22-Mec-A7 Advanced Strength of Materials · December 2013
Question 1 of 7: Two-Segment Rod — Uniform Heating Between Rigid Supports
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format: National Exams, December 2013 — 07-Mech-A7 Advanced Strength of Materials. Open-book, 3 hours; any five of the seven problems constitute a complete paper and all problems are of equal value. All seven problems are solved as a study resource.
Reference texts. R.C. Hibbeler, Mechanics of Materials, 10th ed. (thermal & indeterminate axial members Ch. 4, plane stress/strain Ch. 9–10, energy methods Ch. 14); A.P. Boresi & R.J. Schmidt, Advanced Mechanics of Materials, 6th ed. (thick-walled cylinders Ch. 11, thin-walled open sections & torsional buckling Ch. 6&12); J.M. Gere & B.J. Goodno, Mechanics of Materials (strain rosettes, columns). Yield criteria follow the von Mises and Tresca formulations standard to these texts.
Question 1: Two-Segment Rod — Uniform Heating Between Rigid Supports (20 marks)
Find. (a) the axial stresses σ1, σ2; (b) the direction and magnitude of the displacement of the welded joint B.
Series rod fixed at A and C; heating induces a common internal force N (statically indeterminate).
Approach. The two rods carry the same internal force N (series equilibrium). Because both ends are held, the free thermal growth plus the mechanical (force) deformation of the pair must sum to zero — one compatibility equation gives N, hence the stresses; the motion of B is the net stretch of rod 1.
Compatibility of the constrained pair. Free thermal expansion is cancelled by the flexibility of the two segments under the common force N:
$$\alpha_1L_1\,\Delta T+\alpha_2L_2\,\Delta T+N\!\left(\frac{L_1}{A_1E_1}+\frac{L_2}{A_2E_2}\right)=0.$$
Internal force. Solving,
$$\boxed{N=-\frac{0.1215}{2.824\times10^{-6}}=-43.0\ \text{kN}}$$
negative ⇒ the constrained heating puts the rod pair into compression.
Axial stresses (part a). The same force divides by each area:
$$\sigma_1=\frac{N}{A_1}=\frac{-43\,025}{520}=-82.7\ \text{MPa},\qquad \sigma_2=\frac{N}{A_2}=\frac{-43\,025}{950}=-45.3\ \text{MPa}.$$
Both are compressive, the smaller-area rod (1) being the more highly stressed.
Motion of joint B (part b). Measuring displacement positive toward C (right), B moves by the net elongation of rod 1:
$$u_B=\alpha_1L_1\Delta T+N\frac{L_1}{A_1E_1}=0.0540-0.0736=\boxed{-0.0195\ \text{mm}}$$
The negative sign means B moves to the left by about 0.020 mm: rod 1 — the stiffer, lower-expansion segment — is compressed more than it thermally grows, so the weld is pulled back toward A. (Checking from the C side, rod 2's net change is +0.0195 mm, confirming the closure uA=uC=0.)