Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exams — December 2018 — 18-Geol-A6 Soil Mechanics. Three-hour, closed-book exam; a Casio or Sharp approved calculator, a compass and a ruler are permitted. Six questions constitute the complete 100-mark paper: Questions 1–5 (10+15+20+20+20 marks) are compulsory; Question 6 offers eight 5-mark optional items of which the source asks for three.
Each reading is cross-checked below by an independent physical-consistency test (Q2: the 12%-point saturation comes out to $\approx100\%$, matching its plotted position essentially on the $S=100\%$ curve; Q4: the two digitized curves in Figure Q4-2 are treated as the overconsolidated-clay sample (upper, steep-kneed curve, per the question's own description) and an unused second dataset (lower curve, not needed for a single-sample problem); Q5: the resulting pore pressures give positive effective stress at every point and a linear uplift diagram, the expected signature of a consistent equipotential count). Assumed $G_s=2.70$ (not given) for Q2(c)'s phase relations — typical for a silty/clayey compacted fill and independently supported by the $S\approx100\%$ check above.
Given. Test A (CD triaxial, cohesionless sand): $\sigma_3'=100$ kPa, deviator stress at failure $\Delta\sigma=250$ kPa. Test B (direct shear, same sand): $\sigma_n=60$ kPa held constant, $\tau_f=40$ kPa at failure (the "initial horizontal stress" of 30 kPa is the pre-shear at-rest condition and does not enter the failure-state calculation).
Find. $c'$, $\phi'$; stresses on the failure plane and on the plane of $\tau_{max}$, both tests; principal stresses and plane orientations for Test B; a comparison and discussion of test reliability.
Approach. Both are single-test results on a sand, so $c'=0$ is taken (one Mohr circle tangent to an envelope through the origin fixes $\phi'$ uniquely). For the CD triaxial, $\sigma_1'=\sigma_3'+\Delta\sigma$ gives the circle directly. For the direct shear box the failure plane is forced horizontal by the apparatus, so the stress point $(\sigma_n,\tau_f)$ is the point of tangency; standard Mohr-circle geometry back-calculates $\sigma_1'$, $\sigma_3'$ from it.
Test A — CD triaxial
Failure stresses and $\phi'$. $\sigma_1'=\sigma_3'+\Delta\sigma=100+250=350$ kPa. Taking $c'=0$ (sand), the envelope is a line through the origin tangent to the one available circle:
$$\sin\phi'=\frac{\sigma_1'-\sigma_3'}{\sigma_1'+\sigma_3'}=\frac{250}{450}=0.556 \Rightarrow \boxed{\phi'=33.7^\circ,\ c'=0}$$
Stress on the failure plane. Using the tangent-point relations $\sigma_{ff}=\tfrac12(\sigma_{1f}+\sigma_{3f})-\tfrac12(\sigma_{1f}-\sigma_{3f})\sin\phi'$ and $\tau_{ff}=\sigma_{ff}\tan\phi'$:
$$\sigma_{ff}=225-125(0.556)=\boxed{155.6\text{ kPa}}\qquad \tau_{ff}=155.6\tan(33.7^\circ)=\boxed{103.9\text{ kPa}}$$
Failure-plane angle. $\alpha_{ff}=45^\circ+\phi'/2=45+16.9=\boxed{61.9^\circ}$ (measured from the plane of $\sigma_3'$, i.e. from horizontal on a vertically-loaded specimen).
Maximum shear stress and available strength on that plane. $\tau_{max}=\tfrac12(\sigma_1'-\sigma_3')=\boxed{125\text{ kPa}}$, on the $45^\circ$-plane where $\sigma_n=\tfrac12(\sigma_1'+\sigma_3')=225$ kPa. Available strength there is $\tau_{avail}=\sigma_n\tan\phi'=225\tan(33.7^\circ)=\boxed{150.3\text{ kPa}}>\tau_{max}$, so this plane does not govern (factor of safety $150.3/125=1.20$) — consistent with failure actually occurring on the steeper $61.9^\circ$ plane found above.
