NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

18-Env-A4 Water and Wastewater Engineering · May 2017

Question 3 of 5: pH Significance and Alkalinity from a Double Titration

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams — May 2017 — 04-Env-A4 / Water and Wastewater Engineering. 3 hours duration; closed book with one double-sided aid sheet; approved calculator permitted. Question 1 is compulsory; the paper instructs candidates to attempt any three of the remaining four questions — all five are solved below for completeness.

Reference texts. Metcalf & Eddy, Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery (5th ed.) — oxygen sag/Streeter-Phelps, MLSS/MLVSS, population equivalent, primary clarifier design; Davis & Cornwell, Introduction to Environmental Engineering (6th ed.) — turbidity, alkalinity chemistry; MWH’s Water Treatment: Principles and Design (3rd ed.) — coagulation-flocculation, softening, disinfection by-products, pH; Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality (Health Canada).

Question 3: pH Significance and Alkalinity from a Double Titration (25 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

(i) pH: Definition and Significance

pH is the negative base-10 logarithm of the hydrogen-ion activity, $pH = -\log_{10}[H^+]$, giving a 0–14 scale on which 7 is neutral (pure water at 25 °C), values below 7 acidic and above 7 alkaline. In water treatment pH governs two process-critical equilibria addressed directly by this exam.

Disinfection. Free chlorine in water exists as an equilibrium between hypochlorous acid (HOCl) and the hypochlorite ion (OCl−), $HOCl \rightleftharpoons H^+ + OCl^-$, with a pKa near 7.5. HOCl, the dominant species below pH ≈7.5, is roughly 80–100 times more effective a biocide than OCl− because its neutral charge lets it penetrate microbial cell walls far more readily. Raising pH shifts the equilibrium toward the far weaker OCl−, so a plant must either hold pH low during chlorine contact or dose substantially more chlorine (and provide longer contact time, i.e. a larger CT) to achieve the same log-inactivation at higher pH.

Coagulation-flocculation. Hydrolyzing metal coagulants (alum, ferric chloride) only form the insoluble, positively-charged hydroxide precipitates responsible for charge neutralization and sweep-floc capture within a narrow optimum pH band — roughly 5.5–7.5 for alum, a wider 4–11 for ferric salts. Outside that window the metal hydroxide either fails to precipitate (stays soluble, no floc forms) or, at high pH, redissolves as an anionic aluminate/ferrate, so pH control (often with lime, soda ash, or CO2) directly ahead of rapid mix is essential to reliable turbidity removal.

(ii) Alkalinity from the Double Titration

Given.

Double (phenolphthalein / Bromocresol Green) titration
QuantitySymbolValue
Sample volume$V_s$50 mL
Titrant normality$N$0.02 N H2SO4
Volume to phenolphthalein end point (pH 8.3)$V_P$5 mL
Volume to Bromocresol Green end point (pH 4.5, cumulative)$V_T$8 mL

Find. The alkalinity indicated by each end point, its numerical value, and any further alkalinity species (hydroxide/carbonate/bicarbonate) recoverable from the two readings.

Approach. Convert each titrant volume to an alkalinity as mg/L CaCO3, then apply the standard phenolphthalein/total alkalinity relationships (Sawyer & McCarty) to split the total into its hydroxide, carbonate and bicarbonate components.

  1. Name the two end points. The phenolphthalein end point (pH 8.3) measures phenolphthalein alkalinity, $P$ — the alkalinity neutralized down to the point where all hydroxide and half of any carbonate has been converted. The Bromocresol Green end point (pH 4.5) measures total alkalinity, $T$ — all hydroxide, carbonate and bicarbonate alkalinity present, since 4.5 is the carbonic-acid/bicarbonate equivalence point.
  2. Convert titrant volumes to alkalinity. $Alkalinity\,(\text{mg/L as }CaCO_3) = \dfrac{V_{acid}(\text{mL}) \times N(\text{eq/L}) \times 50{,}000}{V_s(\text{mL})}$. For $P$: $\dfrac{5 \times 0.02 \times 50{,}000}{50} = \boxed{100 \text{ mg/L as } CaCO_3}$. For $T$: $\dfrac{8 \times 0.02 \times 50{,}000}{50} = \boxed{160 \text{ mg/L as } CaCO_3}$.
  3. Identify the governing case. Comparing $P$ to $T/2 = 80$: since $P = 100 > T/2$, the sample’s alkalinity is composed of hydroxide and carbonate only — no bicarbonate is present (Sawyer & McCarty table, case $P > T/2$).
  4. Compute the third (other) alkalinity values. Hydroxide: $OH^- = 2P - T = 2(100) - 160 = \boxed{40 \text{ mg/L as } CaCO_3}$. Carbonate: $CO_3^{2-} = 2(T-P) = 2(160-100) = \boxed{120 \text{ mg/L as } CaCO_3}$. Bicarbonate: $HCO_3^- = 0$. Check: $40 + 120 + 0 = 160 = T$, reconstituting the measured total exactly.
Question 3 — final results
QuantityValue
Phenolphthalein alkalinity, $P$100 mg/L as CaCO3
Total alkalinity, $T$160 mg/L as CaCO3
Hydroxide alkalinity, $OH^-$40 mg/L as CaCO3
Carbonate alkalinity, $CO_3^{2-}$120 mg/L as CaCO3
Bicarbonate alkalinity, $HCO_3^-$0 mg/L as CaCO3