NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

16-Civ-B1 Advanced Structural Analysis · May 2017

Question 8 of 9: Trapezoidal sway frame with an inextensible strut

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. National Exams, May 2017 — 16-Civ-B1 Advanced Structural Analysis. Three hours, CLOSED BOOK (an approved Sharp or Casio calculator is permitted). Answer BOTH Questions 1 and 2, ONLY TWO of Questions 3, 4 or 5, and ONLY TWO of Questions 6, 7, 8 or 9; six questions constitute a complete paper for 100 marks. Marks are printed in the left margin. All nine questions are worked below, because the complete set is the study resource.

Reference texts. R. C. Hibbeler, Structural Analysis, 10th ed. (Pearson) — Ch. 8 influence lines, Ch. 9–10 the force (flexibility) method, Ch. 11 slope-deflection, Ch. 14–16 the stiffness method; A. Kassimali, Structural Analysis, 6th ed. (Cengage) — Ch. 7 deflections by work and energy (Castigliano), Ch. 13 slope-deflection, Ch. 16 sidesway frames; W. McGuire, R. H. Gallagher & R. D. Ziemian, Matrix Structural Analysis, 2nd ed., for the element stiffness matrix used as the independent check. Once the analysis is complete, member design follows CSA A23.3:19, CSA S16:19 and CSA O86:19, with load combinations from NBCC 2020.

Check: sign convention used throughout. End moments $M_{ij}$ are counter-clockwise positive on the member end — the convention that matches the six-degree-of-freedom planar frame element stiffness matrix, so every answer below can be checked against a direct-stiffness solution. Chord rotation is $\psi_{ij}=\left[(\mathbf{D}_{j}-\mathbf{D}_{i})\cdot\mathbf{e}_{2}\right]/L$, where $\mathbf{e}_{2}$ is the member axis turned $+90^\circ$. The fixed-end moment of a downward uniform load is $\mathrm{FEM}_{ij}=+wL^{2}/12$ at the $i$ end and $-wL^{2}/12$ at the $j$ end; for a member released at its far end it becomes $+wL^{2}/8$. Ordinary sagging moments follow as $M_{\text{sag}}(i)=-M_{ij}$ and $M_{\text{sag}}(j)=+M_{ji}$, and all diagrams are plotted sagging positive. Member shear at the $i$ end is $V_{i}=(M_{ij}+M_{ji})/L$ plus the equivalent nodal shear of any span load. Mixing this with Hibbeler's clockwise-positive convention produces clean-looking integers that are wrong, so the convention is stated once and used everywhere.

Question 8: Trapezoidal sway frame with an inextensible strut (24 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. Members 1–2 (5 m, inclined 3:4) and 2–3 (6 m, horizontal) are flexural members of equal $EI$; member 3–4 (5 m, inclined 3:4 the other way) is a pin-ended inextensible strut carrying axial force only. Joint 1 is built in, joint 4 is pinned, all members are inextensible, and $w=16.4$ kN/m acts on 2–3.

Find. The end moments, the shear force and bending moment diagrams with their governing ordinates, the strut force and the reactions.

16.4 kN/m1234strut3 m6 m3 m4 mBending moment (kN.m), sagging positive-21.6-10.8+68.50strut 3-4: axial only, 59.25 kN compression; M = V = 0beam end shears 51 / 47.4 kN; member 1-2 shear 2.16 kN
The strut carries no moment, so joint 3 is moment-free; the inextensible members leave a single sway parameter.

Approach. Express the whole displacement field in terms of one sway parameter using inextensibility, write two slope-deflection equations (the beam moment-released at joint 3), and close with a virtual-work sway equation.

