NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

16-Civ-B3 Geotechnical Design · December 2013

Question 8 of 9: Overturning and sliding stability of a cantilever retaining wall

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. National Examinations, December 2013 — 98-Civ-B3 Geotechnical Design. Three hours, open book, any non-communicating calculator. Section A holds five 7-mark discussion questions (answer any four); Section B holds four 24-mark design questions (answer any three), so the examinable total is 4 × 7 + 3 × 24 = 100 marks. Every one of the nine questions is answered here, because the set is a study resource rather than a sitting.

Reference texts. B. M. Das, Principles of Foundation Engineering (9th ed.) and Principles of Geotechnical Engineering (9th ed.); Canadian Geotechnical Society, Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual (CFEM, 4th ed.) — the governing Canadian reference for foundation practice; R. F. Craig, Craig's Soil Mechanics (9th ed.); D. P. Coduto, Foundation Design: Principles and Practices (3rd ed.).

Sources of design charts and assumed values (paper Note 6). The paper requires every chart and assumed value to be identified. Bearing-capacity factors are Terzaghi’s (Das, Foundation Engineering, Table 3.1, with Nγ after Kumbhojkar 1993); the pile end-bearing factor Nq* is read from Meyerhof’s chart (Das Fig. 11.14) and cross-checked against Janbu’s closed-form expression; the adhesion factor α is Das Table 11.5 (Terzaghi, Peck & Mesri); the strain-influence distribution is Schmertmann, Hartman & Brown (1978). Assumed values — specific gravity of solids Gs = 2.65 for the Question 8 backfill, base friction δ = ⅔φ′ and base adhesion ca = ⅔c′ (CFEM §24), and a driving-parameter value K = 1.4K0 for a high-displacement driven pile (Das §11.11) — are flagged where they are used.
Check — Question 6 text and figure disagree. The printed text of Question 6 states a 1 m × 1 m square footing with γ = 20 kN/m³ and φ = 36°, while Figure 3 is drawn for a 2.5 m footing with γ = 18 kN/m³ and φ′ = 38°. The question text governs (it is the instruction to the candidate); the figure is used only for the embedment Df = 1.5 m and for the CPT modulus profile, which the text does not restate. The alternative reading is noted at the end of the answer.

Question 8: Overturning and sliding stability of a cantilever retaining wall (24 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given.

QuantityValue
Overall height / base thickness7.0 m / 0.9 m
Base width $B$1.8 + 3.0 = 4.8 m (toe 0.76 m, stem 1.04 m, heel 3.0 m)
Stem0.4 m at top, 1.04 m at base, back face vertical, 6.1 m high
Embedment of the toe1.0 m
Backfill$\gamma = 18$ kN/m$^3$, $\phi^{\prime} = 30^{\circ}$, $c^{\prime} = 0$, surface at $\beta = 8^{\circ}$
Surcharge on the backfill$q = 20$ kPa
Water table3.9 m below the top of the wall (2.2 m above the base slab)
Foundation soil$\gamma = 19$ kN/m$^3$, $\phi^{\prime} = 15^{\circ}$, $c^{\prime} = 15$ kPa
Concrete$\gamma_c = 23.5$ kN/m$^3$

Find. The factor of safety of the wall against overturning about the toe and against sliding along the base, both per metre run, together with a judgement on whether the section as drawn is acceptable.

q = 20 kPa8°1.80 m3.0 m0.9 m2.2 m3.9 m7.0 m0.40 m1.0 mγ = 18 kN/m³φ′ = 30°, c′ = 0γ = 19 kN/m³φ′ = 15°, c′ = 15 kPaγₜ = 23.5 kN/m³pressure on theheel plane (kPa)6.933.645.5+u = 30.4
Figure Q8 — the cantilever wall, the Rankine virtual back plane through the heel, and the pressure diagram on that plane. The blue line is the effective active pressure and the dashed purple line adds the hydrostatic pressure below the water table.

Approach. Take a vertical virtual plane through the back of the heel and treat the wall, the base and the wedge of soil standing on the heel as one rigid body; apply Rankine active pressure to that plane using effective stresses, add the hydrostatic water pressure and the base uplift separately, and take moments about the front bottom edge of the toe.

