NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

18-Env-A3 Geotechnical and Hydrogeological Engineering · May 2016

Question 3 of 6: Seepage & Uplift Beneath a Concrete Gravity Dam

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams — May 2016 — 04-Env-A3 / Geotechnical & Hydrogeological Engineering. 3 hours duration; open book exam, any non-communicating calculator permitted. FIVE (5) questions constitute a complete exam paper (the first five as they appear in the answer book are marked, 20 marks each, 100 marks total); all six printed questions are solved below for completeness.

Reference texts. Braja M. Das, Principles of Geotechnical Engineering (9th ed.) — weight–volume relations, USCS classification, seepage/flow nets, consolidation and bearing-capacity chapters; Craig & Knappett, Craig's Soil Mechanics (8th ed.) — cross-reference for seepage and flow-net theory; Freeze & Cherry, Groundwater (1979) — Darcy's law, the Dupuit–Thiem equation for an unconfined well, and wellhead time-of-travel capture zones.

Question 3: Seepage & Uplift Beneath a Concrete Gravity Dam (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given.

Given data
QuantitySymbolValue
Sandy soil (seepage layer) thickness$a$40 m
Sandy soil porosity$n$5%
Saturated hydraulic conductivity$k$10 m/day
Dam base length (seepage path)$B$40 m
Dam crest length (out of plane)$L$20 m
Headwater above grade—12 m
Tailwater—at grade (0 m)
Sandy soil (a = 40 m, k = 10 m/day, n = 5%)Impervious rockDamReservoir, headwater +12 m12 mTailwater at grade (0 m)B = 40 mu = 117.7 kPau = 0Uplift pressure distribution (linear, base of dam)Figure 2 — dam cross-section, seepage path, and base uplift-pressure distribution
Figure 2 — the dam sits directly on the sandy soil's top surface with no cutoff; the reservoir floods the surface right up to the upstream toe (headwater 12 m above grade) and the tailwater sits at grade at the downstream toe, so the dam's own base is the only "impervious floor" forcing horizontal flow beneath it.

Find. (a) seepage volume beneath the dam, m³/day; (b) the uplift pressure distribution along the dam base and whether it is a concern.

Approach. With a flat, uniform-thickness pervious layer and the headwater/tailwater both flooding its surface directly at the dam's toes (no unflooded gap), the flow net for this cross-section reduces to the single-fragment case: horizontal, one-dimensional Darcy flow under the dam's own base, over the full layer thickness. The same linear head loss along the base gives the uplift-pressure distribution directly.

  1. Part (a) — seepage rate. The total head drop across the seepage path is the headwater elevation above grade minus the tailwater elevation (also relative to grade): $\Delta H=12-0=12$ m. Applying Darcy's law across the dam footprint (thickness $a$, path length $B$), $$q=\frac{k\,a\,\Delta H}{B}=\frac{10\times40\times12}{40}=\boxed{120\ \text{m}^3/\text{day per m}}.$$ Multiplying by the dam's crest length $L=20$ m, $$Q=q\,L=120\times20=\boxed{2400\ \text{m}^3/\text{day}}.$$
  2. Part (b) — total head along the base. Because the flow is essentially horizontal under a flat base, the total head falls off LINEARLY from the upstream toe ($x=0$, $h=\Delta H=12$ m) to the downstream toe ($x=B=40$ m, $h=0$): $$h(x)=12-\frac{12}{40}x=12-0.3x\ \ \text{(m, measured above the tailwater datum)}.$$ Since the dam base is flat (elevation head constant along it), the pressure head equals the total head at every point, so the uplift pressure is $$u(x)=\gamma_w\,h(x)=9.81\,(12-0.3x)\ \text{kPa}.$$ At the heel ($x=0$): $u=9.81\times12=\boxed{117.7\ \text{kPa}}$. At the toe ($x=40$ m): $u=\boxed{0}$ — a straight-line (triangular) distribution between the two.
  3. Total uplift force and comment. Integrating the triangular distribution over the base and the dam's crest length, $$U=\tfrac12\,u_{\max}\,B\,L=\tfrac12\times117.7\times40\times20=\boxed{47{,}088\ \text{kN}\approx47.1\ \text{MN}}.$$ This is a substantial uplift force acting over the full 40 m × 20 m base — it reduces the effective normal stress (and hence the frictional sliding resistance) along the base by up to 117.7 kPa at the heel, tapering to none at the toe. Because the uplift is largest exactly where the driving reservoir thrust is also largest (near the heel), it works directly against both the sliding and the overturning factors of safety; without further reduction, a dam of this footprint and seepage path should be checked against sliding/overturning WITH this uplift included, and if the margin is tight, mitigation (a cutoff wall or grout curtain near the heel, and/or a toe drainage/relief-well system to reduce the pressure before it reaches the base) is the standard remedy.
Check: the reservoir/tailwater elevations relative to grade, and the dam base length B = 40 m, are read directly off the figure's own dimension lines; the figure separately marks two "2 m" depths (upstream, beside the reservoir label, and downstream, beside the tailwater symbol) that on inspection are below-grade filter/bedding annotations distinct from the actual pond elevations (the tailwater's own water-table symbol sits AT grade) — they confirm a boundary condition rather than feed the calculation, so they are not used above. No dam self-weight/geometry is given, so the overturning/sliding check in part (b) is qualitative only.
QuantityValue
Head loss across the base, $\Delta H$12 m
(a) Seepage, $Q$2400 m³/day
Uplift pressure, heel → toe117.7 kPa → 0 kPa (linear)
(b) Total uplift force, $U$47,088 kN (≈47.1 MN)