Question 9 of 9: Width of a square footing for a short-term factor of safety of 2
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. Professional Engineers Ontario /
Engineers Canada National Examinations, May 2014 — 98-Civ-B3 Geotechnical Design.
Three hours, OPEN BOOK, non-communicating calculator. Section A carries five
discussion questions of 7 marks each (answer any four); Section B carries four design
questions of 24 marks each (answer any three); the examinable total is
4 × 7 + 3 × 24 = 100 marks. All nine questions are worked below, because
the set is a study resource rather than a timed attempt.
B. M. Das, Principles of Foundation Engineering, 9th ed. — bearing
capacity (Ch. 3), consolidation settlement (Ch. 5), retaining walls (Ch. 8), pile
foundations (Ch. 11), drilled shafts and bored piles (Ch. 12).
B. M. Das, Principles of Geotechnical Engineering, 9th ed. — shear
strength (Ch. 12), slope stability (Ch. 15), subsurface exploration (Ch. 17).
Canadian Geotechnical Society, Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual
(CFEM), 4th ed. — the governing Canadian practice document for site
investigation, bearing resistance, pile design and retaining structures.
R. F. Craig, Craig's Soil Mechanics, 8th ed. — earth pressure and
slope stability.
J. E. Bowles, Foundation Analysis and Design, 5th ed. — bearing
capacity factors and retaining-wall stability tables.
Sources of charts and assumed values (page-1 Note 6). Note 6 of this
paper requires the candidate to identify the source of every design chart and every
assumed value. The values imported into the solutions below are, in full:
bearing-capacity factors Nc = 5.7 (Terzaghi strip, phi = 0) and
5.14 (Meyerhof / Prandtl, phi = 0), Das Foundation Engineering Table 3.1 and
Eq. 3.19; shape and depth factors from De Beer and Hansen as tabulated in Das Table 3.4;
the adhesion factor alpha = 0.45 for bored piles in stiff clay, Skempton (1959) as
reproduced in CFEM Ch. 18; the end-bearing coefficient Nc* = 9
for piles in clay, Skempton (1951); the compression index correlation
Cc = 0.009(LL − 10), Terzaghi and Peck (1967); and a
specific gravity Gs = 2.70 where a void ratio had to be
back-figured. Each is repeated at the point of use.
Question 9: Width of a square footing for a short-term factor of safety of 2
(24 marks)
Adopted 1.0 m square footing at 2.0 m depth. The bearing-capacity mechanism reaches only about 3 m below ground, well above the stable water table.
Given. A column load carried on a square footing founded 2.0 m below
ground in a normally consolidated soil.
Question 9 — data
Quantity
Symbol
Value
Vertical column load
Q
600 kN
Founding depth
Df
2.0 m
Bulk unit weight
γ
19 kN/m3
Effective cohesion and friction angle (long term)
c', φ'
0.5 kPa and 36 degrees
Undrained cohesion
cu
150 kPa
Undrained friction angle
φu
0
Groundwater table
—
7.0 to 8.0 m below ground, stable
Required short-term factor of safety
FS
2.0
Find. The width B of the square footing at which the short-term
(undrained) factor of safety is exactly 2, using Meyerhof's general bearing-capacity
analysis.
Approach. Write the general bearing-capacity equation for the
undrained case, in which phiu = 0 makes
Nγ = 0 and Nq = 1; note that the depth factor contains B, so
the equation for B is implicit and must be iterated; solve it, adopt a practical width,
and confirm the drained case does not govern.
Reduce the general equation to the undrained case. Meyerhof's general
equation is
$$q_u = cN_cF_{cs}F_{cd}F_{ci}+qN_qF_{qs}F_{qd}F_{qi}
+\tfrac{1}{2}\gamma BN_{\gamma}F_{\gamma s}F_{\gamma d}F_{\gamma i}.$$
With $\phi_u = 0$ the factors are $N_c = 5.14$, $N_q = 1$ and
$N_{\gamma} = 0$; the load is vertical so all inclination factors are unity; and
$F_{qs} = 1+(B/L)\tan\phi = 1$ and $F_{qd} = 1$ for phi = 0. The whole third term
disappears and the second reduces to the surcharge itself.
