NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

22-Elec-B8 Power Electronics and Drives · December 2016

Question 6 of 6: Types of DC Drive, and a Bridge-Fed Separately Excited DC Motor

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. National Exams, December 2016 — 07-Elec-B8 Power Electronics and Drives. Open-book, 3 hours, six problems (PROBLEM 1–6) of equal value; the rubric marks only the first five answered. Every problem is solved here, because the set is intended as a study resource.

Reference texts. M. H. Rashid, Power Electronics: Circuits, Devices and Applications, 4th ed. (the EGBC-recommended primary reference for this code); N. Mohan, T. Undeland and W. Robbins, Power Electronics: Converters, Applications and Design, 3rd ed.; B. K. Bose, Modern Power Electronics and AC Drives; R. Krishnan, Electric Motor Drives: Modeling, Analysis and Control.

Conventions used throughout. Angles are electrical degrees measured from the positive-going zero crossing of the supply. For a phase-controlled converter feeding an R–L load the load angle is $\varphi=\tan^{-1}(X/R)=\cos^{-1}(\mathrm{pf})$, the delay angle is $\alpha$, the extinction angle is $\beta$ and the conduction angle is $\gamma=\beta-\alpha$.

Question 6: Types of DC Drive, and a Bridge-Fed Separately Excited DC Motor (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Part (a) — Classification of dc drives, and the controlled variables

Classification by input supply. DC drives divide into two families according to what supplies them. The first is the ac-fed, line-commutated converter drive, in which a phase-controlled rectifier converts the ac mains directly to a variable dc armature voltage. Within that family the distinctions that matter are the supply phase count (single-phase for fractional and small integral horsepower, three-phase above roughly 10 kW, because the ripple frequency is six times the line frequency rather than twice and the armature inductance needed is correspondingly smaller); the bridge configuration (a half-controlled bridge is cheaper and gives better input power factor but cannot invert, so it is one-quadrant; a fully-controlled bridge can invert and so gives two-quadrant operation with regenerative braking in one direction); and the number of converters (a dual converter of two fully-controlled bridges in antiparallel gives full four-quadrant operation with reversal of both torque and speed, either with a circulating current or in circulating-current-free mode). The second family is the dc-fed chopper drive, supplied from a battery, a traction third rail, a fuel cell, or a diode-rectified dc link, in which a dc–dc converter provides the variable armature voltage. Choppers are classified by quadrant capability as class A (one quadrant, motoring), class B (regenerative braking), class C (two quadrant), class D and class E (four quadrant). Traction and battery-electric applications are almost exclusively chopper drives; industrial mill and machine-tool drives fed from the mains are converter drives.

Variables to be controlled. A separately excited dc machine obeys $E=k_e\Phi\,n$ and $T=k_t\Phi\,I_a$, with $V_a=E+I_aR_a$, so it presents exactly two independent handles and a drive controls both. Armature voltage is the primary speed control below base speed: raising $V_a$ at constant field raises the back EMF and hence the speed, while the flux stays at rated value so that full torque remains available — this is the constant-torque region. Field current, and hence flux, is the control above base speed: with the armature voltage already at its ceiling, weakening the field raises the speed further, but torque falls in proportion to the flux while the product $T n$ stays roughly constant — the constant-power region. Armature current is controlled in its own right, because it is proportional to torque and because commutation and thermal limits impose a hard ceiling on it; every practical drive therefore uses a cascaded structure with an inner current (torque) loop that enforces the limit and an outer speed loop that commands it, with a position loop outside that in servo applications. In converter drives the manipulated variable that closes these loops is the firing angle of the rectifier; in chopper drives it is the duty ratio.

Parts (b) to (d) — Armature voltage, circuit resistance, output and speed

Given. A three-phase fully controlled bridge supplies the armature of a separately excited dc motor from a 230 V line-to-line source; the armature current is held at 150 A at every operating point, and three firing angles with two known speeds are specified.

Given data
QuantitySymbolValue
Supply voltage (line-to-line, rms)$V_{LL}$230 V
Armature current (constant)$I_a$150 A
Operating point 1$\alpha_1$, $n_1$43°, 1720 rev/min
Operating point 2$\alpha_2$, $n_2$58°, 1000 rev/min
Operating point 3$\alpha_3$65°

Find. The armature voltage at the first operating point; the armature-circuit resistance, output power and torque at the second; and the speed at the third.

3-phase230 V (L-L)60 Hz3-φ full-wavebridge rectifierfiring angle α6 thyristorsVₐIₐ = 150 AMsep. exc.n, TVₐ = (3√2/π) Vₜₕ cos α = 310.61 cos α (V)Armature current held at 150 A at every operating point
Figure 6.1 — The drive: a three-phase fully-controlled bridge feeding the armature of a separately excited dc motor, with the armature current held constant by the current loop.

Approach. Because the armature current is identical at every operating point, the $I_aR_a$ drop is identical too. Differencing two operating points therefore cancels it exactly and isolates the machine constant; a single loop equation then yields the resistance, and the third firing angle needs no new data.