  1. Assume the density values the question asks for. Only the bulk unit weight of the backfill is given, but a saturated value is needed below the water table. Treating $\gamma = 18$ kN/m$^3$ as the dry unit weight and assuming a specific gravity of solids $G_s = 2.65$ — typical for a quartz sand — the void ratio and the saturated unit weight follow:$$\begin{aligned}e &= \frac{G_s\gamma_w}{\gamma_d} - 1 = \frac{2.65(9.81)}{18} - 1 = 0.444 \\ \gamma_{sat} &= \frac{G_s + e}{1+e}\gamma_w = \frac{2.65+0.444}{1.444}(9.81) = 21.02\ \text{kN/m}^3\end{aligned}$$$$\gamma^{\prime} = 21.02 - 9.81 = 11.21\ \text{kN/m}^3 .$$
  2. Geometry of the virtual back plane. The plane rises from the back bottom corner of the base, 4.8 m from the toe edge, to the backfill surface. Because the surface climbs at $\beta = 8^{\circ}$ across the 3.0 m heel, the plane is$$H^{\prime} = 7.0 + 3.0\tan 8^{\circ} = 7.0 + 0.422 = 7.422\ \text{m}$$high, and the water table stands 3.1 m above the underside of the base.
  3. Rankine active coefficient for a sloping backfill. With $c^{\prime} = 0$, $\phi^{\prime} = 30^{\circ}$ and $\beta = 8^{\circ}$,$$K_a = \cos\beta\,\frac{\cos\beta - \sqrt{\cos^2\beta - \cos^2\phi^{\prime}}}{\cos\beta + \sqrt{\cos^2\beta - \cos^2\phi^{\prime}}} = 0.99027\,\frac{0.99027 - 0.48024}{0.99027 + 0.48024} = 0.3435 .$$The resultant thrust on the plane acts parallel to the ground surface, i.e. inclined at $8^{\circ}$ below the horizontal.
  4. Effective active pressure at the three key levels. Working down the plane with $\sigma^{\prime}_a = K_a\sigma^{\prime}_v$:$$\begin{aligned}\text{surface } (z=0): & \quad \sigma^{\prime}_v = q = 20.0, & \sigma^{\prime}_a &= 6.87\ \text{kPa}\\\text{water table } (z=4.322): & \quad \sigma^{\prime}_v = 20.0 + 18(4.322) = 97.79, & \sigma^{\prime}_a &= 33.59\ \text{kPa}\\\text{base } (z=7.422): & \quad \sigma^{\prime}_v = 97.79 + 11.21(3.1) = 132.53, & \sigma^{\prime}_a &= 45.52\ \text{kPa}\end{aligned}$$
  5. Resultant earth thrust and its moment. Splitting the diagram into a rectangle and a triangle above the water table and again below it gives four components whose sum and first moment about the underside of the base are$$P_a = 29.69 + 57.73 + 104.12 + 18.50 = 210.03\ \text{kN/m},$$$$\textstyle\sum P_i h_i = 29.69(5.261) + 57.73(4.541) + 104.12(1.550) + 18.50(1.033) = 598.8\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m/m}.$$Resolving at $8^{\circ}$, the horizontal component is $P_h = 210.03\cos 8^{\circ} = 207.99$ kN/m with an overturning moment of $598.8\cos 8^{\circ} = 593.0$ kN·m/m, and the vertical component $P_v = 210.03\sin 8^{\circ} = 29.23$ kN/m acts downwards on the plane at $x = 4.8$ m from the toe.
  6. Water pressure on the back plane. Below the water table the pore pressure is hydrostatic and acts in addition to the effective earth pressure:$$P_w = \tfrac12\gamma_w h^2 = \tfrac12(9.81)(3.1)^2 = 47.14\ \text{kN/m} \quad \text{at } h/3 = 1.033\ \text{m above the base},$$giving an overturning moment of 48.7 kN·m/m.
  7. Uplift on the base. With water standing 3.1 m above the underside of the base at the heel and the toe side drained, the pore pressure on the base is taken to fall linearly from $\gamma_w(3.1) = 30.41$ kPa at the heel to zero at the toe:$$U = \tfrac12(30.41)(4.8) = 72.99\ \text{kN/m} \quad\text{acting at } x = \tfrac23(4.8) = 3.20\ \text{m from the toe},$$an overturning moment of 233.6 kN·m/m. Uplift is included because the foundation is a silty clay of finite permeability and no cut-off is shown; the effect of omitting it is quantified at the end.
  8. Total overturning moment about the toe.$$M_o = 593.0 + 48.7 + 233.6 = 875.2\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m/m}.$$
  9. Stabilising weights and their moments. The wall, the base and everything standing on the heel act about the same point:
ComponentVertical force (kN/m)Lever arm from toe (m)Moment (kN·m/m)
Stem, rectangular part 0.4 × 6.157.341.60091.7
Stem, tapered part (triangle)45.871.18754.4
Base slab 4.8 × 0.9101.522.400243.7
Backfill above the water table (3.0 × 3.9, $\gamma = 18$)210.603.300695.0
Sloping wedge of backfill (3.0 × 0.422, $\gamma = 18$)11.383.80043.3
Backfill below the water table (3.0 × 2.2, $\gamma_{sat} = 21.02$)138.723.300457.8
Surcharge on the heel (20 × 3.0)60.003.300198.0
Vertical component of $P_a$29.234.800140.3
Totals654.66—1924.1