Evaluate the surcharge and the shape factor. The overburden removed
at founding level is
$$q = \gamma D_f = 19(2.0) = 38.0\ \text{kPa},$$
and for a square footing, B/L = 1, De Beer's shape factor is
$$F_{cs} = 1+\left(\frac{B}{L}\right)\left(\frac{N_q}{N_c}\right)
= 1+\frac{1}{5.14} = 1.195 .$$
Write the depth factor, which is where B enters. Hansen's depth
factor for phi = 0 is
$$F_{cd} = 1+0.4\left(\frac{D_f}{B}\right)\ \text{for } \frac{D_f}{B}\le 1,
\qquad F_{cd} = 1+0.4\tan^{-1}\!\left(\frac{D_f}{B}\right)\ \text{for }
\frac{D_f}{B}\gt 1,$$
with the inverse tangent in radians. Because B is unknown, this term makes the design
equation implicit.
Form the design equation. Working in net terms, which is the
convention for a footing that replaces soil it displaces, the net ultimate bearing
capacity is
$$q_{u(net)} = q_u - q = c_uN_cF_{cs}F_{cd} = 150(5.14)(1.195)F_{cd} = 921.0\,F_{cd}
\ \text{kPa},$$
and the net applied pressure is $Q/B^{2}$. Setting the factor of safety to 2,
$$FS = \frac{q_{u(net)}}{Q/B^{2}} = 2 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad
B^{2} = \frac{2Q}{921.0\,F_{cd}(B)} = \frac{1200}{921.0\,F_{cd}(B)} .$$
Iterate. Starting from a trial B = 1.0 m:
Iteration on the footing width
Trial B (m)
Df/B
Fcd
qu(net) (kPa)
New B (m)
1.000
2.000
1.4429
1328.8
0.950
0.950
2.105
1.4507
1336.1
0.948
0.948
2.110
1.4511
1336.5
0.948
The iteration converges after two cycles to
$$\boxed{B_{required} = 0.95\ \text{m}}$$
Adopt a practical width and confirm the factor of safety. Footings
are dimensioned in round increments, so adopt a 1.0 m square footing. At B = 1.0 m,
$F_{cd} = 1.443$, $q_{u(net)} = 1328.8$ kPa and the applied net pressure is
$600/1.0^{2} = 600$ kPa, giving
$$FS = \frac{1328.8}{600} = 2.21 \;\ge\; 2.0 \quad\text{(satisfactory).}$$
On a gross basis the same footing gives
$q_u = 1328.8+38.0 = 1366.8$ kPa against a gross applied pressure of 638 kPa, i.e. a gross
factor of safety of 2.14, so the conclusion does not depend on which convention is
used.
Confirm that the long-term case does not govern. Once the clay
drains, $c^{\prime} \approx 0$ and $\phi^{\prime} = 36^{\circ}$, for which
$$N_q = e^{\pi\tan\phi^{\prime}}\tan^{2}\!\left(45+\frac{\phi^{\prime}}{2}\right) = 37.75,
\qquad N_c = (N_q-1)\cot\phi^{\prime} = 50.59,$$
$$N_{\gamma} = (N_q-1)\tan(1.4\phi^{\prime}) = 44.43 .$$
With the corresponding shape and depth factors at B = 1.0 m the gross ultimate capacity is
about 3464 kPa, so the drained net factor of safety is roughly 5.7. The short-term case
governs, as the question implies.
Check the water table. The zone that carries the bearing-capacity
mechanism extends about B below founding level, i.e. to 3.0 m depth, whereas the water
table is stable at 7.0 to 8.0 m. No groundwater correction to
q or to the self-weight term is required, and none has been applied.
A 0.95 m footing under a 600 kN column is small, which is exactly what a 150 kPa
undrained strength implies: this is a stiff clay and capacity is generous. That makes it
worth stating explicitly that the question asks only for bearing capacity. At an applied
pressure of 600 kPa the immediate and consolidation settlement of a 1.0 m footing on this
clay would need checking before the design could be issued, and on a stiff clay of this
strength it is usually settlement or the structural design of the pad that fixes the final
dimension.