NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

18-Env-B5 Industrial & Hazardous Waste Management · December 2016

Question 1 of 19: Factors Governing Choice of Industrial Wastewater Treatment Process(es)

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Reference texts: Nemerow & Dasgupta, Industrial and Hazardous Waste Treatment, 2nd ed.; Metcalf & Eddy, Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery, 5th ed.; Davis & Cornwell, Introduction to Environmental Engineering, 6th ed.; LaGrega, Buckingham & Evans, Hazardous Waste Management, 2nd ed.; CCME, Guidelines for the Management of Biomedical Waste in Canada (1992); Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA), 1999; Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes (1989); Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) regulations on radioactive waste; provincial hazardous waste regulations (e.g. BC's Environmental Management Act and Hazardous Waste Regulation).

Question 1: Factors Governing Choice of Industrial Wastewater Treatment Process(es) (5 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Selecting a treatment train for an industrial wastewater is a multi-criteria decision, not a single formula. The dominant factors are:

  1. Waste characteristics — flow rate and its variability, pollutant concentrations (BOD5, COD, TSS, TKN, TP, oils/grease), pH, temperature, and whether any constituent is toxic or biologically inhibitory to a candidate process.
  2. Effluent quality objectives — the discharge point (municipal sewer under a bylaw/surcharge, or direct discharge to a receiving water under a permit) sets the numeric limits the train must meet, which in turn dictates how many treatment stages are required.
  3. Treatability — biodegradability (BOD5/COD ratio), presence of refractory or toxic compounds, and whether the waste needs physical, chemical, biological treatment, or a combination.
  4. Capital and operating cost — construction cost, energy and chemical consumption, sludge handling/disposal cost, and the operator skill level the process demands.
  5. Space availability and site constraints — a compact mechanical process may be forced where land is limited, versus a lagoon-based system where land is cheap.
  6. Sludge/residuals generation and disposal route — some processes (chemical precipitation) generate more sludge requiring dewatering and disposal than others (biological oxidation).
  7. Regulatory requirements and reliability — the process must reliably meet its permit under the full range of expected loading, including upset conditions.
  8. Compatibility with future expansion — flexibility to accommodate production growth or process changes without a full plant rebuild.
← Paper overview