NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

18-Geol-A6 Soil Mechanics · December 2019

Question 1 of 6: Classification

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams, December 2019 — 18-Geol-A6, Soil Mechanics (3 hours, closed book). Six questions constitute a complete exam: Questions 1–5 are compulsory; for Question 6, candidates choose 3 of 8 optional sub-questions (5 marks each) — all 8 are solved below as a complete study resource.

Reference texts: Das, Principles of Geotechnical Engineering; Craig's Soil Mechanics (Craig & Knappett); Freeze & Cherry, Groundwater (seepage/flow-net topics).

graphically-read values (compaction curve extrapolation, oedometer Casagrande construction, flow-net equipotential positions) are flagged with individual check callouts below where the read/assumed value materially affects the answer.

Question 1: Classification (10 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. The percent-finer sieve data above for two soils, plus Atterberg limits: Soil A — $LL=30\%$, $PL=27\%$; Soil B — $LL=40\%$, $PL=30\%$.

Find. Plot both grain-size distribution curves and assign each soil its Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) group symbol.

0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Particle size (mm, log scale) Percent passing (%) D10 D30 D60 — Soil A — Soil B Silt Sand Gravel
Grain-size distribution curves for Soils A and B (semi-log), with Soil A's $D_{10}$, $D_{30}$, $D_{60}$ marked.

Approach. Read $D_{10}$, $D_{30}$, $D_{60}$ off the curve to get $C_u$ and $C_c$ for the coarse fraction, split each soil into gravel/sand/fines by the No. 4 and No. 200 sieves, then walk the USCS coarse-/fine-grained branch using the fines percentage and the plasticity chart.

  1. Split Soil A into gravel, sand, and fines. Percent retained on No. 4 (4.76 mm) $=100-72=28\%$ gravel; percent between No. 4 and No. 200 (75 $\mu$m) $=72-8=64\%$ sand; percent passing No. 200 $=8\%$ fines. The coarse fraction (gravel+sand$=92\%$) exceeds half the sample, so Soil A is coarse-grained; within the coarse fraction, sand ($64\%$) exceeds gravel ($28\%$), so the base symbol is S (sand).
  2. Grade Soil A's coarse fraction. Interpolating the semi-log curve (log-linear between bracketing sieve points) for the 10/30/60% finer sizes: $$D_{10}=0.106\text{ mm}, \quad D_{30}=0.336\text{ mm}, \quad D_{60}=3.26\text{ mm}$$ $$C_u=\frac{D_{60}}{D_{10}}=\frac{3.26}{0.106}=30.8 \qquad C_c=\frac{(D_{30})^2}{D_{10}D_{60}}=\frac{0.336^2}{0.106\times 3.26}=0.33$$
  3. Apply the fines-content branch. Soil A's fines ($8\%$) fall in the $5$–$12\%$ borderline band, which requires a dual symbol (gradation symbol + plasticity symbol). Gradation: SW needs $C_u>6$ (met, $30.8$) and $1SP. Plasticity: $I_p=LL-PL=30-27=3\%<4$, so the fines plot below the $I_p=4$ cut → plasticity half is M. $$\boxed{\text{Soil A} = \text{SP--SM (poorly graded sand with silt)}}$$
  4. Split and classify Soil B. Gravel $=100-91=9\%$; sand $=91-55=36\%$; fines $=55\%$. Fines exceed $50\%$, so Soil B is fine-grained, classified from its position on the plasticity (A-line) chart rather than its gradation. $I_p=LL-PL=40-30=10\%$. Liquid limit $LL=40\%<50\%$, so the "L" (low-to-medium plasticity) branch applies.
  5. Locate Soil B relative to the A-line. A-line: $I_p=0.73(LL-20)=0.73(40-20)=14.6\%$. Since the measured $I_p=10\% < 14.6\%$, Soil B plots below the A-line (and is well clear of the $I_p=4$–$7$ borderline hatch), placing it in the silt (M) region with $LL<50\%$: $$\boxed{\text{Soil B} = \text{ML (inorganic silt of low plasticity, sandy)}}$$
Final results
QuantitySoil ASoil B
Gravel / Sand / Fines28% / 64% / 8%9% / 36% / 55%
$C_u$, $C_c$ (coarse fraction)30.8, 0.33— (fine-grained)
$I_p$3%10%
USCS group symbolSP–SMML
← Paper overview