22-Mec-A1 Applied Thermodynamics and Heat Transfer · May 2016
Question 5 of 8: Insulation Thickness to Cut a Steam-Tube Heat Loss
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Reference texts: Çengel & Boles, Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach (9th ed., McGraw-Hill) — closed- and open-system energy balances, steam tables, vapour and gas power cycles, and vapour-compression refrigeration; Çengel & Ghajar, Heat and Mass Transfer (6th ed.) and Incropera, DeWitt, Bergman & Lavine, Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer (8th ed., Wiley) — cylindrical composite-wall conduction, internal-flow and cross-flow convection correlations, natural convection with radiation, and the ε–NTU heat-exchanger method. Freon-12 property data are taken from the appendix supplied with the exam; steam, air and engine-oil data from standard tables.
Paper format: National Examination 07-Mec-A1, 3 hours, open book. Part A — Thermodynamics (Q1–4); Part B — Heat Transfer (Q5–8). Each answer carries equal value; a complete paper is any five (three from one part, two from the other). All eight questions are solved in full below.
Question 5: Insulation Thickness to Cut a Steam-Tube Heat Loss (equal value)
Figure 5 — Radial resistance network: the (negligible) copper conduction, then insulation conduction $\ln(r_3/r_2)/2\pi k$, then the outer convective film $1/2\pi r_3 h$, all in series between the 100 °C inner surface and the 27 °C room.
Given. A copper tube (OD 2.54 cm, wall 0.54 cm) with a 100 °C inner surface in a 27 °C room, cooled by forced convection h = 55 W/m²·°C, to be lagged with k = 0.0875 W/m·°C insulation. Find. The insulation thickness that cuts the loss by 95 %, and the resulting outer-surface temperature.
Approach. Compute the bare-tube loss, target 5 % of it, then solve the series cylindrical-resistance equation for the outer insulation radius; the surface temperature follows from the convective leg.
Bare-tube heat loss (per metre). Copper is nearly isothermal, so the outer surface sits at ~100 °C and $$q'_\text{bare}=h(2\pi r_2)(T_i-T_\infty)=55(2\pi\cdot0.0127)(73)=320\ \text{W/m}.$$
Target loss. A 95 % reduction leaves $q'_\text{ins}=0.05(320)=16.0$ W/m.
Check the critical radius. $r_c=k/h=0.0875/55=1.6$ mm $
Solve for the outer radius. Setting $q'_\text{ins}=\dfrac{T_i-T_\infty}{\dfrac{\ln(r_3/r_2)}{2\pi k}+\dfrac{1}{2\pi r_3 h}}=16.0$ W/m and iterating gives $r_3=0.154$ m, so $$\text{thickness}=r_3-r_2=0.154-0.0127=\boxed{0.141\ \text{m}\approx14.1\ \text{cm}}.$$
Outside surface temperature. From the convective leg at $r_3$, $$T_o=T_\infty+\frac{q'_\text{ins}}{2\pi r_3 h}=27+\frac{16.0}{2\pi(0.154)(55)}=\boxed{27.3\,{}^\circ\text{C}}.$$
Check
The thick (14 cm) blanket is a direct consequence of the low-conductivity insulation and the demanding 95 % cut on a small pipe; with the surface now only 0.3 °C above ambient, essentially the entire 73 °C drop occurs across the insulation. The copper wall resistance ($\sim10^{-4}$ m·K/W) is four orders below the insulation resistance and is rightly neglected.