22-Elec-B10 Electro-Optical Engineering · December 2017
Question 5 of 7: Longitudinal LiNbO$_3$ Pockels-cell modulator — half-wave voltage, $R$ and $C$, and drive power
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. 16-Elec-B10, Electro-Optical Engineering —
National Exams, December 2017. Three hours, closed book; one 8.5 in × 11 in
double-sided sheet of hand-written notes and a Casio or Sharp approved calculator are
permitted. Seven questions, all of equal value (20 marks each); the rubric says
any five questions constitute a complete paper. All seven are solved below,
because the set is a study resource rather than a timed sitting.
Reference texts.
G. Keiser, Optical Fiber Communications, 4th ed. — fibre modes,
dispersion, link power and rise-time budgets, photodetectors.
J. M. Senior, Optical Fiber Communications: Principles and Practice, 3rd ed.
— numerical aperture, intermodal/intramodal dispersion, receiver noise.
B. E. A. Saleh and M. C. Teich, Fundamentals of Photonics, 3rd ed. —
laser rate equations, photon lifetime, electro-optic modulators.
J. Wilson and J. F. B. Hawkes, Optoelectronics: An Introduction, 3rd ed.
— pin and avalanche photodiodes, Pockels cells.
Physical constants are the ones printed on page 1 of the examination paper:
$c = 2.998\times10^{8}\ \text{m/s}$, $q = 1.602\times10^{-19}\ \text{C}$,
$h = 6.626\times10^{-34}\ \text{J}\cdot\text{s}$,
$k = 1.381\times10^{-23}\ \text{J/K}$,
$\varepsilon_{0} = 8.854\times10^{-12}\ \text{F/m}$, and for the modulator crystal
$\varepsilon_{r}(\text{LiNbO}_3) = 32$, $n_{o} = 2.30$, $r = 30\ \text{pm/V}$.
Check: two book-keeping notes on the source paper.
The page-5 marking scheme lists five sub-parts, (a)–(e), for Questions 5 and 7, but
the printed questions on pages 3 and 4 carry only four sub-parts each; the mark totals
still come to 20, so the extra row is a marking-sheet artefact and every printed sub-part
is answered here. Question 6 also carries the hand-added annotation
“rework this one” next to its heading — an examiner’s note on the
printed paper, not part of the question. It is solved exactly as printed.
Question 5: Longitudinal LiNbO$_3$ Pockels-cell modulator — half-wave
voltage, $R$ and $C$, and drive power (20 marks)
Given. A longitudinal (field parallel to the beam) lithium-niobate
Pockels cell, with the crystal constants taken from page 1 of the paper.
Given data — Question 5
Quantity
Symbol
Value
Operating wavelength (HeNe red line)
$\lambda$
624 nm
Crystal diameter
$D$
20 mm
Crystal length = electrode gap
$L$
30 mm
$RC$-limited bandwidth
$f_{3\text{dB}}$
1.0 MHz
Electro-optic coefficient (page 1)
$r$
30 pm/V
Ordinary index (page 1)
$n_{o}$
2.30
Relative permittivity (page 1)
$\varepsilon_{r}$
32
Find. A labelled sketch with the required external optics and drive, the
half-wave voltage, the crystal capacitance and the load resistance that gives the stated
bandwidth, and the electrical drive power.
Longitudinal Pockels-cell amplitude modulator. Transparent ring electrodes on the end faces apply the field along the beam; the crossed polarizer/analyser pair converts the voltage-induced birefringence into an intensity change.
(a) Arrangement and operation
The beam passes in sequence through a polarizer, the electro-optic crystal, and
an analyser crossed with respect to the polarizer. The polarizer is oriented at
45° to the crystal’s induced principal axes so that it launches equal components on
the fast and slow axes. Transparent ring (or thin-film) electrodes on the two end faces
apply the modulating voltage along the direction of propagation — that is what
makes the geometry longitudinal — and the drive source feeds them through a load
resistor $R$, the crystal itself providing the parallel-plate capacitance $C$.
