NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

21-Mat-A4 Deformation Behaviour and Properties of Materials · December 2018

Question 5 of 7: Microstructural Characterization

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. National Exams, December 2018 — 10-Met-A4, Structure of Materials. Three hours, closed book, one approved calculator (Casio or Sharp). Seven questions of 20 marks each (Roman numerals I–VII); the rubric asks for any five, with only the first five in the answer book marked. All seven are solved here, because this set is a study resource rather than an exam script. All necessary equations, constants and an error-function table are provided in the exam's own appendix (reproduced where used below).

Note on the exam title. The printed exam header reads 10-Met-A4, Structure of Materials. Only Question VI.2(c) (grain-size strengthening) touches mechanical/deformation properties directly; the paper as a whole is a broad introductory materials-science survey — atomic structure, bonding, crystal structure/directions/planes, point defects, XRD, dislocations and phase diagrams — and is answered as such below.

Reference texts. The answers below are keyed to the works normally recommended for this syllabus code:


Question V: Microstructural Characterization (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

V.1(a, b) — Crystal Structure and Lattice Constant from XRD

Given. $2\theta$ peaks at 40°, 58°, 73°, 86.8°, 100.4°, 114.7°; $\lambda=0.154$ nm.

Find. (a) BCC or FCC; (b) lattice constant $a$.

Approach. Compute $\sin^2\theta$ for each peak and form the ratio to the first peak's value. For a cubic structure, $\sin^2\theta \propto h^2+k^2+l^2$, and the two structures give characteristically different ratio sequences: BCC (only $h+k+l$ even reflect) gives ratios $1:2:3:4:5:6:7:8\dots$; FCC ($h,k,l$ all-even or all-odd) gives $1:1.33:2.67:3.67:4:5.33\dots$. Once the structure is identified, Bragg's law $n\lambda=2d\sin\theta$ with $d=a/\sqrt{h^2+k^2+l^2}$ gives $a$ from each peak.

  1. $\sin^2\theta$ and ratios.
    XRD peak analysis
    $2\theta$ (°)$\theta$ (°)$\sin^2\theta$Ratio to peak 1Nearest integer
    40.020.00.11701.0001
    58.029.00.23502.0092
    73.036.50.35383.0253
    86.843.40.47214.0364
    100.450.20.59035.0465
    114.757.350.70896.0606
    The ratio sequence $1:2:3:4:5:6$ matches the BCC pattern exactly (FCC's $1:1.33:2.67:\ldots$ sequence is not seen anywhere in the data), so: $$\boxed{\text{Crystal structure: BCC}}$$ with successive peaks indexed $h^2{+}k^2{+}l^2=2,4,6,8,10,12$, i.e. (110), (200), (211), (220), (310), (222).
  2. Lattice constant from each peak. $d=\lambda/(2\sin\theta)$, then $a=d\sqrt{h^2+k^2+l^2}$:
    Lattice constant per reflection
    $hkl$$h^2{+}k^2{+}l^2$$d$ (nm)$a$ (nm)
    (110)20.22520.3184
    (200)40.15900.3177
    (211)60.12960.3171
    (220)80.11230.3170
    (310)100.10040.3169
    (222)120.09160.3168
    Averaging all six (self-consistent to within 0.5%): $$\boxed{a \approx 0.317\ \text{nm}}$$
Check
The recovered lattice constant ($a\approx0.317$ nm, BCC) is close to tungsten's published value ($a=0.3165$ nm) — a plausible identity for this element, though the question only asks for structure type and lattice constant, not elemental identification, so this is offered as a sanity check rather than a required answer.

V.2 — SEM vs. TEM

SEM vs. TEM comparison
AspectScanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)
(a) Physical principleA finely focused beam is rastered across the sample surface; secondary and backscattered electrons emitted from near the surface are collected to build a point-by-point image.A beam is transmitted through an ultra-thin sample; the transmitted/diffracted electrons form a projected image of the internal structure, much like X-ray radiography.
(b) Typical accelerating energy$\sim$1–30 keV$\sim$100–300 keV (much higher, needed to penetrate the sample)
(c) Resolution / magnification$\sim$1–20 nm resolution; up to $\sim$50,000×$\sim$0.1–0.2 nm (near-atomic) resolution; up to $\sim$1,000,000×

(d) Only TEM can reveal sub-surface dislocation activity in a metallic thin sample — SEM images only the surface (or near-surface, via secondary electrons), whereas TEM's transmitted-beam geometry images the full thickness of the electron-transparent foil, so dislocations, stacking faults and precipitates throughout the sample's volume produce diffraction contrast directly visible in the image (this is precisely how dislocation densities and slip activity are studied experimentally, tying back to Question VI's dislocation content).