Fig. Q3.1 — Test A Mohr circle ($\sigma_3'=100$, $\sigma_1'=350$ kPa) and Mohr-Coulomb envelope ($c'=0$, $\phi'=33.7^\circ$).
Test B — direct shear
Friction angle. The failure plane is forced horizontal, so $(\sigma_n,\tau_f)=(60,40)$ kPa is itself the tangent point of a $c'=0$ envelope:
$$\phi'=\arctan\left(\frac{\tau_f}{\sigma_n}\right)=\arctan\left(\frac{40}{60}\right)=\boxed{33.7^\circ}$$
(matching Test A to within reading precision — both tests are on the same sand).
(a) Principal stresses at failure. For a $c'=0$ tangent point, the circle centre and radius follow from $\sigma_n=p\cos^2\phi'$, i.e. $p=\sigma_n/\cos^2\phi'$ and $R=p\sin\phi'$:
$$p=\frac{60}{\cos^2(33.7^\circ)}=86.7\text{ kPa}\qquad R=86.7\sin(33.7^\circ)=48.1\text{ kPa}$$
$$\boxed{\sigma_1'=p+R=134.7\text{ kPa}}\qquad\boxed{\sigma_3'=p-R=38.6\text{ kPa}}$$
(check: $\sin\phi'=(\sigma_1'-\sigma_3')/(\sigma_1'+\sigma_3')=96.1/173.3=0.555$ — matches.)
(b) Orientation of the failure plane. Horizontal — fixed by the shear-box geometry (the plane between the upper and lower halves of the box).
(c) Orientation of the major principal plane. The failure plane always lies at $\theta_f=45^\circ+\phi'/2=45+16.85=61.85^\circ$ to the major principal plane; since the failure plane is horizontal, the major principal plane is inclined at $\boxed{61.85^\circ\text{ to horizontal}}$ (equivalently, $\sigma_1'$ acts $28.15^\circ$ from vertical).
(d) Plane of $\tau_{max}$, available strength, FoS. $\tau_{max}=R=\boxed{48.1\text{ kPa}}$ on the plane at $45^\circ$ to the principal planes ($\approx16.9^\circ$ to horizontal), where $\sigma_n=p=86.7$ kPa. Available strength $\tau_{avail}=p\tan\phi'=86.7\tan(33.7^\circ)=\boxed{57.8\text{ kPa}}$; $\text{FoS}=57.8/48.1=\boxed{1.20}$ — essentially identical to Test A's $1.20$ on its own $45^\circ$ plane. This is not a coincidence: on the $45^\circ$ plane $\sigma_n=p$, $\tau=p\sin\phi'$, so $\text{FoS}=\tan\phi'/\sin\phi'=1/\cos\phi'$ regardless of the stress magnitude — a function of $\phi'$ alone, which is why both tests (same soil, same $\phi'$) agree.
(e) Which test to trust. The CD triaxial (Test A) is the more reliable result. It applies a uniform, known stress state to the full specimen and lets the failure plane develop wherever the soil's own strength dictates, with drainage and volume change monitored throughout so the effective stress path is known exactly. The direct shear test, in contrast, forces failure onto a single predetermined horizontal plane regardless of whether that is the true weakest orientation, concentrates stress non-uniformly near the box edges, and cannot measure pore pressure directly (drainage is only inferred from a slow shearing rate) — so while it is quick and simple to run, its $\phi'$ is a reasonable estimate rather than a rigorous one. Test A procedure: saturate the specimen under back pressure, consolidate under the cell pressure $\sigma_3'$ with drainage open until volume change ceases, then shear axially at a slow, drained rate (valve open, no excess pore pressure) while recording axial load, displacement and volume change to failure. Test B procedure: place the specimen in the split shear box, apply the vertical (normal) load $\sigma_n$ and allow consolidation, then displace the upper half horizontally at a slow rate while recording shear force and both vertical and horizontal displacement until the shear force peaks (failure).
Fig. Q3.2 — Test B: back-calculated Mohr circle from the direct-shear failure point $(60,40)$ kPa.