NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

16-Civ-B2 Advanced Structural Design · Undated paper

Question 4 of 7: Reinforced concrete beam for the Figure 3 loading

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. 16-Civ-B2 Advanced Structural Design, 3 hours, closed book (handbooks and textbooks permitted). Seven design questions of 20 marks each in three parts — Part A (steel, do two of three), Part B (reinforced concrete, do two of three) and Part C (prestressed concrete, do question C1); five solutions constitute a complete paper. All seven are solved here, because the set is a study resource rather than an examination script.

Design data given on page 1. Solutions to the latest CAN/CSA S16 (steel), CAN/CSA A23.3 (concrete) and CAN/CSA O86 (timber). All loads shown on the figures are unfactored. Structural steel is G40.21 300W unless noted, so $F_y = 300\ \text{MPa}$ and $E = 200\,000\ \text{MPa}$; reinforcement is 400W, so $f_y = 400\ \text{MPa}$. Concrete strengths are stated question by question (25 MPa in B1 and B3, 35 MPa in B2, 40 MPa in C1). Load combinations follow NBCC Table 4.1.3.2.

Reference texts. CISC, Handbook of Steel Construction, 12th ed. (CSA S16-19 with commentary) — Parts 1, 4 and 5; Kulak & Grondin, Limit States Design in Structural Steel, 10th ed.; MacGregor & Bartlett, Reinforced Concrete: Mechanics and Design (Canadian edition); CAC, Concrete Design Handbook, 4th ed. (A23.3 with explanatory notes); Collins & Mitchell, Prestressed Concrete Structures; CPCI, Design Manual, 5th ed.; NBCC Part 4 for loads and load combinations.

Every value quoted here was read from the printed figure of the original page: B1 uses 25 MPa, B2 uses 35 MPa, B3 uses 150 kPa allowable / 225 kPa ultimate with 25 MPa concrete, and C1 refers to Figure 3, not Figure 2.

Question B1: Reinforced concrete beam for the Figure 3 loading (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given.

QuantityValue
Span4.5 m, simply supported (pin at A, roller at B)
W1, full spandead 4.5, live/snow 3.0, wind 3.6 kN/m
W2, triangularsnow 6.0 kN/m at A falling to zero at 2.5 m
Concrete$f_c' = 25\ \text{MPa}$, normal density, $\phi_c = 0.65$
Reinforcement400W, $f_y = 400\ \text{MPa}$, $\phi_s = 0.85$
Cover40 mm to the stirrup (interior exposure)

Find. A rectangular reinforced concrete cross-section, its flexural reinforcement and its shear reinforcement, adequate for the full NBCC load-combination envelope.

AB2.5 m4.5 mW1W2W1: DEAD 4.5 kN/mLIVE/SNOW 3.0 kN/mWIND 3.6 kN/mW2: SNOW 6 kN/mFigure 3 (not to scale)
Figure 3: 4.5 m simply supported beam carrying the uniform W1 group over the full span plus the triangular W2 snow load over the first 2.5 m.

Approach. Assume a trial section so that self weight can be included, run every NBCC principal load combination over the combined uniform-plus-triangular loading to find the governing moment and shear, then design a singly reinforced rectangular section and check that stirrups are needed.

