18-Env-B5 Industrial & Hazardous Waste Management · December 2014
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Reference texts: Nemerow & Dasgupta, Industrial and Hazardous Waste Treatment, 2nd ed.; Metcalf & Eddy, Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery, 5th ed.; Davis & Cornwell, Introduction to Environmental Engineering, 6th ed.; LaGrega, Buckingham & Evans, Hazardous Waste Management, 2nd ed.; CCME, Guidelines for the Management of Biomedical Waste in Canada (1992); Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA), 1999; provincial Environmental Protection / Hazardous Waste Regulations (e.g. BC's Hazardous Waste Regulation, O.Reg. 347 in Ontario); Montgomery & Runger, Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers (for Q1–Q5's basic-statistics content).
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
Biomedical waste management follows the standard hierarchy of segregation at source, containment, treatment/disinfection, and disposal — but the specific containment and treatment method depends heavily on whether the waste is solid or liquid. Solid biomedical waste (sharps, contaminated dressings, disposable labware, anatomical waste) is segregated into colour-coded, leak-proof and (for sharps) puncture-resistant containers at the point of generation, then treated by autoclaving (steam sterilization), chemical disinfection, or high-temperature incineration (mandatory for anatomical and pathological waste) before landfill disposal or, for recyclable sharps containers, return to a licensed processor. Liquid biomedical waste (blood, body fluids, laboratory liquid cultures, used disinfectants) cannot simply be autoclaved as a bulk stream in the same way — it is typically chemically disinfected in place (e.g. with a hypochlorite or other approved disinfectant, holding for a validated contact time) before discharge to the sanitary sewer under a sewer-use permit, or, where discharge is not permitted (e.g. chemotherapy or cytotoxic liquid waste), collected separately for off-site treatment/incineration. The key management distinction is that solid waste is managed as discrete, containable units that can be physically segregated and tracked, whereas liquid waste requires either point-of-generation disinfection or dedicated liquid-waste collection and transport, since it cannot be bagged or boxed the same way.
Sharps waste, whether the item generating it is technically solid or liquid-contaminated, is always managed as its own third stream (rigid, puncture-resistant, never-reopened containers) rather than folded into either the general-solid or general-liquid pathway — the injury hazard, not the physical state, is what dictates its specific containment.