  1. Reduce the kinematics to one parameter. Member 1–2 is inextensible from a fixed base, so joint 2 can only move perpendicular to it: $3u_{2}+4v_{2}=0$. The horizontal member forces $u_{3}=u_{2}$, and the strut from the pinned joint 4 forces $3u_{3}-4v_{3}=0$. Writing $\delta=u_{2}=u_{3}$,$$v_{2}=-0.75\,\delta,\qquad v_{3}=+0.75\,\delta,$$so joint 2 drops as joint 3 rises. The chord rotations follow as$$\psi_{12}=-0.25\,\delta,\qquad \psi_{23}=+0.25\,\delta .$$One translation and one rotation ($\theta_{2}$) are therefore the only unknowns.
  2. Use the strut to release joint 3. A pin-ended strut transmits no moment, so $M_{32}=0$ and member 2–3 can be written with the modified stiffness. With $A=EI\theta_{2}$ and $B=EI\delta$,$$M_{12}=\frac{2}{5}\left(A+0.75B\right),\qquad M_{21}=\frac{2}{5}\left(2A+0.75B\right),$$$$M_{23}=\frac{3}{6}\left(A-0.25B\right)+\frac{wL^{2}}{8},\qquad \frac{wL^{2}}{8}=\frac{16.4(6)^{2}}{8}=73.8\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}.$$The modified fixed-end moment is $wL^{2}/8$, not $wL^{2}/12$, precisely because the far end is released.
  3. Enforce moment equilibrium at joint 2. Setting $M_{21}+M_{23}=0$ gives$$1.3A+0.175B=-73.8 .$$This is the only joint equation, because joint 3 carries no moment and joint 1 is built in.
  4. Write the sway equation by virtual work. Give the frame the unit sway pattern $\delta^{*}=1$ (so $v_{2}^{*}=-0.75$, $v_{3}^{*}=+0.75$, rotations held at zero). The strut does no work because it is inextensible, the equivalent nodal shears of the uniform load cancel, and what remains is$$0.25\left(M_{12}+M_{21}\right)-0.25\,M_{23}=0 .$$Substituting the member equations, $0.7A+0.725B=73.8$. Solving the pair,$$EI\theta_{2}=-81.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}^{2},\qquad EI\delta=\boxed{180\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}^{3}} .$$
  5. Recover the end moments. Back-substituting,$$M_{12}=21.6,\qquad M_{21}=-10.8,\qquad M_{23}=+10.8,\qquad M_{32}=0\ \ (\text{kN}\cdot\text{m}).$$Joint 2 balances exactly, and the moment magnitude of 10.8 kN·m is continuous through the joint as it must be where only two members meet.
  6. Build the diagrams. Member 1–2 carries no span load, so its moment runs linearly from $-21.6$ kN·m at the base to $-10.8$ kN·m at joint 2 with a constant shear of $(21.6-10.8)/5=2.16$ kN. On the beam, the end shears are$$V_{2}=\frac{M_{23}}{L}+\frac{wL}{2}=1.8+49.2=51.0\ \text{kN},\qquad V_{3}=47.4\ \text{kN},$$summing to $wL=98.4$ kN. The shear vanishes at $x=51.0/16.4=3.110$ m from joint 2, where the sagging moment peaks at$$M_{\max}=-10.8+\frac{51.0^{2}}{2(16.4)}=\boxed{68.5\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}},$$falling to zero at joint 3.
  7. Close with the strut force and reactions. Joint 3 carries only the beam shear and the strut, so the strut takes$$N_{34}=-\frac{V_{3}}{0.8}=-59.25\ \text{kN},$$that is 59.25 kN of compression, and being a two-force member it delivers its whole force along its own axis: the reaction at the pinned joint 4 is 35.55 kN horizontal and 47.4 kN vertical, resultant 59.25 kN. At the built-in base, the reaction is 35.55 kN horizontal, 51.0 kN vertical and 21.6 kN·m of fixing moment. Taking moments about joint 1 closes the check: $21.6+12(47.4)-6(98.4)=0$.
Question 8 — results
QuantityValue
$EI\theta_{2}$$-81.0$ kN·m$^{2}$
$EI\delta$ (sway to the right)$180$ kN·m$^{3}$
Moment at the built-in base, $M_{12}$21.6 kN·m
Moment at joint 2 (both members)10.8 kN·m
Moment at joint 30 (strut cannot carry moment)
Maximum sagging moment in the beam68.5 kN·m at 3.110 m from joint 2
Shear in member 1–2 (constant)2.16 kN
Beam end shears51.0 kN and 47.4 kN
Force in the strut 3–459.25 kN compression
Reaction at joint 135.55 kN horizontal, 51.0 kN vertical, 21.6 kN·m
Reaction at joint 435.55 kN horizontal, 47.4 kN vertical (along the strut)