18-Env-B6 Agricultural Waste Management · May 2018
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
National Exams, May 2018 — 04-Env-B6, Agricultural Waste Management (3 hours, open book, all 16 questions to be attempted, 100 marks total).
Reference texts: Rynk et al., On-Farm Composting Handbook (NRAES-54); OMAFRA, Nutrient Management Act, 2002 and O. Reg. 267/03 / Nutrient Management Protocol (NMAN); Metcalf & Eddy, Wastewater Engineering (anaerobic digestion chapter); ASABE Standards (manure storage, land application equipment); Ontario Environmental Protection Act and Ontario Water Resources Act; Canada–Ontario Lake Erie Action Plan / Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement Annex 4.
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
Part (a) — recipe.
Given. Table A.1 "Average" rows, attached appendix:
| Material | %N (dry wt.) | C:N ratio | Moisture (% wet wt.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broiler litter | 2.7 | 14 | 37 |
| Sawdust | 0.24 | 442 | 39 |
Find. The mass ratio of broiler litter : sawdust : water giving a blended C:N of 30:1 and 60% moisture (wet basis).
Approach. Convert each feedstock's C:N and %N to an equivalent %Carbon (dry basis), blend the two solids on a DRY-MASS basis to hit the target C:N, then add water (no carbon or nitrogen) until the wet-basis moisture reaches 60%.
| Quantity | Value |
|---|---|
| Dry-mass ratio, litter : sawdust | 2.29 : 1 |
| Recipe (wet basis, per 1000 kg litter) | 1000 kg litter : 451 kg sawdust : 812 kg water |
| Wet-mass ratio, litter : sawdust : water | 2.2 : 1 : 1.8 |
| Resulting C:N ratio (check) | 30.0 : 1 |
| Resulting moisture content (check) | 60.0% |
Part (b) — concerns with this mixture.
Data quality of the sawdust entry. Table A.1's average sawdust row implies %C = 106%, a physical impossibility, because the handbook's own note says these values are pooled from different literature sources and "should not be considered as the true ranges or averages" — %N and C:N were not necessarily measured on the same samples. A prudent designer would seek a paired, internally-consistent data point or a fresh lab test rather than trust the average outright; a more typical wood %C≈50% moves the recipe to roughly 1000 kg litter : 957 kg sawdust : 1078 kg water — different quantities, though the qualitative conclusion (substantial bulking agent, large water addition) is unchanged.
Water addition is a large fraction of the mix (36% by mass). Hauling and uniformly incorporating >800 kg water per tonne of litter is a real handling burden; in practice a composter would substitute some water with a wetter co-feedstock (liquid manure, leachate) where available.
Broiler litter's own C:N is only an ESTIMATE (table footnote a: "estimated from ash or volatile solids data"), so the design C:N of 30:1 carries more uncertainty than the arithmetic alone suggests.
Bulk density / mixing behaviour. Sawdust (410 lb/yd³) is far less dense than broiler litter (864 lb/yd³); by volume the pile will look far more sawdust-dominated than the 2.2:1 wet-mass ratio suggests, which can mislead field crews mixing "by eye."
Pathogen and ammonia-loss risk before water is added. The intermediate 37.6% moisture blend sits below the ideal composting range (50–65%), and fresh, N-rich litter is prone to ammonia volatilization if it sits un-composted at that stage — water should be blended in promptly, not staged separately.