18-Env-A3 Geotechnical and Hydrogeological Engineering · May 2017
Question 5 of 6: Well Hydraulics in an Unconfined Aquifer
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exams — May 2017 — 04-Env-A3 / Geotechnical & Hydrogeological Engineering. 3 hours duration; open book exam, any non-communicating calculator permitted. FIVE (5) questions constitute a complete exam paper (the first five as they appear in the answer book are marked, 20 marks each, 100 marks total); all six printed questions are solved below for completeness.
Reference texts. Braja M. Das, Principles of Geotechnical Engineering (9th ed.) — weight–volume relations, seepage/flow nets, grain-size analysis, consolidation and slope-stability chapters; Craig & Knappett, Craig's Soil Mechanics (8th ed.) — cross-reference for flow-net theory and the Method of Fragments; Freeze & Cherry, Groundwater (1979) — Darcy's law and the Dupuit–Thiem equation for radial flow to a well.
Question 5: Well Hydraulics in an Unconfined Aquifer (20 marks)
Find. (a) drawdown $s_1$, $s_2$ at $r_1=50$ m and $r_2=500$ m; (b) travel time for a conservative tracer between $r_1$ and $r_2$.
Approach. Use the Thiem/Dupuit equation for steady unconfined radial flow between each observation point and the known boundary condition at $R$, then integrate the radial seepage (interstitial) velocity from the Thiem head field to get travel time.
Part (a) — drawdown via the unconfined Thiem equation. Between the boundary ($h=H$ at $r=R$) and any point $r$:
$$h(r)=\sqrt{H^2-\frac{Q}{\pi k}\ln\frac{R}{r}}\ ,\qquad s(r)=H-h(r).$$
$$h(50)=\sqrt{36-\frac{500}{\pi(1728)}\ln\frac{2000}{50}}=\sqrt{36-0.3397}=5.9716\ \text{m}\ \Rightarrow\ \boxed{s_1=2.84\ \text{cm}}.$$
$$h(500)=\sqrt{36-\frac{500}{\pi(1728)}\ln\frac{2000}{500}}=\sqrt{36-0.1277}=5.9894\ \text{m}\ \Rightarrow\ \boxed{s_2=1.07\ \text{cm}}.$$
Part (b) — travel time. The radial seepage (interstitial) velocity at distance $r$ is $v(r)=\dfrac{Q}{2\pi r\,h(r)\,n_e}$, so the travel time between $r_1$ and $r_2$ is
$$t=\int_{r_1}^{r_2}\frac{2\pi n_e\,r\,h(r)}{Q}\,dr.$$
Because the drawdown is tiny across this range ($h\approx H=6$ m throughout, varying by <0.03 m), this integrates essentially in closed form as
$$t\approx\frac{\pi n_e H\left(r_2^2-r_1^2\right)}{Q}=\frac{\pi(0.30)(6)(500^2-50^2)}{500}=\boxed{2792\ \text{days}\ (7.65\ \text{yr})},$$
confirmed to within 0.3% by numerically integrating with the exact (non-constant) $h(r)$.
Check: the exam gives no effective porosity for the aquifer sand, so $n_e=0.30$ is assumed here (typical for a uniform, isotropic clean sand, per Freeze & Cherry Table 2.4). Travel time scales linearly with $n_e$ — e.g. a looser $n_e=0.35$ sand would give ≈3257 days instead.
Fig. Q5 — unconfined well with drawdown curve (vertically exaggerated for visibility — true drawdown is a few centimetres).