23-Ind-A4 Production Management · Undated paper
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
National Examinations — May 2019 — 17-Ind-A4 Production Management. Three-hour, closed-book exam; Casio or Sharp approved calculators only. Format: eight questions, each worth 20 marks (10/10 sub-part split per the front-page marking scheme); candidates do two questions from Section A and three from Section B, and only the first five questions appearing in the answer book are marked. All eight are solved below for completeness. The paper asks for point-form answers wherever possible; the solutions below use full working for clarity.
Reference texts: Nahmias & Olsen, Production and Operations Analysis (7th ed., Waveland/McGraw-Hill) — forecasting, inventory (EOQ/EPQ) and aggregate planning; Sipper & Bulfin, Production: Planning, Control, and Integration — production scheduling, JIT/kanban and shop-floor implementation gaps; Hillier & Lieberman, Introduction to Operations Research (11th ed.) — LP formulation and project scheduling (CPM/PERT); Pinedo, Scheduling: Theory, Algorithms, and Systems (5th ed.) — parallel-machine scheduling and days-off workforce scheduling; Hopp & Spearman, Factory Physics (3rd ed.) — variability, buffering, and production scheduling; Liker, The Toyota Way, Shingo, A Revolution in Manufacturing: The SMED System, and Shingo, Zero Quality Control: Source Inspection and the Poka-Yoke System — 5S, Five Whys, poka-yoke, SMED and lean root-cause analysis; R.W. Hall, Zero Inventories — the “seven zeros” JIT framework.
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
The “seven zeros” is a just-in-time production framework (associated with R.W. Hall's Zero Inventories) that states the goal of a lean production system as seven simultaneous, idealized targets:
They work because each of the seven targets attacks one specific root cause of waste or variability, and driving all seven toward zero together — rather than trading one off against another — is what lets a line run with minimal buffers while still meeting demand: zero defects removes rework and scrap (a quality-driven variability source that otherwise forces extra WIP and inspection buffers); zero setups is what makes zero lot size economically viable, since a large batch only exists in the first place to amortize a slow changeover, and small batches directly shorten flow time; zero breakdowns removes machine-availability variability; zero handling minimizes non-value-added motion and damage risk between operations; zero lead time is the cumulative result of the other six being achieved; and zero surging prevents the plant from absorbing demand shocks as sudden capacity spikes. By Little's law, flow time $W$ and work-in-process $L$ are locked together at a given throughput $\lambda$ ($L=\lambda W$) — every one of the seven zeros is, in effect, another way of shrinking $W$ (or the variability that forces a buffer around $W$), so pursuing all seven together compounds rather than conflicts, which is why the framework treats them as one integrated target rather than seven separate initiatives.