18-Env-A3 Geotechnical and Hydrogeological Engineering · May 2017
Question 4 of 6: Consolidation of a Clay Layer Under a Gravel Fill
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exams — May 2017 — 04-Env-A3 / Geotechnical & Hydrogeological Engineering. 3 hours duration; open book exam, any non-communicating calculator permitted. FIVE (5) questions constitute a complete exam paper (the first five as they appear in the answer book are marked, 20 marks each, 100 marks total); all six printed questions are solved below for completeness.
Reference texts. Braja M. Das, Principles of Geotechnical Engineering (9th ed.) — weight–volume relations, seepage/flow nets, grain-size analysis, consolidation and slope-stability chapters; Craig & Knappett, Craig's Soil Mechanics (8th ed.) — cross-reference for flow-net theory and the Method of Fragments; Freeze & Cherry, Groundwater (1979) — Darcy's law and the Dupuit–Thiem equation for radial flow to a well.
Question 4: Consolidation of a Clay Layer Under a Gravel Fill (20 marks)
Find. (a) $\sigma_0'(z)$ within the clay immediately after fill placement; (b) ultimate primary consolidation settlement.
Approach. Find the clay's saturated/buoyant unit weight from $e_0$ and $G_s$, recognise that "immediately after" placement means the added stress is carried entirely by excess pore pressure (effective stress unchanged), then use the single-point (mid-depth) method with the OC/NC split to get the ultimate settlement.
Fig. Q4 — 20 m clay layer on impermeable bedrock, topped by a proposed 20 m gravel fill.
Clay unit weight. Fully saturated, so
$$\gamma_{sat}=\frac{G_s+e_0}{1+e_0}\gamma_w=\frac{2.5+0.5}{1.5}\times9.81=\boxed{19.62\ \text{kN/m}^3},\qquad \gamma'=\gamma_{sat}-\gamma_w=9.81\ \text{kN/m}^3.$$
Part (a) — effective stress profile "immediately after" placement. Under Terzaghi 1-D consolidation theory, a newly-applied load is carried entirely by excess pore pressure at $t=0^+$ ($\Delta u=\Delta\sigma$), so the EFFECTIVE stress profile is unchanged from the pre-fill overburden condition, $\sigma_0'(z)=\gamma' z$:
$$\sigma_0'(0)=0,\ \ \sigma_0'(5)=49.05,\ \ \sigma_0'(10)=98.10,\ \ \sigma_0'(15)=147.15,\ \ \boxed{\sigma_0'(20)=196.20\ \text{kPa}}.$$
Meanwhile the total stress increase from the fill, $\Delta\sigma=\gamma_{fill}\times t_{fill}=20\times20=400$ kPa, appears entirely as excess pore pressure $\Delta u=400$ kPa immediately after placement — this is the point of the "immediately after" wording.
Fig. Q4b — effective overburden stress profile within the clay, immediately after fill placement (unchanged from pre-fill).
Part (b) — ultimate settlement, single-point (mid-depth) method. At $z=H/2=10$ m: $\sigma_0'=\gamma'\times10=98.10$ kPa, just below $\sigma_p'=100$ kPa — the clay is lightly overconsolidated at mid-depth, and the final stress $\sigma_0'+\Delta\sigma=98.10+400=498.10$ kPa crosses well past $\sigma_p'$, so the settlement has both a recompression (OC) and virgin-compression (NC) branch:
$$S_c=\frac{H}{1+e_0}\left[C_r\log_{10}\frac{\sigma_p'}{\sigma_0'}+C_c\log_{10}\frac{\sigma_0'+\Delta\sigma}{\sigma_p'}\right]$$
$$=\frac{20}{1.5}\left[0.05\log_{10}\frac{100}{98.10}+0.35\log_{10}\frac{498.10}{100}\right]=13.33\times[0.000417+0.24406]=\boxed{3.26\ \text{m}}\ (3260\ \text{mm}).$$
Check: the OC-branch term (0.000417) is negligible next to the NC-branch term (0.244) because $\sigma_0'$ sits barely 2% below $\sigma_p'$ — essentially the whole 400 kPa load drives virgin (normally-consolidated) compression, which is why the settlement is so large (3.26 m out of a 20 m layer, ≈16% strain) for such a heavy fill.