Question 5 of 6: Dimensional Analysis of a Sudden Contraction
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format: National Exams – May 2017, 16-Mec-A6 Advanced Fluid Mechanics. Open book, 3 hours. Six questions of equal value (20 marks); any five constitute a complete paper. All six are solved here as a study resource.
Reference texts: Fox, Pritchard & McDonald, Introduction to Fluid Mechanics, 10th ed.; F. M. White, Fluid Mechanics, 8th ed.; J. D. Anderson, Modern Compressible Flow, 3rd ed. (Q1); I. G. Currie, Fundamental Mechanics of Fluids (Q2); Munson, Young & Okiishi, Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics (Q5).
Note on the subject. The 16-Mec-A6 sittings (2017–2019) are the Advanced Fluid Mechanics syllabus — compressible flow, potential flow, integral momentum, lubrication theory, dimensional analysis and boundary layers — a different exam from the 07-Mec-A6 pump/turbine papers.
Question 5: Dimensional Analysis of a Sudden Contraction (20 marks)
Given. $\Delta p=f(D_1,\,D_2,\,U,\,\rho,\,\mu)$ — six variables in three primary dimensions (M, L, T); repeating variables $D_1$, $U$, $\mu$.
Find. (a) a complete set of dimensionless $\Pi$ groups; (b) the reason $U_2$ is not an independent variable.
Approach. Count variables and dimensions ($6-3=3$ groups), check that the repeating set spans M, L, T, then form each $\Pi$ by combining one non-repeating variable with powers of the repeating set and solving for zero net dimensions.
Variables and dimensions. $[\Delta p]=ML^{-1}T^{-2}$, $[D_1]=[D_2]=L$, $[U]=LT^{-1}$, $[\rho]=ML^{-3}$, $[\mu]=ML^{-1}T^{-1}$. The repeating trio $D_1,U,\mu$ carries L (from $D_1$), T (from $U$) and M (from $\mu$), so it is dimensionally independent. Buckingham gives $6-3=3$ groups.
Group with $\Delta p$. $\Pi_1=\Delta p\,D_1^{a}U^{b}\mu^{c}$; requiring $M,L,T$ exponents to vanish gives $c=-1,\ b=-1,\ a=1$:
$$\Pi_1=\frac{\Delta p\,D_1}{\mu\,U}.$$
Group with $D_2$. $\Pi_2=D_2 D_1^{a}U^{b}\mu^{c}\Rightarrow c=0,\ b=0,\ a=-1$:
$$\Pi_2=\frac{D_2}{D_1}\quad(\text{diameter ratio}).$$
Group with $\rho$. $\Pi_3=\rho\,D_1^{a}U^{b}\mu^{c}\Rightarrow c=-1,\ b=1,\ a=1$:
$$\Pi_3=\frac{\rho\,U D_1}{\mu}=Re\quad(\text{Reynolds number}).$$
Hence
$$\boxed{\frac{\Delta p\,D_1}{\mu U}=\phi\!\left(\frac{D_2}{D_1},\ \frac{\rho U D_1}{\mu}\right).}$$
Recombining $\Pi_1/\Pi_3$ recovers the more familiar pressure coefficient: $\dfrac{\Delta p}{\rho U^{2}}=\phi'\!\left(\dfrac{D_2}{D_1},\,Re\right)$.
(b) Why not include $U_2$. The velocity in the smaller pipe is not independent: incompressible continuity fixes it, $U_2=U\,(D_1/D_2)^2$. It is already determined by the two variables $U$ and $D_2/D_1$ that are in the list, so adding it would not introduce new physical information. Including a dependent variable violates the Buckingham requirement that the chosen quantities be independent; it would merely generate a redundant group ($U_2/U=(D_1/D_2)^2$) that is a pure function of $\Pi_2$, over-counting the physics rather than describing it.