NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

18-Env-B6 Agricultural Waste Management · May 2018

Question 5 of 16: Anaerobic Digester Influent vs. Effluent

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams, May 2018 — 04-Env-B6, Agricultural Waste Management (3 hours, open book, all 16 questions to be attempted, 100 marks total).

Reference texts: Rynk et al., On-Farm Composting Handbook (NRAES-54); OMAFRA, Nutrient Management Act, 2002 and O. Reg. 267/03 / Nutrient Management Protocol (NMAN); Metcalf & Eddy, Wastewater Engineering (anaerobic digestion chapter); ASABE Standards (manure storage, land application equipment); Ontario Environmental Protection Act and Ontario Water Resources Act; Canada–Ontario Lake Erie Action Plan / Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement Annex 4.

Question 5: Anaerobic Digester Influent vs. Effluent (5 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Chemical differences. During digestion, microorganisms mineralize a large share of the influent's organic nitrogen into ammonium-N (NH₄⁺-N), so the effluent (digestate) has a HIGHER proportion of its total N in the readily plant-available ammonium form, even though total N is roughly conserved. Volatile solids/organic carbon are destroyed (typically 40–60% VS destruction), leaving mostly as biogas (CH₄+CO₂); pH typically rises slightly from ammonia/bicarbonate buffering; odour is markedly reduced because the readily-degradable, odour-causing organics have already been consumed. Phosphorus and potassium are essentially conserved, so their concentration per unit of remaining solids tends to rise slightly as carbon is lost.

Volume differences. If only manure is digested, influent and effluent liquid volumes are similar (a small mass loss to biogas, mostly gaseous carbon); however, most on-farm digesters co-digest additional feedstocks (crop silage, off-farm organics, dilution water), so the effluent digestate volume requiring storage and land application is usually substantially LARGER than the raw manure volume alone.

Nutrient management program changes. Because digestate N is more plant-available than raw manure of the same type, the available-N factor used to plan application rates should be revised upward relative to Table 4's raw-manure factors, and a fresh lab analysis of the digestate should replace raw-manure typical values (Table 3) since digestion changes the manure's own composition. The higher ammonium content also raises ammonia-volatilization risk if digestate is surface-applied without prompt incorporation, so incorporation timing becomes more critical. If off-farm feedstocks were co-digested, the extra imported nutrients and NASM regulatory classification must be folded into the farm's Nutrient Management Strategy, since the land base now needs to absorb a larger nutrient load than the farm's own manure alone would produce.