18-Env-A6 Solid Waste Engineering and Management · May 2013
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Reference texts: Tchobanoglous, Theisen & Vigil, Integrated Solid Waste Management: Engineering Principles and Management Issues; Vesilind, Worrell & Reinhart, Solid Waste Engineering; Davis & Cornwell, Introduction to Environmental Engineering (6th ed.); CCME, Guidance Document on Landfill Gas Management.
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
A life-cycle analysis (LCA) of a composting solution follows the standard ISO 14040 four-stage framework, applied specifically to the composting system:
1. Goal and scope definition. State the purpose (compare composting against the city's other options — landfilling, incineration) and define the system boundary: collection of organics, transport to the composting facility, processing (windrow/in-vessel), curing, and end use/distribution of the finished compost. Define the functional unit (e.g., "management of 1 tonne of source-separated organics").
2. Life-cycle inventory (LCI). Quantify every input and output crossing the system boundary: fuel and electricity for collection vehicles and turning/aeration equipment, water added during processing, land area occupied, and outputs including finished compost mass, fugitive emissions (CH₄, N₂O, VOCs, odour), leachate/runoff from the pad, and residuals (contraries) sent to landfill.
3. Life-cycle impact assessment (LCIA). Translate the inventory into impact categories — global warming potential (CH₄/N₂O emissions vs. the avoided landfill methane and avoided synthetic fertilizer manufacture), energy consumption, water use, and local air/odour and water-quality effects — using standard characterization factors.
4. Interpretation and comparison. Compare the composting option's impact profile against the alternatives (landfilling with gas capture, incineration with energy recovery) on a consistent functional-unit basis, identify the dominant contributors (e.g., transport distance, energy for turning, avoided-fertilizer credit), test sensitivity to key assumptions, and use the results to recommend whether — and at what scale — composting should be part of the city's integrated plan, along with any design changes (e.g., closer siting, in-vessel vs. windrow) that would most improve its performance.