16-Civ-B5 Water Supply and Wastewater Treatment · December 2017
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Paper format. National Examination, December 2017 — 16-Civ-B5 Water Supply and Wastewater Treatment. Three hours; closed book with one aid sheet written on both sides; an approved calculator is permitted. Question 1 is compulsory and the candidate attempts any three of the remaining four questions. Every question carries 25 marks, so the paper is marked out of 100. A partial-flow chart for circular pipes is supplied on page 3 for use in Question 5. All five questions are solved below, because the set is a study resource rather than an exam script.
Reference texts for this subject.
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
Given.
| Symbol | Quantity | Value |
|---|---|---|
| D | Internal pipe diameter | 600 mm = 0.600 m |
| Δz | Drop in invert elevation | 0.500 m |
| L | Length over which the invert drops | 100 m |
| S | Slope of the energy grade line (uniform flow) | 0.500 / 100 = 0.005 |
| d | Depth of flow | 200 mm = 0.200 m |
| n | Manning roughness coefficient | 0.013 |
Find. The discharge q and the mean velocity v carried by the sewer at that depth, using the partial-flow (hydraulic-elements) curves supplied with the paper.
Approach. Compute the full-flow discharge and velocity from Manning's equation, read the discharge and velocity ratios off the supplied partial-flow curves at the depth ratio d/D, multiply, and then confirm the chart read by evaluating the circular-section geometry exactly.
The sewer flows by gravity, and for uniform flow the water surface, the energy line and the invert are all parallel, so the friction slope equals the pipe slope:
$$S = \frac{\Delta z}{L} = \frac{0.500}{100} = 0.005 \quad (0.5\ \%,\ \text{or}\ 1\ \mathrm{in}\ 200)$$This is a steep sanitary sewer — comfortably above the 0.1 % minimum grade normally specified for a 600 mm pipe — which is the first hint that the velocity check later in the solution will pass easily.
The reference condition for the chart is the pipe flowing just full, for which the geometry is elementary:
$$A_{\text{full}} = \frac{\pi D^{2}}{4} = \frac{\pi (0.600)^{2}}{4} = 0.2827\ \mathrm{m^2}, \qquad R_{\text{full}} = \frac{D}{4} = 0.150\ \mathrm{m}$$The hydraulic radius of a full circular pipe is D/4 because the area πD2/4 divided by the perimeter πD reduces to it directly.
Manning's equation in SI units gives the mean velocity of uniform flow in terms of the hydraulic radius and the friction slope:
$$V = \frac{1}{n} R^{2/3} S^{1/2} = \frac{1}{0.013}\,(0.150)^{2/3}(0.005)^{1/2} = 76.92 \times 0.2823 \times 0.07071$$and the full-flow discharge follows from continuity, Q = VA:
$$\boxed{\ V_{\text{full}} = 1.536\ \mathrm{m/s}, \qquad Q_{\text{full}} = 1.536 \times 0.2827 = 0.4341\ \mathrm{m^3/s} = 434\ \mathrm{L/s}\ }$$The chart supplied with the paper plots d/D against the ratios q/Q and v/V. Here
$$\frac{d}{D} = \frac{200}{600} = 0.333$$Reading horizontally at d/D = 0.333 to each curve and dropping to the horizontal axis gives
$$\frac{q}{Q} \approx 0.24, \qquad \frac{v}{V} \approx 0.82$$Note how differently the two behave: at one third of the depth the pipe carries only a quarter of its capacity, yet the water is already moving at more than four fifths of its full-bore speed. That is because the hydraulic radius — which sets the velocity — recovers much faster with depth than the flow area does.
