NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

18-Geol-A6 Soil Mechanics · December 2018

Question 6 of 6: Optional Questions

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams — December 2018 — 18-Geol-A6 Soil Mechanics. Three-hour, closed-book exam; a Casio or Sharp approved calculator, a compass and a ruler are permitted. Six questions constitute the complete 100-mark paper: Questions 1–5 (10+15+20+20+20 marks) are compulsory; Question 6 offers eight 5-mark optional items of which the source asks for three.

Reference texts: Das, Principles of Geotechnical Engineering, 9th ed. — USCS classification, phase relations, compaction, permeability/seepage, consolidation; Craig's Soil Mechanics (Craig & Knappett), 8th ed. — effective stress, shear strength, seepage/flow nets, consolidation theory.

Each reading is cross-checked below by an independent physical-consistency test (Q2: the 12%-point saturation comes out to $\approx100\%$, matching its plotted position essentially on the $S=100\%$ curve; Q4: the two digitized curves in Figure Q4-2 are treated as the overconsolidated-clay sample (upper, steep-kneed curve, per the question's own description) and an unused second dataset (lower curve, not needed for a single-sample problem); Q5: the resulting pore pressures give positive effective stress at every point and a linear uplift diagram, the expected signature of a consistent equipotential count). Assumed $G_s=2.70$ (not given) for Q2(c)'s phase relations — typical for a silty/clayey compacted fill and independently supported by the $S\approx100\%$ check above.

Question 6: Optional Questions (5 marks each; source asks for 3 of 8, all 8 answered)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Check: the paper instructs "answer three of the following five questions" but prints eight items (1–8); all 8 optional items are answered below.

(6.1) Darcy's Law

Darcy's law states that the discharge velocity through a saturated porous medium is proportional to the hydraulic gradient: $$v=ki \qquad\text{or, as a total flow rate,}\qquad q=vA=kiA$$ where $i=\Delta h/L$ is the hydraulic gradient (head loss per unit length of flow path), $v$ is the discharge (superficial) velocity — a bulk quantity averaged over the whole cross-section $A$, not the faster true velocity within the pores — and $k$ is the hydraulic conductivity (units of velocity), a property of both the soil's pore structure and the permeant fluid.

soil, k, area AΔhh₁h₂q = kiAL
Fig. Q6.1 — Darcy permeameter: head loss $\Delta h=h_1-h_2$ over path length $L$ drives flow $q$ through area $A$.

(6.2) Effective stress between two grains

At any horizontal plane through a saturated soil, the total normal stress $\sigma$ is carried partly by inter-particle contact forces and partly by the pressure of the water filling the voids. Consider a wavy plane threading between grain contacts, of gross area $A$: the total force is $\sigma A$. The pore water carries $u(A-a_c)\approx uA$ (contact area $a_c$ is a negligible fraction of $A$ for real soils), leaving the grain-to-grain contact forces to carry the rest: $$\sigma A = N' + u(A-a_c) \approx N'+uA \quad\Rightarrow\quad \sigma'=\frac{N'}{A}=\sigma-u$$ $\sigma'$ (the effective stress) is what actually controls soil strength and compressibility, since only the inter-granular contact forces resist shearing or squeeze the skeleton together — the pore pressure $u$ acts equally in all directions on the (nearly incompressible) grains and does no work compressing the skeleton.

contact force Npore water, uA (gross area)
Fig. Q6.2 — Two grains in contact, submerged: total stress $\sigma$ splits into inter-granular contact force $N'$ (over gross area $A$) and pore pressure $u$.

(6.3) Capillary rise and unsaturated retention curves

In a thin capillary tube inserted into free water, surface tension $T_s$ at the curved air-water meniscus pulls water up until the vertical component of the tension force balances the weight of the risen column: $$h_c=\frac{4T_s\cos\alpha}{\gamma_w d}$$ where $d$ is the tube diameter and $\alpha$ the contact angle (near $0^\circ$ for a clean, water-wet tube). Smaller pores (smaller effective $d$) support a taller capillary rise and a larger negative (suction) pore pressure. Soil pores act as an irregular bundle of such capillaries: the soil-water characteristic (retention) curve plots degree of saturation against matric suction, and is essentially a distribution of the soil's effective pore sizes — fine-grained soils (small pores, high capillary suction) retain water at much higher suction than coarse sands, giving a retention curve that stays near full saturation over a much wider suction range before draining.

free water surfacehᴄ (capillary rise)d (tube dia.)
Fig. Q6.3 — Capillary rise $h_c$ in a tube of diameter $d$ above a free-water surface.

(6.4) Sand cone field compaction test

Given. Volume excavated $V=1165\text{ cm}^3$; wet mass $=2600$ g; dry mass $=1645$ g.