Applying a voltage changes the refractive index linearly through the Pockels effect,
$n = n_{o} - \tfrac{1}{2}r n_{o}^{3}\mathcal{E}$ (the relation printed on page 1), so the two
polarisation components accumulate a relative phase retardation
$\Gamma = 2\pi r n_{o}^{3} V/\lambda$ that depends only on the applied
voltage, not on the crystal length, because the longer path and the weaker field
cancel exactly. The analyser converts that retardation into a transmitted intensity
$T = \sin^{2}(\Gamma/2)$: at $V = 0$ the light is blocked and at $V = V_{\pi}$ it is fully
transmitted, which is precisely the on/off behaviour wanted for digital amplitude pulse
modulation. For analogue use a quarter-wave plate is added to bias the cell to the
half-transmission point, where the response is most nearly linear.
(b) to (d) — the numbers
Approach. The half-wave voltage follows from the retardation
expression; the capacitance is the parallel-plate value of the crystal itself; $R$ then
follows from the specified $RC$ bandwidth; and the drive power is the power the source
delivers to $R$ when swinging a sinusoid of amplitude $V_{\pi}$.
Half-wave voltage. Setting the retardation to $\pi$ in
$\Gamma = 2\pi r n_{o}^{3}V/\lambda$ gives the standard longitudinal result
$$V_{\pi} = \frac{\lambda}{2\,n_{o}^{3}\,r}
= \frac{624\times10^{-9}}{2\,(2.30)^{3}(30\times10^{-12})}
= \frac{624\times10^{-9}}{7.300\times10^{-10}}$$
$$\boxed{V_{\pi} = 855\ \text{V}}$$
Note it does not depend on $L$ or $D$: in the longitudinal geometry the field is
$V/L$ and the interaction length is $L$, so the geometry cancels. This high drive voltage is
the well-known drawback of longitudinal cells, and the reason integrated modulators use the
transverse geometry, where $V_{\pi}$ is scaled down by the aspect ratio $d/L$.
Electrode area and crystal capacitance. The end faces are circular of
diameter 20 mm, so
$$A = \frac{\pi D^{2}}{4} = \frac{\pi (0.020)^{2}}{4} = 3.142\times10^{-4}\ \text{m}^{2}$$
and, treating the crystal as a parallel-plate capacitor whose plate separation is its own
length,
$$C = \frac{\varepsilon_{0}\varepsilon_{r}A}{L}
= \frac{(8.854\times10^{-12})(32)(3.142\times10^{-4})}{0.030}$$
$$\boxed{C = 2.97\ \text{pF}}$$
Load resistance for the stated bandwidth. The modulator is a
single-pole $RC$ network, so $f_{3\text{dB}} = 1/(2\pi RC)$ and
$$R = \frac{1}{2\pi f_{3\text{dB}} C}
= \frac{1}{2\pi (1.0\times10^{6})(2.967\times10^{-12})}$$
$$\boxed{R = 53.6\ \text{k}\Omega}$$
A larger $R$ would give more voltage swing for a given drive current but would slow the
cell; this value is the one that lands the pole exactly at 1.0 MHz.
Drive power. A sinusoidal supply of peak amplitude $V_{\pi}$ (the
minimum needed to reach full transmission on each cycle) has r.m.s. value
$V_{\pi}/\sqrt{2}$, and the power is dissipated in the load resistance:
$$P = \frac{V_{\text{rms}}^{2}}{R} = \frac{V_{\pi}^{2}}{2R}
= \frac{(854.8)^{2}}{2(53.64\times10^{3})}$$
$$\boxed{P = 6.8\ \text{W}}$$
Nearly 7 W to modulate a milliwatt-class HeNe beam at only 1 MHz is a striking figure, and
it is the honest reason bulk longitudinal Pockels cells are used for Q-switching and pulse
gating rather than for continuous high-rate modulation.
Check: the drive-power convention. The power quoted
is the average dissipated in the load resistance $R$ by a sinusoid of peak
amplitude $V_{\pi}$, i.e. $P = V_{\pi}^{2}/2R$. Some texts instead quote the reactive power
needed to charge and discharge the crystal capacitance,
$P = \tfrac{1}{2}CV_{\pi}^{2}f$, or assume $V_{\pi}$ is the r.m.s. value (which doubles the
answer to 13.6 W). The convention used is stated here so the marker can follow it; the
physics — that the power scales as $V_{\pi}^{2}$ and hence as $\lambda^{2}$ — is
unaffected.