NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

21-Mat-A4 Deformation Behaviour and Properties of Materials · December 2016

Question 6 of 7: Dislocation Theory and Grain Boundaries (20 marks)

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. National Exams, December 2016 — 10-Met-A4, Structure of Materials. Three hours, closed book, one approved calculator (Casio or Sharp). Seven questions of 20 marks each (Roman numerals I–VII); the rubric asks for any five, with only the first five in the answer book marked. All seven are solved here, because this set is a study resource rather than an exam script. All necessary equations, constants and an error-function table are provided in the exam's own appendix (reproduced where used below).

Note on the exam title. The printed exam header reads 10-Met-A4, Structure of Materials. Only Question VI (dislocation theory) is genuinely deformation/mechanical-properties content; the paper as a whole is a broad introductory materials-science survey — electron structure, bonding, crystal structure, crystallographic directions/planes, solid solubility, XRD, microscopy and phase diagrams — and is answered as such below.

Reference texts. The answers below are keyed to the works normally recommended for this syllabus code:


Question VI — Dislocation Theory and Grain Boundaries (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

VI.1 — Schmid's law; slip plane normal to the tensile axis

Schmid's law. Slip begins on a given slip system once the shear stress resolved onto that system's slip plane, in its slip direction, reaches a critical value (the critical resolved shear stress, CRSS, $\tau_{crss}$). For an applied uniaxial tensile stress $\sigma$, the resolved shear stress is $$\tau_R=\sigma\cos\phi\cos\lambda$$ where $\phi$ is the angle between the tensile axis and the slip plane's normal, and $\lambda$ is the angle between the tensile axis and the slip direction (which lies within the slip plane, so $\phi$ and $\lambda$ are not independent — but the formula uses both as measured from the load axis). Slip occurs on the system with the largest $\tau_R$, once $\tau_R\ge\tau_{crss}$.

Slip plane normal to the applied stress. If the slip plane is normal to the tensile axis, the tensile axis is parallel to the slip-plane normal, so $\phi=0^{\circ}$ and $\cos\phi=1$. But the slip direction lies within the slip plane, i.e. perpendicular to that same normal — so the tensile axis is also perpendicular to the slip direction, $\lambda=90^{\circ}$ and $\cos\lambda=0$. Then $$\tau_R=\sigma\cos(0^{\circ})\cos(90^{\circ})=\sigma(1)(0)=\boxed{0}$$ Since the resolved shear stress is exactly zero regardless of the applied stress magnitude $\sigma$, no slip can occur on this system for this orientation, no matter how large $\sigma$ is made (short of fracture). This is one of the two special "Schmid-factor-zero" orientations (the other being the slip direction itself parallel to the tensile axis, $\lambda=0^{\circ}$, which gives $\phi=90^{\circ}$ and the same null result).

VI.2 — Main HCP slip systems

The dominant HCP slip system, active in essentially all HCP metals, is the basal system: the $(0001)$ basal plane (the closest-packed plane in HCP) in the $\langle11\bar20\rangle$ close-packed directions (three equivalent directions in that plane) — written $\{0001\}\langle11\bar20\rangle$, giving 3 independent slip systems (1 plane × 3 directions). This is favoured because the basal plane has both the highest planar atomic density (Question III.2's APF geometry) and the shortest slip-direction repeat distance ($\langle11\bar20\rangle$, of length exactly $a$), minimising the Peierls (lattice friction) stress. Metals with a low $c/a$ ratio (e.g. Ti, Zr, below the ideal 1.633) additionally activate secondary prismatic $\{10\bar10\}\langle11\bar20\rangle$ and pyramidal $\{10\bar11\}\langle11\bar20\rangle$ systems, needed (together with basal slip and twinning) to supply the 5 independent slip systems von Mises' criterion requires for arbitrary polycrystalline ductility — a requirement basal slip alone, with only 3 systems (two of which are dependent for a given basal plane), cannot meet.

VI.3a — Burgers vector of an edge dislocation in FCC copper

Given. Copper, FCC, lattice constant $a=3.615$ Å.

Find. Burgers vector direction and magnitude $|\vec b|$.

Approach. In FCC metals the slip (and Burgers vector) direction is $\langle110\rangle$, the face diagonal, because the shortest full lattice-translation vector runs corner-to-face-centre-to-corner along that diagonal: $\vec b=\tfrac{a}{2}\langle110\rangle$.

  1. Burgers vector. $$\vec b=\frac{a}{2}[110], \qquad |\vec b|=\frac{a}{2}\sqrt{1^2+1^2+0^2}=\frac{a}{\sqrt2}=\frac{3.615}{\sqrt2}=\boxed{2.556\ \text{\AA}\ (=2.556\times10^{-10}\ \text{m})}$$

VI.3b — CRSS at a higher dislocation density

Given. $\tau_{crss,1}=2.10$ MPa at $\rho_1=10^5$/mm²; $G=48$ GPa; $\alpha=0.2$; $b=2.556\times10^{-10}$ m (from VI.3a); target $\rho_2=10^7$/mm².

Find. $\tau_{crss,2}$ at $\rho_2$.

Approach. Use the first data point to back out the intrinsic strength $\tau_0=\tau_{crss,1}-\alpha Gb\sqrt{\rho_1}$, then evaluate $\tau_{crss,2}=\tau_0+\alpha Gb\sqrt{\rho_2}$ (converting $\rho$ from /mm² to /m² throughout so units are consistent with $G$ in Pa and $b$ in m).

  1. Convert dislocation densities to SI. $$\rho_1=10^5\ \text{mm}^{-2}=10^{11}\ \text{m}^{-2}, \qquad \rho_2=10^7\ \text{mm}^{-2}=10^{13}\ \text{m}^{-2}$$
  2. Back out $\tau_0$ from the first data point. $$\alpha Gb\sqrt{\rho_1}=(0.2)(48\times10^{9})(2.556\times10^{-10})\sqrt{10^{11}}=0.776\ \text{MPa}$$ $$\tau_0=\tau_{crss,1}-\alpha Gb\sqrt{\rho_1}=2.10-0.776=1.324\ \text{MPa}$$
  3. Evaluate at $\rho_2$. $$\alpha Gb\sqrt{\rho_2}=(0.2)(48\times10^{9})(2.556\times10^{-10})\sqrt{10^{13}}=7.760\ \text{MPa}$$ $$\tau_{crss,2}=\tau_0+\alpha Gb\sqrt{\rho_2}=1.324+7.760=\boxed{9.08\ \text{MPa}}$$

A 100-fold rise in dislocation density (from $10^5$ to $10^7$/mm², a $\sqrt{100}=10$-fold rise in $\sqrt{\rho}$) raises the CRSS by a factor of about 4.3, from 2.10 to 9.08 MPa — exactly the strain-hardening mechanism this question sets up: each new dislocation's stress field impedes the motion of others, so a heavily deformed (dislocation-dense) metal is measurably stronger than the same metal in its annealed (low-$\rho$) state.