NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

22-Elec-A2 Systems and Control · December 2014

Question 1 of 8: Frequency-response & Routh stability of a proportional loop (compulsory)

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. National Exams, 07-Elec-A2 Systems & Control, December 2014, 3 hours, closed book (approved Casio/Sharp calculator plus one signed, double-sided 8.5 × 11" formula sheet). Questions 1 and 2 are compulsory; a complete paper is five questions, so candidates choose three of Q3–Q8. Each question is worth 20 marks. All eight are worked below so the set is a complete study resource.

Reference texts: N. S. Nise, Control Systems Engineering (7th ed., Wiley) — time response and second-order specs (Ch. 4), Routh–Hurwitz stability (Ch. 6), steady-state error and error constants (Ch. 7), root locus (Ch. 8), PID and lead/lag design (Ch. 9–11), frequency response, Bode, Nyquist, gain and phase margins (Ch. 10–11), state space, controllability/observability and pole placement (Ch. 3, 12); K. Ogata, Modern Control Engineering (5th ed., Prentice Hall) — dominant-poles modelling and Mason’s rule; G. F. Franklin, J. D. Powell & A. Emami-Naeini, Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems. All block diagrams, pole–zero maps, root loci, Bode plots and signal-flow graphs below are redrawn as inline figures.

Reading the exam figures. Q1 supplies open- and closed-loop Bode plots and Q6 supplies uncompensated/compensated open-loop Bode plots. Where a transfer function is stated exactly in the text, every graphical reading is also confirmed analytically and the exact model governs; where only a plot is given (Q6), the values are read from the printed curves and flagged as such.

Question 1 — Frequency-response & Routh stability of a proportional loop (compulsory) [20]

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. Unit-feedback loop, open loop $L(s)=K_p\,G(s)$ with $G(s)=\dfrac{100}{s(s+5)^2}$: poles at $0,-5,-5$; no finite zeros; one free integrator.

Find. GM, PM, $\omega_{cg}$ (phase-crossover) and $\omega_{cp}$ (gain-crossover); $K_{crit}$, $\omega_{osc}$; stable range of $K_p$; and the Type 1 error constants at $K_p=1$.

[Figure not reproduced: Figure Q1.1 redrawn — proportional unit-feedback loop. See the official exam paper.]

Part 1 — Frequency-response margins & critical gain

Approach. The phase-crossover frequency (where $\angle L=-180^\circ$) fixes the gain margin and the marginal gain; the gain-crossover frequency (where $|L|=1$) fixes the phase margin.

Open-loop Bode of K_pG(s), K_p = 1-160-140-120-100-80-60-40-2002040Magnitude (dB)-270-225-180-135-9010^-110^010^110^210^3Phase (deg)Frequency (rad/s)ω_pc=5.00
Open-loop Bode at $K_p=1$: $|L|=1$ near $\omega_{cp}\approx2.96$ rad/s; $\angle L=-180^\circ$ at $\omega_{cg}=5$ rad/s.
  1. Phase-crossover frequency. $\angle L(j\omega)=-90^\circ-2\arctan(\omega/5)$. Setting this to $-180^\circ$ gives $\arctan(\omega/5)=45^\circ$, so $\boxed{\omega_{cg}=5\ \text{rad/s}}$.
  2. Gain margin. $|L(j\omega)|=\dfrac{100}{\omega(\omega^2+25)}$; at $\omega=5$, $|L|=\dfrac{100}{5(50)}=0.4$. Hence $\text{GM}=\dfrac{1}{0.4}=\boxed{2.5\ \text{V/V}=7.96\ \text{dB}}$.
  3. Critical gain & oscillation frequency. Marginal stability occurs when $K_p|L|=1$ at $\omega_{cg}$: $K_{crit}=\text{GM}=\boxed{2.5}$ with $\boxed{\omega_{osc}=5\ \text{rad/s}}$.
  4. Gain-crossover frequency & phase margin. Solving $|L|=1\Rightarrow\omega^3+25\omega-100=0$ gives $\omega_{cp}=2.96$ rad/s. There $\angle L=-90^\circ-2\arctan(2.96/5)=-151.3^\circ$, so $\text{PM}=180^\circ-151.3^\circ=\boxed{28.7^\circ}$.
  5. Stable range. The loop is stable for gains below the critical value: $\boxed{0\lt K_p\lt2.5}$.

Part 2 — Routh–Hurwitz verification

Approach. Form the closed-loop characteristic polynomial, build the Routh array, and set the $s^1$ row to zero; the $s^2$-row auxiliary equation gives $\omega_{osc}$.

  1. Characteristic polynomial. With $s(s+5)^2=s^3+10s^2+25s$, $1+K_pG=0$ gives $$s^3+10s^2+25s+100K_p=0.$$
  2. Routh array. $$\begin{array}{c|cc}s^3&1&25\\ s^2&10&100K_p\\ s^1&\frac{250-100K_p}{10}&0\\ s^0&100K_p&\end{array}$$
  3. Marginal stability. The $s^1$ entry vanishes when $250-100K_p=0$, i.e. $\boxed{K_{crit}=2.5}$.
  4. Oscillation frequency. The $s^2$-row auxiliary equation $10s^2+100K_{crit}=0$ gives $s^2=-25$, so $\boxed{\omega_{osc}=5\ \text{rad/s}}$.
  5. Comparison. Identical to Part 1 — both methods give $K_{crit}=2.5$, $\omega_{osc}=5$ rad/s and the range $0\lt K_p\lt2.5$.

Part 3 — System Type & steady-state errors ($K_p=1$)

Approach. The single open-loop integrator makes the system Type 1; evaluate the three static error constants.

  1. System Type. $L(s)$ has one pole at the origin $\Rightarrow$ $\boxed{\text{Type 1}}$.
  2. Error constants. $K_{pos}=\lim_{s\to0}L=\infty$; $K_v=\lim_{s\to0}sL=\dfrac{100}{25}=\boxed{4.0}$; $K_a=\lim_{s\to0}s^2L=0$.
  3. Steady-state errors. $e_{ss}(\text{step})=\dfrac{1}{1+K_{pos}}=0$; $e_{ss}(\text{ramp})=\dfrac{1}{K_v}=\boxed{0.25}$; $e_{ss}(\text{parabola})=\dfrac{1}{K_a}=\infty$.
QuantityResult
Gain margin$2.5$ V/V $=7.96$ dB at $\omega_{cg}=5$ rad/s
Phase margin$28.7^\circ$ at $\omega_{cp}=2.96$ rad/s
$K_{crit}$, $\omega_{osc}$$2.5$, $5$ rad/s (freq. & Routh agree)
Stable range$\boxed{0\lt K_p\lt2.5}$
Type / $K_v$ / $e_{ss}$(ramp)Type 1 / $4.0$ / $0.25$
← Paper overview