  1. Assume a section and compute its self weight. A span of 4.5 m needs at least $L/16 = 281\ \text{mm}$ of depth to escape a deflection calculation under A23.3 Table 9.2. Take $b = 250\ \text{mm}$, $h = 450\ \text{mm}$: $$w_{sw} = 0.250(0.450)(24) = 2.70\ \text{kN/m}$$ so the total dead load is $4.5 + 2.7 = 7.2\ \text{kN/m}$.
  2. Set out the statics of the triangular load. For a load of peak intensity $p$ at A falling to zero at $a = 2.5\ \text{m}$, the resultant and its position are $$W = \tfrac{1}{2}pa = 1.25p, \quad \bar{x} = \tfrac{a}{3} = 0.833\ \text{m from A}$$ and the moment it produces at a section $x \le a$ is $$M_{tri}(x) = p\left(\frac{x^{2}}{2} - \frac{x^{3}}{6a}\right)$$ Beyond $x = a$ the whole resultant acts, so $M_{tri}(x) = W(x - \bar{x})$.
  3. Run the load combinations. Wind is treated as an additional vertical uniform load (see the callout below). Working through NBCC Table 4.1.3.2 with $D = 7.2$, $L = 3.0$, $W = 3.6\ \text{kN/m}$ uniform and $S = 6.0\ \text{kN/m}$ triangular:
    Combinationuniform (kN/m)triangular peak$M_{max}$ (kN·m)
    $1.4D$10.08—25.5
    $1.25D + 1.5L + 0.5S$13.503.035.8
    $1.25D + 1.5S + 1.0L$12.009.035.2
    $1.25D + 1.4W + 0.5L$15.54—39.3
    $1.25D + 1.4W + 0.5S$14.043.037.1
    $0.9D + 1.4W$ (uplift)1.44—3.7
    $$\boxed{M_f = 39.3\ \text{kN}\!\cdot\!\text{m}\ \text{at mid-span}, \quad V_f = 36.2\ \text{kN at A}}$$ The maximum shear comes from a different case, $1.25D + 1.5S + 1.0L$, because the triangular snow load piles its resultant near support A. Note also that even with the wind reversed the net load stays downward, so no uplift case governs.
  4. Compute the effective depth. With 40 mm cover, 10M stirrups and 15M main bars: $$d = 450 - 40 - 11.3 - \tfrac{16.0}{2} = 390.7\ \text{mm}$$
  5. Solve for the flexural steel. A23.3 Clause 10.1.7 gives the rectangular stress block parameters $$\alpha_1 = 0.85 - 0.0015f_c' = 0.8125, \quad \beta_1 = 0.97 - 0.0025f_c' = 0.9075$$ Equilibrium of the section with $a = \phi_s f_y A_s/\left(\alpha_1\phi_c f_c' b\right)$ substituted into $M_r = \phi_s f_y A_s\left(d - a/2\right)$ gives a quadratic in $A_s$; solving it for $M_r = M_f$: $$A_{s,req} = 309\ \text{mm}^2$$ Minimum reinforcement under Clause 10.5.1.2: $$A_{s,min} = \frac{0.2\sqrt{f_c'}\,b_t h}{f_y} = \frac{0.2(5)(250)(450)}{400} = 281\ \text{mm}^2$$ so the strength requirement governs, though only just.
  6. Choose bars and confirm the resistance. Provide 2-15M ($A_s = 400\ \text{mm}^2$) in one layer: $$a = \frac{0.85(400)(400)}{0.8125(0.65)(25)(250)} = 41.2\ \text{mm}, \quad c = \frac{a}{\beta_1} = 45.4\ \text{mm}$$ $$\boxed{M_r = 0.85(400)(400)\left(390.7 - \tfrac{41.2}{2}\right) = 50.3\ \text{kN}\!\cdot\!\text{m} > 39.3\ \text{kN}\!\cdot\!\text{m}}$$ The utilisation is 0.78. Two 15M bars at 250 mm width leave 128 mm clear between them, well above the greater of $1.4d_b$ and 30 mm required by Clause 6.6.5.2.
  7. Check that the section is under-reinforced. $$\frac{c}{d} = \frac{45.4}{390.7} = 0.116 \ll 0.5$$ The steel is far past yield at crushing, so the beam fails in a fully ductile manner with ample warning — which is what allows $\phi_s f_y$ to be used at all.
  8. Check shear. The critical section is at $d_v$ from the support face. Using the simplified method of Clause 11.3.6.3 for a member without transverse reinforcement: $$d_v = \max\left(0.9d,\ 0.72h\right) = \max(351.6,\ 324) = 351.6\ \text{mm}$$ $$\beta = \frac{230}{1000 + d_v} = 0.170$$ $$V_c = \phi_c\lambda\beta\sqrt{f_c'}\,b_w d_v = 0.65(1.0)(0.170)(5)(250)(351.6) = 48.6\ \text{kN}$$ The shear at $d$ from the support is 28.9 kN, so $V_f < V_c$ and Clause 11.2.8.1 does not require minimum stirrups. 10M stirrups at 175 mm are nonetheless provided over the outer third of each end and at 300 mm elsewhere, to hold the cage, to confine the anchorage zone and to give the section a reserve the calculation does not credit.
  9. Check deflection and detailing. $h = 450\ \text{mm}$ exceeds $L/16 = 281\ \text{mm}$, so Clause 9.8.2.1 waives the explicit deflection calculation for a simply supported beam not supporting brittle finishes. Extend both 15M bars the full span and anchor them past the support centre-line with a standard hook, since Clause 12.11.3 requires the development of $M_r/V_f$ at a simple support.
250 mm450 mm2-15M bottom250 x 450 reinforced concrete section10M stirrups at 175 mm over the end thirds, 300 mm elsewhere; 40 mm cover
Designed cross-section for B1: 250 x 450 mm, 25 MPa concrete, 2-15M tension steel.
ResultValue
Governing load combination$1.25D + 1.4W + 0.5L$, 15.54 kN/m uniform
Factored moment / shear39.3 kN·m / 36.2 kN
Cross-section250 mm x 450 mm, $f_c' = 25$ MPa
Effective depth390.7 mm
Flexural steel required / provided309 mm² / 400 mm² (2-15M)
$A_{s,min}$281 mm²
$M_r$50.3 kN·m, utilisation 0.78
$c/d$0.116 (ductile)
$V_c$ without stirrups48.6 kN against $V_f = 28.9$ kN at $d$
Shear reinforcement10M at 175 mm end thirds, 300 mm elsewhere (nominal)

Check — the wind load is taken as an additional vertical uniform load. Figure 3 lists WIND 3.6 kN/m inside the W1 group alongside the dead and live/snow intensities, and draws every arrow vertically downward, so the three are treated as three vertical load types on the same footprint. Both directions were checked: acting downward, wind produces the governing combination; acting upward, $0.9D + 1.4W$ leaves a net downward 1.44 kN/m, so no reversal of the moment occurs and no top steel is required for strength. If the wind were instead intended as a horizontal pressure on a member spanning vertically, the beam would be designed for biaxial bending, which the figure does not support.