NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

21-Mat-A4 Deformation Behaviour and Properties of Materials · December 2018

Question 3 of 7: Question III: Crystal Structure I

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. National Exams, December 2018 — 10-Met-A4, Structure of Materials. Three hours, closed book, one approved calculator (Casio or Sharp). Seven questions of 20 marks each (Roman numerals I–VII); the rubric asks for any five, with only the first five in the answer book marked. All seven are solved here, because this set is a study resource rather than an exam script. All necessary equations, constants and an error-function table are provided in the exam's own appendix (reproduced where used below).

Note on the exam title. The printed exam header reads 10-Met-A4, Structure of Materials. Only Question VI.2(c) (grain-size strengthening) touches mechanical/deformation properties directly; the paper as a whole is a broad introductory materials-science survey — atomic structure, bonding, crystal structure/directions/planes, point defects, XRD, dislocations and phase diagrams — and is answered as such below.

Reference texts. The answers below are keyed to the works normally recommended for this syllabus code:


Question III: Crystal Structure I (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Check
The paper says "hexagonal cubic unit cells", which is not a standard crystallographic term. Read together with the index style of each item, the intended split is clear: 3-index items (a, c) are cubic-system notation, so they are drawn in a simple cubic cell; 4-index items (b, d) are Miller–Bravais notation, exclusive to the hexagonal system, so they are drawn in a hexagonal (HCP-type) cell. That pairing is used below.

III.1(a, c) — [111] Direction and (132) Plane in a Simple Cubic Cell

+x+y+zO (0,0,0)[111]1/31/2(132) plane
Fig. III.1(a,c) — the [111] direction (red, corner-to-corner body diagonal) and the (132) plane (blue, intercepting the axes at $x=1$, $y=1/3$, $z=1/2$) in a simple cubic unit cell.

[111] direction. Starting at the origin, the vector travels one full lattice translation along each of $+x$, $+y$, $+z$ — i.e. straight along the cube's body diagonal to the opposite corner $(1,1,1)$, drawn as the red arrow above.

(132) plane. Miller indices $(hkl)=(132)$ mean the plane intercepts the axes at $1/h=1$, $1/k=1/3$, $1/l=1/2$ (in units of the cell edge $a$) — the shaded blue triangle above, connecting $(1,0,0)$, $(0,\tfrac13,0)$ and $(0,0,\tfrac12)$.

III.1(b, d) — $[1\bar{2}10]$ Direction and $(\bar{2}\bar{2}10)$ Plane in a Hexagonal Cell

a₁a₂c120° between a₁, a₂ (schematic)[1 2̅ 1 0] ≡ −3×(primitive −a₂ step)
Fig. III.1(b,d) — the rhombic-prism hexagonal unit cell ($a_1$, $a_2$, $c$; $a_3=-(a_1+a_2)$ not drawn), with the reduced $[1\bar2 10]$ direction (red).

$[1\bar{2}10]$ direction. For a Miller–Bravais direction $[uvtw]$ the real-space vector reduces to $U\,a_1+V\,a_2+W\,c$ with $U=u-t$, $V=v-t$, $W=w$. Here $u=1,\ v=-2,\ t=1,\ w=0$ (consistent, since $u+v+t=1-2+1=0$ as required), giving $U=0$, $V=-3$, $W=0$: the vector is purely along $-a_2$, with $\gcd(0,3,0)=3$, so the written index is exactly 3 primitive $-a_2$ lattice steps, not a single primitive step (drawn above as the direction line, with the reduction noted).

$(\bar{2}\bar{2}10)$ plane. A valid Miller–Bravais plane $(hkil)$ requires $i=-(h+k)$. Here $h=-2$, $k=-2$ give $i=-(-2-2)=4$, but the printed third index is $1$ — the same class of printing error as in Question I.2 (the Cl atomic number). Taking the self-consistent correction $i=4$, the plane is $(\bar2\bar24\,0)$, which reduces (dividing by 2) to $(\bar1\bar120)$: since $l=0$, this is a prism-type plane, parallel to the $c$-axis, of the $\{10\bar10\}$ family (the standard side faces of the hexagonal prism).

III.2 — FCC vs. HCP Stacking Sequence

Both FCC and HCP are close-packed structures built from identical close-packed atomic planes (each atom touching 6 neighbours within its own plane, packing factor 0.74), and differ only in how successive planes are stacked. HCP repeats every second plane directly above the first: ABABAB…, so the third layer sits exactly above the first. FCC instead repeats only every third plane: ABCABC…, with the third layer occupying a third distinct set of interstitial positions before the pattern returns to A. Both stackings achieve the same maximum packing density, but the different stacking periodicity is what gives FCC its cubic (rather than hexagonal) symmetry and its larger number of independent close-packed planes (4 × {111} in FCC vs. a single (0001) basal plane in HCP) — directly relevant to Question VI.2(b)'s FCC slip-system count.

III.3 — Theoretical Density of GaAs

Given. Zinc blende structure (4 formula units GaAs per unit cell, same atom count as diamond cubic); $a=0.565$ nm; $M_{Ga}=69.72$ g/mol, $M_{As}=74.91$ g/mol.

Find. Theoretical density $\rho$.

Approach. Apply the appendix relation $\rho=\dfrac{n\cdot A_{wt}}{V_c\cdot N_A}$ with $n=4$ and $A_{wt}=M_{Ga}+M_{As}$ (mass of one GaAs formula unit).

  1. Unit cell volume. $$V_c=a^3=(5.65\times10^{-8}\,\text{cm})^3=1.8036\times10^{-22}\ \text{cm}^3$$
  2. Formula-unit mass and density. $$A_{wt}=69.72+74.91=144.63\ \text{g/mol}, \qquad n=4$$ $$\rho=\frac{4(144.63)}{(1.8036\times10^{-22})(6.023\times10^{23})}=\frac{578.52}{108.63}=\boxed{5.33\ \text{g/cm}^3}$$
Question III — summary
ItemResult
III.1(a) [111] direction, cubicbody diagonal, $(0,0,0)\to(1,1,1)$
III.1(c) (132) plane, cubicintercepts $x{=}1,\ y{=}1/3,\ z{=}1/2$
III.1(b) $[1\bar2 10]$, hexagonal$\equiv -3\times$ primitive $-a_2$ step
III.1(d) $(\bar2\bar210)$, hexagonalself-consistent as $(\bar1\bar120)$, a $\{10\bar10\}$ prism plane
III.3 GaAs theoretical density$5.33$ g/cm³