18-Env-A3 Geotechnical and Hydrogeological Engineering · May 2016
Question 5 of 6: Preload Consolidation of a Saturated Clay Layer
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exams — May 2016 — 04-Env-A3 / Geotechnical & Hydrogeological Engineering. 3 hours duration; open book exam, any non-communicating calculator permitted. FIVE (5) questions constitute a complete exam paper (the first five as they appear in the answer book are marked, 20 marks each, 100 marks total); all six printed questions are solved below for completeness.
Reference texts. Braja M. Das, Principles of Geotechnical Engineering (9th ed.) — weight–volume relations, USCS classification, seepage/flow nets, consolidation and bearing-capacity chapters; Craig & Knappett, Craig's Soil Mechanics (8th ed.) — cross-reference for seepage and flow-net theory; Freeze & Cherry, Groundwater (1979) — Darcy's law, the Dupuit–Thiem equation for an unconfined well, and wellhead time-of-travel capture zones.
Question 5: Preload Consolidation of a Saturated Clay Layer (20 marks)
Figure 5 — soil profile: the fill is placed directly on the clay's original ground surface, and impermeable shale beneath the clay means the layer drains in ONE direction only (upward, into the fill).
Find. (a) ultimate primary settlement $S_c$; (b) time $t_{90}$ for 90% of primary consolidation.
Approach. Compute the effective stress at the clay's mid-depth before and after the fill is placed (the fill is dry, so its full weight is effective stress; the clay was already saturated and unloaded before the fill), then apply the normally-consolidated settlement formula. For part (b), the impermeable rock base means single drainage, so the drainage path equals the full clay thickness.
Part (a) — unit weights. The dry fill has void ratio $e_{fill}=n_{fill}/(1-n_{fill})=0.10/0.90=0.1111$, so
$$\gamma_{d,fill}=\frac{G_{s,fill}\gamma_w}{1+e_{fill}}=\frac{2.65\times9.81}{1.1111}=\boxed{23.40\ \text{kN/m}^3}.$$
The saturated clay's unit weight, and its buoyant (submerged) unit weight, are
$$\begin{aligned} \gamma_{sat,clay}&=\frac{(G_{s,clay}+e_0)\gamma_w}{1+e_0}=\frac{(2.452+3.2)\times9.81}{4.2}=13.20\ \text{kN/m}^3, \\ \gamma_b'&=13.20-9.81=\boxed{3.39\ \text{kN/m}^3}. \end{aligned}$$
Effective stress at clay mid-depth, before and after the fill. Before the fill, the clay's own top surface was the (submerged, since it is stated to be fully saturated) ground surface, so at mid-depth ($z=H/2=2.5$ m into the clay),
$$\sigma_0'=\gamma_b'\,z=3.39\times2.5=\boxed{8.48\ \text{kPa}}.$$
The 10 m of DRY fill sits entirely above the water table, so its full weight adds directly to the effective stress (no buoyancy reduction):
$$\Delta\sigma'=\gamma_{d,fill}\,H_{fill}=23.40\times10=\boxed{234.0\ \text{kPa}}.$$
$$\sigma_1'=\sigma_0'+\Delta\sigma'=8.48+234.0=\boxed{242.5\ \text{kPa}}.$$
Apply the normally-consolidated settlement formula.
$$\begin{aligned} S_c&=\frac{C_c H}{1+e_0}\log_{10}\!\left(\frac{\sigma_1'}{\sigma_0'}\right)=\frac{0.551\times5}{1+3.2}\log_{10}\!\left(\frac{242.5}{8.48}\right) \\ &=0.656\times1.457=\boxed{0.956\ \text{m}\ (\approx956\ \text{mm})}. \end{aligned}$$
Nearly a metre of settlement out of a 5 m clay layer is large but consistent with the data: the clay starts almost unloaded ($e_0=3.2$ is a very soft, high-void-ratio clay) and the stress ratio $\sigma_1'/\sigma_0'\approx29$ is huge — exactly the kind of large, rapid settlement a preload fill is designed to force to completion before construction, rather than let happen slowly under a permanent structure.
Part (b) — time for 90% consolidation. Impermeable rock underlies the clay, so drainage is SINGLE (upward only, into the permeable fill) and the drainage path equals the full layer thickness: $H_{dr}=H=5\ \text{m}=500$ cm. Using the standard time factor for $U=90\%$, $T_{v,90}=0.848$,
$$t_{90}=\frac{T_{v,90}\,H_{dr}^2}{C_v}=\frac{0.848\times500^2}{0.002}=1.06\times10^{8}\ \text{s}=\boxed{3.36\ \text{years}}.$$
Check: single drainage (Hdr = full 5 m clay thickness) follows from the impermeable shale base shown in the figure — if the underlying rock were instead permeable this would be double drainage and t90 would be four times smaller. The recompression index Cr is not used: the clay is stated to be normally consolidated, so its entire stress path from sigma0' to sigma1' lies on the virgin compression line (no over-consolidated recompression segment to account for).