18-Geol-A7 Applied Geophysics · Undated paper
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
National Exams — Applied Geophysics (18-Geol-A7), undated filing. Three-hour, closed-book exam; an approved calculator is permitted. The paper offers a choice of six of the following ten questions, each worth 16.66% of the total mark, and every question requires an essay-format answer with diagrams as appropriate — this is a genuinely all-essay sitting with no numeric data table or figure supplied. All ten questions are answered below so the set stands as a complete study resource for choose-N-of-M exams.
Reference texts: Telford, Geldart & Sheriff, Applied Geophysics (2nd ed.) — the primary reference for every method touched in this paper (gravity, magnetics, electrical/EM, seismic reflection/refraction, well logging, gamma-ray spectrometry); Kearey, Brooks & Hill, An Introduction to Geophysical Exploration (3rd ed.) — survey planning, instrumentation, data reduction and case-history context; Blakely, Potential Theory in Gravity and Magnetic Applications — gravity/magnetic instrumentation and correction theory (Q2, Q5); Selley & Sonnenberg, Elements of Petroleum Geology — well-logging context (Q3, Q9).
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
Acoustic impedance. Acoustic impedance is defined as the product of a medium's bulk density and its compressional-wave velocity, $Z=\rho V_p$. It is important because a seismic reflection is generated at any interface where impedance changes — the normal-incidence reflection coefficient is $R=(Z_2-Z_1)/(Z_2+Z_1)$ — so reflection strength depends jointly on BOTH density and velocity contrast, and a boundary with a large velocity change but negligible density change (or vice versa) can still produce a weak reflection if the two effects happen to offset one another. Critically, no reflection is produced across a boundary with no impedance contrast, however geologically important that boundary may be, which is the fundamental reason the seismic reflection method images impedance discontinuities rather than geological units directly.
Sonic log. A sonic (acoustic) log is a wireline logging tool that measures the compressional-wave interval transit time ($\Delta t$, in µs/ft or µs/m) of the formation immediately around a borehole: a transmitter emits an acoustic pulse and two or more receivers at fixed spacing time its first arrival, giving $\Delta t=1/V_p$ directly at each depth sampled. Because it is run alongside a density log (or density can be estimated from a standard velocity-density relation) at the SAME borehole, the sonic log directly yields $Z=\rho V_p$ as a continuous function of depth.
Use in processing and interpretation. The sonic (and density) log's continuous impedance profile is used to build a SYNTHETIC SEISMOGRAM: the reflection coefficient series computed from the logs is convolved with an estimate of the seismic source wavelet to predict what the surface reflection survey should record at that well location. This synthetic is then TIED to the actual surface seismic section, which serves two essential purposes: it converts the seismic section from travel TIME into DEPTH using the well's own accurately known depth-vs-time relationship (a velocity/checkshot survey), and it identifies exactly which reflection event on the seismic section corresponds to which known stratigraphic marker in the well, resolving what would otherwise be an ambiguous time-domain interpretation. The sonic log's high vertical resolution (cm-scale) compared to the seismic section's own resolution (tens of metres, set by the dominant wavelength) also lets an interpreter recognize that a single "seismic reflector" may in fact represent the composite response of several closely spaced thin-bed interfaces, informing how confidently a specific bed can be picked on the seismic data alone away from well control.