22-Mec-A4 Design and Manufacture of Machine Elements · May 2018
Question 5 of 6: Long-shoe external drum brake - maximum pressure, torque and power
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Examination 16-Mec-A4, Design and Manufacture of Machine Elements, May 2018. Three hours, open book, non-communicating calculator permitted. Six questions in two parts: Part A (Q1-Q3, manufacturing processes) and Part B (Q4-Q6, machine-element design). Candidates answer two questions from each part; four questions constitute a complete paper and all questions carry equal value (25 % each). All six questions are worked here.
Reference texts for this subject.
S. Kalpakjian and S. R. Schmid, Manufacturing Engineering and Technology, 8th ed. (polymer processing: thermoforming, compression and transfer moulding, extrusion and die swell).
M. P. Groover, Fundamentals of Modern Manufacturing: Materials, Processes and Systems, 7th ed. (shaping processes for plastics).
R. G. Budynas and J. K. Nisbett, Shigley's Mechanical Engineering Design, 10th ed. (Ch. 5 failure prevention, Ch. 9 welded joints, Ch. 16 brakes and clutches).
R. C. Hibbeler, Mechanics of Materials, 10th ed. (combined loading, transverse shear).
CSA S16 / CSA G40.21 for Canadian structural steel grades; ASTM A36 is quoted in Q4 as printed on the paper, and the Canadian equivalent 300W is noted where it matters.
Check: Part B is figure-driven; every dimension used below was read from the printed figures. Where a figure is not dimensionally self-consistent (Q5, the drum is drawn oversized relative to the lever dimensions) the reading adopted and its effect on the answer are stated explicitly in that question.
Question 5: Long-shoe external drum brake - maximum pressure, torque and power
Find. (a) the maximum lining pressure $p_{a}$; (b) the braking torque and the power the brake can absorb at 250 rpm.
Figure 5.1 - Geometry of the external contracting shoe. The lining angles are measured from the drum-centre-to-hinge-pin line OA, not from the vertical.
Approach. Treat the shoe as a long shoe: the lining pressure varies as the sine of the angle measured from the hinge-pin line, so the normal and friction tractions are integrated over the arc, moments are taken about the pin to find the peak pressure from the actuating force, and the friction moment about the drum axis then gives the torque.
Locate the hinge pin relative to the drum centre. The pin sits 155 mm to the left of the drum axis and above it; scaling the drawing gives the pin line at $\alpha = 55^\circ$ from the vertical, so$$a = \frac{155}{\sin 55^\circ} = 189.2\ \text{mm}$$This distance $a$ is the moment arm of the whole traction system about the pin, and it is the one quantity that must be extracted from the figure rather than read off a dimension.
Convert the lining arc to angles measured from the pin line. The lining runs from 45° on one side of the vertical to 45° on the other, and the pin line is 55° from the vertical, so$$\theta_{1} = \alpha - 45^\circ = 10^\circ, \qquad \theta_{2} = \alpha + 45^\circ = 100^\circ$$Since $\theta_{2} > 90^\circ$, the maximum of $\sin\theta$ falls inside the lining, so the pressure peaks at $\theta_{a} = 90^\circ$ and $\sin\theta_{a} = 1$. Taking $\theta_{a} = \theta_{2}$ here would be the standard error.
Pressure distribution. The shoe is rigid and pivots about A, so the normal approach of the lining to the drum, and hence the pressure, varies as$$p(\theta) = p_{a}\,\frac{\sin\theta}{\sin\theta_{a}} = p_{a}\sin\theta$$with $\theta$ measured from OA. The pressure is a tenth of its peak at the leading edge and falls only to 98 % of the peak at the trailing edge.
Moment of the normal tractions about the pin. Integrating $dN = p\,b\,r\,d\theta$ with its moment arm $a\sin\theta$ about A,$$M_{N} = \frac{p_{a}br a}{\sin\theta_{a}}\int_{\theta_{1}}^{\theta_{2}}\sin^{2}\theta\,d\theta = p_{a}(75)(150)(189.2)(0.9564) = 2.036\times10^{6}\,p_{a}$$in N·mm with $p_{a}$ in MPa.
