NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

21-Mat-A1 Thermodynamics · May 2015

Question 5 of 7: Gibbs Energy of Mixing Ideal Gases

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams — May 2015 — 10-Met-A1 Metallurgical Thermodynamics. Three-hour, closed-book exam using an approved (Casio or Sharp) calculator; candidates were told to state any interpretive assumptions. Any five of the seven questions constitute a complete paper — all seven are solved below for completeness. All questions are of equal value (20 marks each out of 100).

Reference texts: Gaskell, D. R., Introduction to the Thermodynamics of Materials (2nd–5th ed.) — the exam's own Ellingham diagram (Fig. 9-3) is reproduced from this text, which also supplies the standard-state enthalpy/entropy data used below; supporting 298 K entropies for the elements, CO, CO₂, H₂, H₂O(g) and Cu₂O/Cr₂O₃/TiO₂/SiO₂ from the NIST–JANAF Thermochemical Tables.

Question 5: Gibbs Energy of Mixing Ideal Gases (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. Ideal gases at $T=298$ K, total $P=1$ atm throughout. (a) 1 mol O₂ + 1 mol N₂. (b) 1 mol O₂ + 2 mol N₂. (c) 1 additional mole of pure O₂ added into an existing 1:1 mol O₂/N₂ mixture (from part a), forming a final mixture of 2 mol O₂ + 1 mol N₂.

Find. $\Delta G_{mix}$ for each of the three mixing processes.

Approach. For ideal gases, $\Delta G_{mix}=RT\sum_i n_i\ln x_i$ when pure components are combined from scratch. Part (c) is different in kind — it adds pure O₂ to a mixture that is already mixed — so its $\Delta G$ is the difference between the Gibbs energy of forming the final 3-mole mixture from scratch and that of the initial 2-mole mixture (the pure O₂ being added contributes no mixing term by itself).

  1. (a) 1 mol O₂ + 1 mol N₂. $x_{O_2}=x_{N_2}=0.5$. $$\Delta G_{mix}=RT\big[1\ln(0.5)+1\ln(0.5)\big]=(8.314)(298)(2\ln0.5)=\boxed{-3434.6\ \text{J}}.$$
  2. (b) 1 mol O₂ + 2 mol N₂. $x_{O_2}=1/3$, $x_{N_2}=2/3$. $$\Delta G_{mix}=RT\big[1\ln(1/3)+2\ln(2/3)\big]=(8.314)(298)(-1.9095)=\boxed{-4731.0\ \text{J}}.$$
  3. (c) Adding 1 mol O₂ to the 1:1 mixture from (a). The final mixture is 2 mol O₂ + 1 mol N₂ ($x_{O_2}=2/3$, $x_{N_2}=1/3$). Its own from-scratch mixing energy uses the identical pair of mole-fraction terms as part (b) (just the O₂/N₂ labels swapped, 2 mol at $x=2/3$ and 1 mol at $x=1/3$), so numerically $$\Delta G_{mix}(\text{final, from scratch})=RT\big[2\ln(2/3)+1\ln(1/3)\big]=-4731.0\ \text{J (same value as part b).}$$ The process actually asked for is this final mixture minus the initial 1:1 mixture from part (a) — the incoming mole of O₂ is pure, so it carries zero mixing-Gibbs-energy of its own: $$\Delta G=\Delta G_{mix}(\text{final})-\Delta G_{mix}(\text{initial, part a})=-4731.0-(-3434.6)=\boxed{-1296.4\ \text{J}}.$$
CaseΔGmix
(a) 1 mol O₂ + 1 mol N₂−3434.6 J
(b) 1 mol O₂ + 2 mol N₂−4731.0 J
(c) +1 mol O₂ into the (a) mixture−1296.4 J