  1. Armature voltage from the bridge. For a three-phase fully-controlled bridge in continuous conduction the mean output is $$V_a=\frac{3\sqrt2}{\pi}V_{LL}\cos\alpha=1.35047\,V_{LL}\cos\alpha =310.61\cos\alpha\ \text{V}.$$ At $\alpha_1=43^\circ$, $$\boxed{V_{a1}=310.61\cos43^\circ=227.17\ \text{V}} .$$ Note the coefficient: $3\sqrt2/\pi$ goes with the line-to-line rms voltage. The alternative form $3\sqrt3/\pi$ goes with the peak phase voltage, and mixing them inflates every answer by 22 per cent.
  2. Armature voltage at the second operating point. $$V_{a2}=310.61\cos58^\circ=164.60\ \text{V}.$$
  3. Eliminate the resistive drop by differencing. At both points $V_a=k_e n+I_aR_a$ with the same $I_aR_a$, so subtracting, $$k_e=\frac{V_{a1}-V_{a2}}{n_1-n_2}=\frac{227.17-164.60}{1720-1000}=\frac{62.57}{720},$$ $$k_e=0.086899\ \text{V per rev/min}\quad(=0.82965\ \text{V}\cdot\text{s/rad}).$$
  4. Armature-circuit resistance from either loop equation. Using the first point, $E_1=k_en_1=149.47$ V, so $$R_a=\frac{V_{a1}-E_1}{I_a}=\frac{227.17-149.47}{150},\qquad \boxed{R_a=0.518\ \Omega} .$$ The second point gives $E_2=86.90$ V and $(164.60-86.90)/150=0.518\ \Omega$ — identical, as it must be.
  5. Output power at 1000 rev/min. The mechanical power developed is the product of the back EMF and the armature current — not the terminal voltage and the current, which would include the copper loss: $$P_{\text{out}}=E_2I_a=86.90\times150=\boxed{13.03\ \text{kW}} .$$
  6. Torque at 1000 rev/min. With $\omega=2\pi n/60=104.72$ rad/s, $$T=\frac{P_{\text{out}}}{\omega}=\frac{13\,035}{104.72}=\boxed{124.5\ \text{N}\cdot\text{m}} .$$ Equivalently $T=k_e'I_a=0.82965\times150=124.4$ N·m using the machine constant in V·s/rad, which is the same statement.
  7. Speed at the third firing angle. The armature voltage falls to $$V_{a3}=310.61\cos65^\circ=131.27\ \text{V},$$ and since the current is unchanged the resistive drop is still $I_aR_a=77.70$ V, so the back EMF is $$E_3=131.27-77.70=53.57\ \text{V}\quad\Rightarrow\quad n_3=\frac{E_3}{k_e}=\frac{53.57}{0.086899},$$ $$\boxed{n_3=616\ \text{rev/min}} .$$
  8. Sanity check on the trend. The three points lie on the same straight line in the $V_a$–$n$ plane, offset from the origin by the constant 77.70 V drop: 227.17 V at 1720 rev/min, 164.60 V at 1000 rev/min, 131.27 V at 616 rev/min. The slope between the first and third points, $(227.17-131.27)/(1720-616.5)=0.0869$, recovers $k_e$ and closes the problem.
43°58°65°01530456075900100200300firing angle α (degrees)armature voltage Vₐ (V)Values are listed in the final-results table
Figure 6.2 — Armature voltage against firing angle for the 230 V bridge, with the three operating points marked. The cosine law is why equal increments of firing angle produce progressively larger speed changes as $\alpha$ increases.

Check: the deduced armature resistance is unusually large for this machine. At $R_a=0.518\ \Omega$ the copper loss is $150^{2}\times0.518=11.65$ kW against a mechanical output of 13.03 kW at 1000 rev/min — an efficiency of only about 53 per cent, which no real armature winding would have. The value nevertheless satisfies both loop equations exactly, so it is what the stated data imply. The physically reasonable reading is that the question says “resistance of the armature circuit”, which permits external series resistance (a starting or current-limiting resistor, or the equivalent resistance of a long feeder) in addition to the winding itself. Reported as given, with the interpretation stated, per the exam's instruction to record any assumptions made.

Final results — Question 6
QuantitySymbolResult
Bridge constant$3\sqrt2/\pi$1.35047
(b) Armature voltage at $\alpha=43^\circ$$V_{a1}$227.17 V
Armature voltage at $\alpha=58^\circ$$V_{a2}$164.60 V
Machine constant$k_e$0.086899 V per rev/min
(c) Armature-circuit resistance$R_a$0.518 Ω
(c) Back EMF at 1000 rev/min$E_2$86.90 V
(c) Output power$P_{\text{out}}$13.03 kW
(c) Developed torque$T$124.5 N·m
(d) Armature voltage at $\alpha=65^\circ$$V_{a3}$131.27 V
(d) Speed$n_3$616 rev/min
Back to the paper →