NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

18-Geom-A1 Surveying · May 2019

Question 4 of 9: Differential-Levelling Notes, Misclosure and Compass-Rule Adjustment

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams — 04-Geom-A1 Surveying, May 2019. Closed-book; approved Casio or Sharp calculator permitted. Format: nine (9) questions of varied value totalling 100 marks constitute a complete paper; all nine are solved below. Elevations are referenced to the Canadian vertical frame (CGVD2013) and azimuths to NAD83(CSRS) unless the printed question states otherwise.

Reference texts: Wolf & Ghilani, Elementary Surveying: An Introduction to Geomatics (15th ed., Pearson); Ghilani, Adjustment Computations: Spatial Data Analysis (6th ed., Wiley); Kavanagh & Slattery, Surveying with Construction Applications (8th ed.); Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee, Standards and Specifications for Geodetic Control Networks (1984).

Question 4: Differential-Levelling Notes, Misclosure and Compass-Rule Adjustment (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. A closed levelling loop that starts on B.M.1 (height $225.412$ m), passes through benchmarks B.M.2 and B.M.3 and seven turning points, and closes back on B.M.1, with ten instrument setups.

Find. The completed notes ($\Delta H$, adjusted $\Delta H$ and heights), the arithmetic checks, the loop misclosure, and the compass-rule adjusted heights of B.M.2 and B.M.3.

BM.1H_BM.1TP1TP2TP3BM.2H_BM.2TP4TP5BM.3H_BM.3TP6TP7BM.1H_BM.1
Closed differential-levelling loop BM.1 → … → BM.1 through benchmarks BM.2, BM.3 and seven turning points.

Approach. Reduce the notes by rise and fall: each setup gives $\Delta H = \text{B.S.} - \text{F.S.}$ to the next point. Apply the page check, compare the loop’s net change with zero to get the misclosure, then distribute it by the compass rule. No section lengths are given, so assume equal sight lengths, which makes the correction proportional to the number of setups.

  1. Height differences. Each setup’s backsight minus the next foresight gives, for example, B.M.1→TP1: $3.150 - 3.346 = -0.196$ m, and TP4→TP5: $0.089 - 3.736 = -3.647$ m. Carried down the loop, these give the completed field notes:
    StationB.S.F.S.ΔH (m)Unadjusted height (m)Adjusted ΔH (m)Adjusted height (m)
    B.M.13.150——225.412—225.4120
    TP12.8313.346−0.196225.216−0.2032225.2088
    TP24.1042.725+0.106225.322+0.0988225.3076
    TP32.6543.008+1.096226.418+1.0888226.3964
    B.M.20.3683.208−0.554225.864−0.5612225.8352
    TP40.0891.534−1.166224.698−1.1732224.6620
    TP52.8633.736−3.647221.051−3.6542221.0078
    B.M.33.3560.100+2.763223.814+2.7558223.7636
    TP62.7811.662+1.694225.508+1.6868225.4504
    TP73.3650.111+2.670228.178+2.6628228.1132
    B.M.1—6.059−2.694225.484−2.7012225.4120
    Σ / check25.56125.489ΣΔH = +0.072e = +0.072Σ = 0.0000closes
  2. Customary arithmetic (page) check. $$ \Sigma\text{B.S.} - \Sigma\text{F.S.} = 25.561 - 25.489 = +0.072\text{ m} = \Sigma\Delta H = H_{\text{end}} - H_{\text{start}} = 225.484 - 225.412. $$ All three agree, so the reduction arithmetic is correct.
  3. Misclosure. The loop starts and ends on B.M.1, so its true net change is zero. Therefore $$ \boxed{e = \Sigma\Delta H - 0 = +0.072\text{ m}} $$ The unadjusted closing height of B.M.1 is 225.484 m against the known 225.412 m. For scale, if the ten setups cover about 1 km, the Canadian allowances would be 24 mm (Third Order) and 120 mm (Fourth Order), so a 72 mm closure is Fourth-Order work. That is acceptable for construction or topographic control but not for benchmarks of a higher order.
  4. Compass-rule distribution. With equal setups, each $\Delta H$ receives $$ c = -\frac{e}{n} = -\frac{0.072}{10} = -0.0072\text{ m per setup}, $$ which gives the adjusted $\Delta H$ column. The adjusted $\Delta H$ values sum to zero, and the running heights return exactly to 225.412 m at B.M.1. The adjusted benchmark heights are $$ \boxed{\text{B.M.2} = 225.835\text{ m}}, \qquad \boxed{\text{B.M.3} = 223.764\text{ m}}. $$
QuantityValue
$\Sigma$ Backsights / $\Sigma$ Foresights$25.561$ / $25.489$ m
Loop misclosure $e$$+0.072$ m
Correction per setup (compass rule, 10 setups)$-0.0072$ m
Adjusted height, B.M.2$225.835$ m
Adjusted height, B.M.3$223.764$ m
Closing height, B.M.1 (after adjustment)$225.412$ m