Multiplying the ratios by the full-flow values,
$$q = 0.24 \times 0.4341 = 0.104\ \mathrm{m^3/s}, \qquad v = 0.82 \times 1.536 = 1.26\ \mathrm{m/s}$$ $$\boxed{\ q \approx 0.104\ \mathrm{m^3/s} = 104\ \mathrm{L/s} \approx 9000\ \mathrm{m^3/d}, \qquad v \approx 1.26\ \mathrm{m/s}\ }$$A chart read is worth checking, and the geometry is closed-form. With the wetted arc subtending an angle θ at the centre,
$$\theta = 2\arccos\!\left(1 - \frac{2d}{D}\right) = 2\arccos(0.3333) = 2.462\ \mathrm{rad} = 141.1^\circ$$ $$A = \frac{D^{2}}{8}(\theta - \sin\theta) = \frac{0.36}{8}\,(2.462 - 0.6285) = 0.08250\ \mathrm{m^2}$$ $$P = \frac{\theta D}{2} = \frac{2.462 \times 0.600}{2} = 0.7386\ \mathrm{m} \quad\Longrightarrow\quad R = \frac{A}{P} = 0.1117\ \mathrm{m}$$Applying Manning at this hydraulic radius and multiplying by the partial area,
$$v = \frac{1}{0.013}(0.1117)^{2/3}(0.005)^{1/2} = 1.262\ \mathrm{m/s}, \qquad q = 1.262 \times 0.08250 = 0.1041\ \mathrm{m^3/s}$$which corresponds to q/Q = 0.240 and v/V = 0.822 — agreeing with the chart read to within the width of a pencil line, and confirming that the supplied curves are the constant-n (Manning) family.
Having the depth-averaged velocity, the sewer's adequacy can be judged rather than merely reported. The boundary shear stress is
$$\tau_0 = \rho g R S = 1000 \times 9.81 \times 0.1117 \times 0.005 = 5.48\ \mathrm{Pa}$$which is well above the 1.5 Pa normally required for self-cleansing on 1 mm grit and above the 3–4 Pa needed to scour a consolidated deposit, so this reach is self-cleansing at the stated flow. The velocity of 1.26 m/s likewise sits between the 0.6–0.75 m/s minimum and the 3 m/s abrasion limit. The Froude number, using the hydraulic depth Dh = A/T with top width T = D sin(θ/2) = 0.566 m, is
$$Fr = \frac{v}{\sqrt{g D_h}} = \frac{1.262}{\sqrt{9.81 \times 0.1458}} = 1.05$$which is essentially critical — a point worth flagging, since flow near Fr = 1 is prone to standing waves and depth instability. Finally, the chart itself shows that maximum discharge occurs not at full bore but at d/D = 0.938, where q/Q = 1.076; a sewer running just below the crown carries about 8 % more than one running full, because the wetted perimeter closes faster than the area near the crown.
| Quantity | Symbol | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Slope of sewer | S | 0.005 (1 in 200) |
| Full-flow area / hydraulic radius | Afull, Rfull | 0.2827 m2, 0.150 m |
| Full-flow velocity | V | 1.54 m/s |
| Full-flow discharge | Q | 0.434 m3/s = 434 L/s |
| Depth ratio | d/D | 0.333 |
| Ratios read from the curves | q/Q, v/V | 0.24, 0.82 (exact geometry: 0.240, 0.822) |
| Discharge at 200 mm depth | q | 0.104 m3/s = 104 L/s ≈ 9000 m3/d |
| Velocity at 200 mm depth | v | 1.26 m/s |
| Boundary shear stress | τ0 | 5.48 Pa — self-cleansing (> 1.5 Pa) and scouring (> 4 Pa) |
| Froude number | Fr | 1.05 — essentially critical flow |
Check: the solution assumes steady uniform flow, so that the friction slope equals the invert slope, and a constant Manning n = 0.013 independent of depth, which is the family of curves the paper supplies. Some texts print the variable-n chart, on which n rises by up to 30 % at shallow depths; on that chart the same d/D would give q/Q ≈ 0.21 and v/V ≈ 0.71, i.e. q ≈ 91 L/s and v ≈ 1.09 m/s. The exact-geometry cross-check in Step 6 confirms the supplied chart is the constant-n family, so the boxed values stand. The computed Froude number of 1.05 places the flow at the critical point; in design this reach would be reviewed for standing waves, and a small change in slope or roughness would move it clear.