NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

18-Env-B5 Industrial & Hazardous Waste Management · December 2014

Question 14 of 20: Strategies to Reduce Industrial Liquid Waste Strength

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Reference texts: Nemerow & Dasgupta, Industrial and Hazardous Waste Treatment, 2nd ed.; Metcalf & Eddy, Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery, 5th ed.; Davis & Cornwell, Introduction to Environmental Engineering, 6th ed.; LaGrega, Buckingham & Evans, Hazardous Waste Management, 2nd ed.; CCME, Guidelines for the Management of Biomedical Waste in Canada (1992); Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA), 1999; provincial Environmental Protection / Hazardous Waste Regulations (e.g. BC's Hazardous Waste Regulation, O.Reg. 347 in Ontario); Montgomery & Runger, Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers (for Q1–Q5's basic-statistics content).

Question 14: Strategies to Reduce Industrial Liquid Waste Strength (5 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Five recognized strategies to reduce industrial liquid-waste strength (organic loading, BOD/COD) are: (1) process modification/source reduction — changing a manufacturing process, chemical, or raw material so that less waste-generating material is used or lost in the first place, which is the single most effective strategy because it prevents the waste rather than treating it after the fact. (2) water/material reuse and recycling within the process (e.g. counter-current rinse staging, recovering and recycling process water) reduces both the volume and, indirectly, the total mass of contaminant discharged. (3) segregation of high-strength streams from low-strength or non-contact streams, so the concentrated stream can be treated or recovered efficiently (or even sold/reused as a by-product) rather than diluted into, and forced to be treated as, the entire combined waste volume. (4) in-plant recovery of valuable by-products (e.g. recovering a solvent, oil, or raw material that would otherwise be lost to the drain), which reduces waste strength while also offsetting cost. (5) housekeeping and spill-prevention practices (dry clean-up before wash-down, preventive maintenance to avoid leaks and overflows, employee training) — a large fraction of avoidable waste strength in many plants comes from spills and inefficient housekeeping rather than the core process itself. Strategies 1–4 typically require capital investment and process-engineering study to identify and implement, whereas strategy 5 is comparatively low-cost and can often be started immediately, which is why an experienced consultant usually recommends a housekeeping audit as the very first step of any waste-reduction assignment, even while the larger process-modification study is still underway.