NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

18-Env-B5 Industrial & Hazardous Waste Management · May 2016

Question 20 of 24: Estimating Waste Generation and Flow Rates for a Pre-Construction Industry

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Reference texts: Nemerow & Dasgupta, Industrial and Hazardous Waste Treatment, 2nd ed.; Metcalf & Eddy, Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery, 5th ed.; Davis & Cornwell, Introduction to Environmental Engineering, 6th ed.; LaGrega, Buckingham & Evans, Hazardous Waste Management, 2nd ed.; CCME, Guidelines for the Management of Biomedical Waste in Canada (1992); Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA), 1999; Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes (1989); Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) regulations on radioactive waste; provincial hazardous waste regulations (e.g. BC's Environmental Management Act and Hazardous Waste Regulation).

Question 20: Estimating Waste Generation and Flow Rates for a Pre-Construction Industry (5 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

  1. Obtain the detailed process design and mass/water balance from the applicant's engineering firm. A proposed plant's process flow diagram and water-balance calculations (make-up water, process water consumption, evaporative/product losses) give a theoretical first estimate of wastewater flow and load directly from the process chemistry and production rate.
  2. Benchmark against comparable existing facilities. Obtain published unit-loading factors or, where possible, actual monitoring data from an equivalent operating plant elsewhere (same process, similar production scale) as an independent cross-check on the theoretical estimate.
  3. Review equipment vendor data. Water-consumption and wastewater-generation specifications for major process equipment (washers, cooling systems, cleaning-in-place systems) from the equipment suppliers refine the flow estimate to actual hardware rather than a generic process assumption.
  4. Consider pilot-scale or bench-scale testing where feasible. For a novel process with no good published analogue, a bench-scale simulation of the key waste-generating steps can directly measure representative wastewater characteristics before the full plant is built.
  5. Apply a design contingency/safety factor. Because all of the above are estimates, size the treatment or pretreatment system with an appropriate contingency above the best-estimate flow and load to accommodate uncertainty and future production growth.
  6. Build in monitoring and an adjustment mechanism for start-up. Require the plant to monitor its actual wastewater flow and strength once operating, with an agreed process to revisit permit conditions or treatment sizing if actual data diverge materially from the pre-construction estimate.