18-Env-A2 Hydrology and Municipal Hydraulics Engineering · May 2016
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
National Exams — May 2016 — 04-Env-A2 / Hydrology and Municipal Hydraulics Engineering. 3 hours duration; closed book with a candidate-prepared 8½×11 in double-sided aid sheet; Casio or Sharp approved calculator only. Any five questions constitute a complete paper (first five answers marked, 20 marks each, 100 marks total); all seven are solved below for completeness.
Reference texts. Davis & Cornwell, Introduction to Environmental Engineering (6th ed.) — hydrology and water-distribution chapters; Metcalf & Eddy, Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery (5th ed.) — sanitary sewer collection systems; MWH’s Water Treatment: Principles and Design (3rd ed.) — pipe-network analysis and pump selection; Chow, Open-Channel Hydraulics — Manning's n tables, specific-energy and sediment-transport theory; Linsley, Hydrology for Engineers — hydrologic cycle, hydrograph analysis and IDF curves; Walski, Advanced Water Distribution Modeling and Management — Hardy-Cross network solutions and pump affinity laws.
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
Given.
| Pipe | Length, $L$ | Diameter, $d$ |
|---|---|---|
| AB | 600 m | 300 mm |
| BC | 700 m | 350 mm |
| CD | 600 m | 400 mm |
| AC | 400 m | 350 mm |
| BD | 400 m | 450 mm |
Node demands: inflow 1000 L/s at A; outflows 100 L/s at B, 300 L/s at C, 600 L/s at D (a self-consistent network — total demand equals total inflow).
Find. The converged flow in each of the five pipes.
Approach. Assume a trial flow distribution that satisfies continuity at every node, split the network into two independent loops sharing pipe BC, compute the Hazen–Williams head loss $h_L=KQ^{1.852}$ for each pipe, and apply the Hardy-Cross correction $\Delta Q=-\sum h_L/(1.852\sum h_L/Q)$ loop-by-loop until $\sum h_L\to0$ around both loops simultaneously.
| Pipe | Converged flow, $Q$ | Velocity, $V$ | Head loss, $h_L$ |
|---|---|---|---|
| AB | 354.4 L/s (A→B) | 5.01 m/s | 65.27 m |
| AC | 645.6 L/s (A→C) | 6.71 m/s | 62.35 m |
| BC | 91.4 L/s (C→B) | 0.95 m/s | 2.92 m |
| BD | 345.8 L/s (B→D) | 2.17 m/s | 5.77 m |
| CD | 254.2 L/s (C→D) | 2.02 m/s | 8.69 m |
Gravity sewer. Condition: adequate natural ground slope/relief along the alignment to maintain the self-cleansing velocity (typically ≥0.6 m/s) under gravity alone. Advantage: lowest operating and maintenance cost — no mechanical or electrical components in the collection pipe itself, making it the simplest and most reliable long-term option.
Pressure sewer (grinder-pump, low-pressure system). Condition: flat or undulating terrain, or shallow rock, where deep gravity trenching is impractical or uneconomical. Advantage: the pipe can follow the ground surface at shallow, near-uniform depth and cross ridges or high points a gravity line cannot, substantially reducing excavation cost in difficult terrain.
Vacuum sewer. Condition: flat terrain with a high water table (e.g., coastal or low-lying areas) where gravity trenching would require continuous dewatering. Advantage: very shallow, flat-grade installation with a fully sealed, negative-pressure pipe network, which reduces infiltration/exfiltration and environmental risk in sensitive, high-groundwater areas.
Given. $Q=\frac{1}{n}AR^{2/3}S^{1/2}$, the standard empirical resistance equation for steady, uniform (normal-depth) turbulent flow in an open channel or a partially/fully-flowing pipe.
Find. The meaning and consistent dimensions of $Q$, $A$, $n$, $R$ and $S$.
$Q$ is the discharge [m³/s]; $A$ is the flow cross-sectional area [m²]; $n$ is Manning's roughness coefficient, an empirical, dimensionless-in-practice friction parameter (its formal SI unit is s/m$^{1/3}$, but it is conventionally quoted as a bare number, e.g. 0.013 for smooth concrete); $R=A/P$ is the hydraulic radius (flow area divided by wetted perimeter $P$) [m]; and $S$ is the energy grade-line slope (equal to the bed slope for uniform flow) [m/m, dimensionless]. The formula works because, for fully turbulent flow, wall shear stress scales with $R^{1/3}$ times the mean-velocity gradient in a way Manning's empirical exponents capture without needing an explicit friction-factor iteration.