NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

18-Env-A3 Geotechnical and Hydrogeological Engineering · May 2017

Question 4 of 6: Consolidation of a Clay Layer Under a Gravel Fill

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams — May 2017 — 04-Env-A3 / Geotechnical & Hydrogeological Engineering. 3 hours duration; open book exam, any non-communicating calculator permitted. FIVE (5) questions constitute a complete exam paper (the first five as they appear in the answer book are marked, 20 marks each, 100 marks total); all six printed questions are solved below for completeness.

Reference texts. Braja M. Das, Principles of Geotechnical Engineering (9th ed.) — weight–volume relations, seepage/flow nets, grain-size analysis, consolidation and slope-stability chapters; Craig & Knappett, Craig's Soil Mechanics (8th ed.) — cross-reference for flow-net theory and the Method of Fragments; Freeze & Cherry, Groundwater (1979) — Darcy's law and the Dupuit–Thiem equation for radial flow to a well.

Question 4: Consolidation of a Clay Layer Under a Gravel Fill (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given.

Given data
QuantitySymbolValue
Clay thickness$H$20 m
Clay void ratio$e_0$0.5
Specific gravity$G_s$2.5
Compression / recompression index$C_c$ / $C_r$0.35 / 0.05
Preconsolidation pressure$\sigma_p'$100 kPa
Fill thickness & unit weight—20 m, $\gamma_{fill}=20$ kN/m³

Find. (a) $\sigma_0'(z)$ within the clay immediately after fill placement; (b) ultimate primary consolidation settlement.

Approach. Find the clay's saturated/buoyant unit weight from $e_0$ and $G_s$, recognise that "immediately after" placement means the added stress is carried entirely by excess pore pressure (effective stress unchanged), then use the single-point (mid-depth) method with the OC/NC split to get the ultimate settlement.

Proposed Fill (20 m, γ=20 kN/m³) Clay, H = 20 m e₀=0.5, Gₛ=2.5, Cₜ=0.35, Cₛ=0.05 impermeable Δσ (fill load) H
Fig. Q4 — 20 m clay layer on impermeable bedrock, topped by a proposed 20 m gravel fill.
  1. Clay unit weight. Fully saturated, so $$\gamma_{sat}=\frac{G_s+e_0}{1+e_0}\gamma_w=\frac{2.5+0.5}{1.5}\times9.81=\boxed{19.62\ \text{kN/m}^3},\qquad \gamma'=\gamma_{sat}-\gamma_w=9.81\ \text{kN/m}^3.$$
  2. Part (a) — effective stress profile "immediately after" placement. Under Terzaghi 1-D consolidation theory, a newly-applied load is carried entirely by excess pore pressure at $t=0^+$ ($\Delta u=\Delta\sigma$), so the EFFECTIVE stress profile is unchanged from the pre-fill overburden condition, $\sigma_0'(z)=\gamma' z$: $$\sigma_0'(0)=0,\ \ \sigma_0'(5)=49.05,\ \ \sigma_0'(10)=98.10,\ \ \sigma_0'(15)=147.15,\ \ \boxed{\sigma_0'(20)=196.20\ \text{kPa}}.$$ Meanwhile the total stress increase from the fill, $\Delta\sigma=\gamma_{fill}\times t_{fill}=20\times20=400$ kPa, appears entirely as excess pore pressure $\Delta u=400$ kPa immediately after placement — this is the point of the "immediately after" wording.
0 50 100 150 200 0 5 10 15 20 σ′₀ (kPa) depth z (m)
Fig. Q4b — effective overburden stress profile within the clay, immediately after fill placement (unchanged from pre-fill).
  1. Part (b) — ultimate settlement, single-point (mid-depth) method. At $z=H/2=10$ m: $\sigma_0'=\gamma'\times10=98.10$ kPa, just below $\sigma_p'=100$ kPa — the clay is lightly overconsolidated at mid-depth, and the final stress $\sigma_0'+\Delta\sigma=98.10+400=498.10$ kPa crosses well past $\sigma_p'$, so the settlement has both a recompression (OC) and virgin-compression (NC) branch: $$S_c=\frac{H}{1+e_0}\left[C_r\log_{10}\frac{\sigma_p'}{\sigma_0'}+C_c\log_{10}\frac{\sigma_0'+\Delta\sigma}{\sigma_p'}\right]$$ $$=\frac{20}{1.5}\left[0.05\log_{10}\frac{100}{98.10}+0.35\log_{10}\frac{498.10}{100}\right]=13.33\times[0.000417+0.24406]=\boxed{3.26\ \text{m}}\ (3260\ \text{mm}).$$
Check: the OC-branch term (0.000417) is negligible next to the NC-branch term (0.244) because $\sigma_0'$ sits barely 2% below $\sigma_p'$ — essentially the whole 400 kPa load drives virgin (normally-consolidated) compression, which is why the settlement is so large (3.26 m out of a 20 m layer, ≈16% strain) for such a heavy fill.
QuantityValue
$\gamma_{sat}$ (clay)19.62 kN/m³
$\sigma_0'$ at $z=20$ m (base)196.2 kPa
$\Delta u$ immediately after placement400 kPa (=$\Delta\sigma$)
$\sigma_0'$ at mid-depth ($z=10$ m)98.10 kPa
Ultimate settlement, $S_c$3.26 m (3260 mm)