17.50(4.375)-2(4.375)^{2}=\boxed{+38.28\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}} .$$
In span 2–3, measuring $x'$ from support 2, $V=30.50-8x'=0$ at $x'=3.8125\text{ m}$,
where
$$M_{\max}=12.0+30.50(3.8125)-4(3.8125)^{2}=\boxed{+70.14\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}} .$$
Read off the extreme ordinates. Because the support moment has become
sagging, the bending moment is positive over the whole 16 m: there is no point of
contraflexure anywhere, and the minimum bending moment in each span is the zero at its outer
simple support. The shear extremes are $+17.50$ and $-14.50\text{ kN}$ in span 1–2, and
$+30.50$ and $-33.50\text{ kN}$ in span 2–3.
Final results — Question 6
Quantity
Span 1–2
Span 2–3
Maximum shear
+17.50 kN at support 1
+30.50 kN at support 2
Minimum shear
−14.50 kN at support 2
−33.50 kN at support 3
Zero-shear station
4.375 m from support 1
3.8125 m from support 2
Maximum bending moment
+38.28 kN·m
+70.14 kN·m
Minimum bending moment
0 at support 1
0 at support 3
Bending moment over support 2
+12.0 kN·m sagging
(−48.0 from load, +60.0 from settlement)