  1. Factor of safety against overturning.$$FS_{overturning} = \frac{\sum M_R}{\sum M_O} = \frac{1924.1}{875.2}$$$$\boxed{FS_{overturning} = 2.20}$$which comfortably exceeds the usual requirement of 1.5 to 2.0.
  2. Effective normal force on the base. The uplift is subtracted from the total weight before any friction is claimed:$$N^{\prime} = \sum V - U = 654.66 - 72.99 = 581.7\ \text{kN/m}.$$
  3. Base shear resistance. Adopting the customary reductions $\delta = \tfrac23\phi^{\prime}_2 = 10^{\circ}$ and $c_a = \tfrac23 c^{\prime}_2 = 10$ kPa for a concrete base cast against the silty clay,$$F_R = N^{\prime}\tan\delta + c_a B = 581.7(0.1763) + 10.0(4.8) = 102.6 + 48.0 = 150.6\ \text{kN/m}.$$
  4. Passive resistance in front of the toe. Over the 1.0 m of embedment, with $K_p = \tan^2(45^{\circ} + 7.5^{\circ}) = 1.698$,$$P_p = \tfrac12 K_p\gamma_2 D^2 + 2c^{\prime}_2\sqrt{K_p}\,D = \tfrac12(1.698)(19)(1.0)^2 + 2(15)(1.303)(1.0) = 16.1 + 39.1 = 55.2\ \text{kN/m}.$$
  5. Factor of safety against sliding. The driving force is the horizontal earth thrust plus the water thrust, $F_D = 207.99 + 47.14 = 255.1$ kN/m, so$$FS_{sliding} = \frac{F_R + P_p}{F_D} = \frac{150.6 + 55.2}{255.1}$$$$\boxed{FS_{sliding} = 0.81 \quad (0.59 \text{ if } P_p \text{ is neglected})}$$
  6. Position of the resultant and base pressures. The net moment about the toe places the resultant at$$\begin{aligned}\bar{x} &= \frac{\sum M_R - \sum M_O}{N^{\prime}} = \frac{1924.1-875.2}{581.7} = 1.803\ \text{m} \\ e &= \frac{B}{2} - \bar{x} = 2.40 - 1.80 = 0.597\ \text{m}\end{aligned}$$which is inside the middle third ($B/6 = 0.80$ m), so the whole base stays in compression with $q_{max} = 211.6$ kPa at the toe and $q_{min} = 30.8$ kPa at the heel. Those are high for a $\phi^{\prime} = 15^{\circ}$, $c^{\prime} = 15$ kPa foundation and the bearing capacity would also have to be checked.
  7. Assessment and remedy. The wall is safe against overturning but fails in sliding by a wide margin, and the reason is visible in the numbers: the water standing in the backfill contributes 47.1 kN/m of thrust and 73.0 kN/m of uplift, while the foundation offers only $\tan 10^{\circ}$ of friction. Even with a fully drained backfill the factor of safety only reaches 0.98, so drainage alone is not enough. Two measures are needed. First, install a full-height granular or geocomposite drain against the stem discharging through weep holes, which removes $P_w$ and most of the uplift. Second, cast a shear key under the base so that sliding is forced through the soil rather than along the concrete interface (raising the available strength to $N^{\prime}\tan\phi^{\prime}_2 + c^{\prime}_2 B = 227.9$ kN/m) and so that the passive block is deepened; a key taking the effective embedment to about 2.1 m, i.e. roughly 1.1 m deep, restores $FS_{sliding} \ge 1.5$. Widening the heel would also help, since it recruits more backfill weight without increasing the thrust.
QuantityValue
Assumed saturated / buoyant unit weight of backfill21.02 / 11.21 kN/m$^3$
Rankine active coefficient $K_a$ ($\beta = 8^{\circ}$)0.3435
Active thrust $P_a$ on the heel plane210.0 kN/m at $8^{\circ}$
Horizontal / vertical components $P_h$, $P_v$208.0 / 29.2 kN/m
Water thrust $P_w$47.1 kN/m
Base uplift $U$73.0 kN/m
Total overturning moment about the toe875.2 kN·m/m
Total resisting moment about the toe1924.1 kN·m/m
$FS$ against overturning2.20 — acceptable
Effective normal force on the base $N^{\prime}$581.7 kN/m
Base resistance $F_R$ / passive $P_p$ / driving $F_D$150.6 / 55.2 / 255.1 kN/m
$FS$ against sliding0.81 — inadequate, a key and drainage are required
Eccentricity $e$ (middle third is $\pm$0.80 m)0.597 m — within the middle third
Base pressures $q_{max}$ / $q_{min}$211.6 / 30.8 kPa
Check — assumptions made (paper Notes 1 and 6). (i) $G_s = 2.65$ and $\gamma = 18$ kN/m$^3$ read as a dry unit weight, to obtain $\gamma_{sat} = 21.02$ kN/m$^3$. (ii) The base dimensions are read as toe 0.76 m + stem 1.04 m = 1.8 m, plus a 3.0 m heel, giving $B = 4.8$ m; the figure’s 1.8 m and 3 m dimensions are the ones drawn to the base edges. (iii) Uplift is assumed to vary linearly from full head at the heel to zero at the drained toe. Omitting uplift altogether would give $FS_{overturning} = 3.00$ and $FS_{sliding} = 0.86$ — the sliding conclusion is unchanged. (iv) $\delta = \tfrac23\phi^{\prime}$ and $c_a = \tfrac23 c^{\prime}$ follow CFEM practice for concrete cast against soil.