NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

18-Env-B5 Industrial & Hazardous Waste Management · December 2016

Question 15 of 19: Bio-Inhibitory Compound in an Otherwise Biologically-Treatable Waste

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Reference texts: Nemerow & Dasgupta, Industrial and Hazardous Waste Treatment, 2nd ed.; Metcalf & Eddy, Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery, 5th ed.; Davis & Cornwell, Introduction to Environmental Engineering, 6th ed.; LaGrega, Buckingham & Evans, Hazardous Waste Management, 2nd ed.; CCME, Guidelines for the Management of Biomedical Waste in Canada (1992); Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA), 1999; Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes (1989); Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) regulations on radioactive waste; provincial hazardous waste regulations (e.g. BC's Environmental Management Act and Hazardous Waste Regulation).

Question 15: Bio-Inhibitory Compound in an Otherwise Biologically-Treatable Waste (6 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Identification. First confirm and identify the specific inhibitory constituent through toxicity/inhibition testing — bioassay or respirometric (oxygen-uptake-rate) testing against the intended biomass, spiked at a range of concentrations, to pin down which compound(s) (commonly heavy metals, high salinity/TDS, phenolics, certain surfactants, or chlorinated solvents) is responsible and at what concentration inhibition begins.

Handling the problem, in point form:

  1. Pretreat/remove the specific inhibitor before biological treatment — e.g. chemical precipitation for a metal, activated-carbon adsorption or chemical oxidation for an organic inhibitor.
  2. Segregate the inhibitor-bearing stream at source and route it separately (physical/chemical treatment or off-site licensed disposal), keeping the remaining, biologically-treatable streams on the biological train.
  3. Dilute/equalize to bring the inhibitor concentration below its threshold of toxicity to the biomass — workable only where dilution genuinely resolves the mass-loading problem rather than just moving it downstream unresolved.
  4. Acclimate/adapt the biomass over time to tolerate the compound, where the inhibitor is not acutely or permanently toxic — a gradually-enriched, tolerant microbial culture can raise the effective inhibition threshold.
  5. Use a more robust process configuration — e.g. the powdered-activated-carbon activated-sludge (PACT) process, which combines adsorption with biological treatment and buffers episodic toxic shock loads that would otherwise upset a conventional activated-sludge system.
  6. Increase solids retention time (SRT)/biomass concentration to improve process resilience against intermittent low-level inhibition.