Moment of the friction tractions about the pin. Each friction element $dF = f\,dN$ acts tangentially, with moment arm $(r - a\cos\theta)$ about A:$$M_{F} = \frac{f p_{a}br}{\sin\theta_{a}}\int_{\theta_{1}}^{\theta_{2}} \sin\theta\,(r - a\cos\theta)\,d\theta = f p_{a}br\left[r(1.1585) - a(0.4698)\right]$$$$M_{F} = 0.4\,p_{a}(75)(150)\left[150(1.1585) - 189.2(0.4698)\right] = 0.382\times10^{6}\,p_{a}$$
Decide the sense of the friction moment. The drum turns counter-clockwise, so at the lining - which lies above the drum axis - the drum surface sweeps towards the pin. Taking moments about A shows that this friction moment acts in the same sense as the normal-traction moment, i.e. it resists the applied moment: the shoe is de-energising. The equilibrium of the shoe is therefore$$F_{a}c = M_{N} + M_{F}$$Had the drum turned the other way the friction moment would subtract, the shoe would be self-energising, and the same actuating force would produce a much higher pressure.
Maximum pressure. Substituting $F_{a}c = 5000(405) = 2.025\times10^{6}$ N·mm,$$p_{a} = \frac{F_{a}c}{M_{N}+M_{F}} = \frac{2.025\times10^{6}}{(2.036+0.382)\times10^{6}} = \boxed{0.838\ \text{MPa}}$$which is comfortably within the 1.0-1.7 MPa allowable of a moulded or woven asbestos-free lining.
Braking torque. Every friction element acts at the constant radius $r$ about the drum axis, so the integral carries $\sin\theta$ rather than $\sin^{2}\theta$:$$T = \frac{f p_{a} b r^{2}(\cos\theta_{1}-\cos\theta_{2})}{\sin\theta_{a}} = 0.4(0.838)(75)(150)^{2}\left[\cos 10^\circ - \cos 100^\circ\right]$$$$T = 0.4(0.838)(75)(22\,500)(0.9848+0.1736) = 654.9\times10^{3}\ \text{N}\cdot\text{mm} = \boxed{655\ \text{N}\cdot\text{m}}$$
Power capacity. With $\omega = 2\pi(250)/60 = 26.18$ rad/s,$$\dot{W} = T\omega = 654.9(26.18) = 17.15\times10^{3}\ \text{W} = \boxed{17.1\ \text{kW}}$$This is the instantaneous rate at which the brake converts mechanical energy to heat at rated speed; continuous operation at this level would require the drum surface to dissipate about 0.5 MW/m2 and would not be sustainable without forced cooling.
Figure 5.2 - Lining pressure distribution. The peak falls at $\theta = 90^\circ$, inside the lining, because $\theta_{2}$ exceeds 90°.
Check: Two readings were taken from the figure rather than from a printed dimension. (i) The vertical offset of the hinge pin is not dimensioned; scaling the drawing gives the pin line at 55° from the vertical, hence $a = 189$ mm, $\theta_{1} = 10^\circ$ and $\theta_{2} = 100^\circ$. Adopting instead a 45° pin line (which would give the tidier $\theta_{1}=0^\circ$, $\theta_{2}=90^\circ$ and $a = 219$ mm) changes the maximum pressure to 0.956 MPa but changes the torque only to 645 N·m and the power to 20.3 kW - so the torque and power answers are insensitive to this reading, while the pressure carries about 14 % uncertainty. (ii) The drum in the source figure is drawn about a third oversized relative to the 155 mm and 250 mm lever dimensions, so the drawing is not to a single scale; the printed dimensions have been used throughout, and only the pin-line angle was scaled. (iii) The rotation arrow is counter-clockwise, giving the de-energising case solved above; if the drum were reversed the same 5 kN would produce $p_{a} = 1.22$ MPa and 957 N·m.