22-Elec-B8 Power Electronics and Drives · December 2018
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Paper format. National Exams, December 2018 — 16-Elec-B8 Power Electronics and Drives. Three hours, open book, any non-communicating calculator. Six problems of equal value; any five constitute a complete paper. All six are solved here, because the set is a study resource rather than a three-hour sitting.
Reference texts.
Check: how the printed part-lettering is handled. PROBLEM 4 and PROBLEM 6 each open with an unlettered descriptive item and then resume lettering at a-; PROBLEM 4 additionally skips b-, running a-, c-, d-. The solution keeps the exam's own lettering verbatim and answers the unlettered lead item first, so that every printed item is covered and the marks add to 20 per problem.
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
Given. A three-phase, four-pole induction motor with a total leakage inductance of 1.5 mH and negligible resistance runs from a constant volts-per-hertz inverter. Two operating points are specified, and the paper supplies the breakdown-torque approximation to be used.
| Quantity | Symbol | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Poles | $P$ | 4 |
| Total leakage inductance | $L_T$ | 1.5 mH |
| Stator resistance | $R_s$ | negligible |
| Point A: frequency / torque | $f_1$ / $T_{max,1}$ | 60 Hz / 350 N$\cdot$m |
| Point A: quoted speed | $n_1$ | 1800 rpm |
| Point B: frequency / line current | $f_2$ / $I_2$ | 65 Hz / 200 A |
| Torque approximation | $T_{max}$ | $[V_{LL}]^2P/(4\omega_i^2L_T)$ |
Find. Three undesirable effects of high-frequency PWM drives; the line-to-line supply voltage and line current at point A; and the line-to-line voltage and breakdown torque at point B.
Approach. Invert the supplied torque expression for the line voltage at point A; obtain the current from the fact that at breakdown the referred rotor resistance equals the leakage reactance, so the per-phase impedance magnitude is $\sqrt{2}\,\omega L_T$; then run the same two relations in the opposite order at point B.
1. Insulation stress from fast voltage transitions and reflected waves. A modern IGBT inverter switches in tens of nanoseconds, producing $dv/dt$ of several thousand volts per microsecond. On a cable of any appreciable length the motor terminals act as an impedance mismatch, and the incident wave reflects and adds, so the winding can see up to twice the d.c. link voltage on every pulse. The stress falls almost entirely on the first few turns of the first coil, causing partial discharge and premature turn-to-turn failure. Inverter-duty insulation, $dv/dt$ output filters, or terminating networks are the standard countermeasures.
2. Common-mode voltage, shaft voltage and bearing currents. The three inverter pole voltages do not sum to zero instant by instant, so a common-mode voltage appears between the winding neutral and earth. Capacitive coupling across the air gap impresses part of it on the rotor, and when the resulting shaft voltage exceeds the breakdown strength of the bearing lubricant film an electric-discharge-machining current flows through the race. The result is fluting, roughening and early bearing failure. Insulated bearings, shaft grounding rings and common-mode chokes are used to control it.
3. Switching losses and electromagnetic interference. Device losses are proportional to switching frequency, so raising the carrier frequency to reduce audible noise and current ripple directly reduces inverter efficiency and increases the heatsink burden. At the same time the fast edges generate conducted and radiated emissions across a wide spectrum, which interfere with instrumentation, encoder feedback and communications, and drive high-frequency earth-leakage current that can cause nuisance tripping of ground-fault protection.
The quoted rotor speed of 1800 rpm is not needed by either sub-part, but it is worth using as a consistency check: for a four-pole machine at 60 Hz the synchronous speed is $120f/P = 1800$ rpm, so the figure quoted in the question is the synchronous speed of point A rather than the loaded speed at breakdown. At 65 Hz the synchronous speed rises to 1950 rpm.
Check: which voltage goes into which relation. The printed torque expression is written in line-to-line volts, while the per-phase impedance $\sqrt{2}\,\omega L_T$ demands the phase voltage. One sub-part therefore legitimately uses $V_{LL}=273.2$ V for the torque and $V_{ph}=157.7$ V for the current; that is not an inconsistency. The 1.4 per cent drift in volts per hertz between the two points is likewise a genuine feature of the data — a small low-speed voltage boost of the kind real drives apply to offset stator resistance — and not an arithmetic error to be smoothed away.
| Quantity | Symbol | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Synchronous speed at 60 Hz | $n_{s,1}$ | 1800 rpm |
| Supply voltage at point A | $V_{LL,1}$ | 273.2 V |
| Phase voltage at point A | $V_{ph,1}$ | 157.7 V |
| Line current at point A | $I_1$ | 197.2 A |
| Supply voltage at point B | $V_{LL,2}$ | 300.1 V |
| Phase voltage at point B | $V_{ph,2}$ | 173.3 V |
| Breakdown torque at point B | $T_{max,2}$ | 360.0 N$\cdot$m |
| Volts per hertz, A then B | $V_{LL}/f$ | 4.553 then 4.617 V/Hz |