  1. (a) Field dry density. $$\rho_d=\frac{M_{dry}}{V}=\frac{1645}{1165}=1.412\text{ g/cm}^3=\boxed{1412\text{ kg/m}^3}\ (\gamma_d=\rho_d g=13.85\text{ kN/m}^3)$$
  2. (b) Field water content. $$w=\frac{M_{wet}-M_{dry}}{M_{dry}}=\frac{2600-1645}{1645}=\boxed{58.1\%}$$

(6.5) Groundwater table and total head components

The groundwater table (GWT, or water table) is the surface within a soil mass at which pore pressure equals atmospheric ($u=0$); below it the soil is (in the simplest static case) fully saturated with a hydrostatic pore-pressure distribution, and above it the soil is unsaturated (or, immediately above, can carry negative pore pressure by capillarity). For a 5 m sand layer with the GWT 1.5 m below the ground surface, total head $h_t$ is constant with depth below the GWT under static (no-flow) conditions — there is no hydraulic gradient to drive flow — while elevation head $z$ decreases and pressure head $h_p=u/\gamma_w$ increases linearly with depth below the GWT, so that $h_t=z+h_p$ stays fixed.

GWT, 1.5 m below surfaceztotal head hₜ = const. (hydrostatic)hₚ grows linearly with depth below GWTGround surfaceBase (5 m)
Fig. Q6.5 — Total, elevation and pressure head vs. depth, 5 m sand layer, GWT at 1.5 m (hydrostatic, no-flow condition).

(6.6) Consistency, water content, and Atterberg limits

A clay's strength and stiffness fall steeply as its water content rises through the Atterberg limits. Below the plastic limit ($PL$), the soil is in the semi-solid/solid state: stiff, brittle, and relatively strong, with particle-to-particle contacts largely intact. Between $PL$ and the liquid limit ($LL$) the soil is plastic: it can be remoulded without cracking, but strength and stiffness both decrease steadily as $w$ increases toward $LL$, because the added water thickens the double layers separating clay platelets and reduces inter-particle attraction. Above $LL$, the soil behaves as a viscous liquid with negligible shear strength. The liquidity index $I_L=(w-PL)/(LL-PL)$ quantifies where a soil's current water content sits within this range, and correlates directly with undrained shear strength: $I_L$ near 0 (near $PL$) indicates a stiff, strong clay, while $I_L$ near 1 (near $LL$) indicates a soft, weak one.

(6.7) Falling head permeability test

Given. Specimen $D=5$ cm, $L=10$ cm; burette $d=0.5$ cm; head falls $h_1=125\text{ cm}\to h_2=115\text{ cm}$ in $t=35\text{ min}=2100$ s.

  1. (a) Hydraulic conductivity. $$k=\frac{aL}{At}\ln\frac{h_1}{h_2},\qquad a=\frac{\pi}{4}(0.5)^2=0.1963\text{ cm}^2,\ A=\frac{\pi}{4}(5)^2=19.63\text{ cm}^2$$ $$k=\frac{0.1963\times10}{19.63\times2100}\ln\left(\frac{125}{115}\right)=\boxed{3.97\times10^{-6}\text{ cm/s}}$$
  2. (b) Soil type. $k\approx4\times10^{-6}$ cm/s falls in the $10^{-5}$–$10^{-7}$ cm/s band typical of a low-permeability fine-grained soil — $\boxed{\text{a silt (or clayey silt), not a sand}}$; a falling-head (rather than constant-head) apparatus is itself standard practice specifically because sands drain too fast for a falling-head test to resolve.

(6.8) Phase relations from $w$, $e$, $G_s$

Given. $w=15\%$, $e=0.54$, $G_s=2.6$.

  1. Dry density. $$\gamma_d=\frac{G_s\gamma_w}{1+e}=\frac{2.6\times9.81}{1.54}=\boxed{16.56\text{ kN/m}^3}\ (\rho_d=1688\text{ kg/m}^3)$$
  2. Degree of saturation. $$S=\frac{wG_s}{e}=\frac{0.15\times2.6}{0.54}=\boxed{72.2\%}$$
  3. Volumetric water content. $n=e/(1+e)=0.54/1.54=0.351$; $$\theta=Sn=0.722\times0.351=\boxed{25.3\%}$$
ItemResult
6.4 field dry density; water content1412 kg/m³ (13.85 kN/m³); 58.1%
6.7 hydraulic conductivity; soil type3.97×10-6 cm/s; silt
6.8 $\gamma_d$; $S$; $\theta$16.56 kN/m³; 72.2%; 25.3%
Back to the paper →