NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

22-Mec-B6 Advanced Fluid Mechanics · May 2013

Question 2 of 6: Question 2 (Part A, Question A2): Skin-Friction Drag and Power for a Super-Tanker

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. National Exams, May 2013 — 07-Mec-B6 Advanced Fluid Mechanics. Three hours, open book, any non-communicating calculator permitted. Part A holds three questions of 20 marks each (40 per cent of the paper) and Part B three questions of 30 marks each (60 per cent); the candidate answers any two in each part. All six questions are worked here, because the set is a study resource rather than a three-hour sitting. The paper supplies an aid sheet of compressible-flow, boundary-layer, Navier–Stokes and potential-flow relations, and the coefficients quoted below are taken from that sheet so that the arithmetic matches what a candidate had in front of them.

Reference texts.

Question 2 (Part A, Question A2): Skin-Friction Drag and Power for a Super-Tanker (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given.

QuantitySymbolValue
Hull length (streamwise)L360 m
Beam (width of the flat bottom)B70 m
Draft (depth of each side face)T25 m
Ship speedU24 km/h = 6.6667 m/s
Sea-water densityρ1020 kg/m3
Kinematic viscosityν1.37 × 10−6 m2/s
Transition Reynolds numberRex,tr3 × 105
Aid-sheet local coefficientsCfx0.67 Rex−1/2 (laminar); 0.0266 Rex−1/7 (turbulent)

Find. The total skin-friction force on the wetted hull and the propulsive power needed to overcome it.

free surfacehull sectionB = 70 mT = 25 mwetted perimeter (red)A = 43 200 square metresflow along the hull (developing boundary layer)L = 360 mturbulenttransition: Re = 3 x 10^5 at x = 62 mmlaminarUSkin friction acts on the flat bottom and both sides;the bow wave and form drag are excluded here.
Figure 2.1 — Left: transverse section, with the wetted flat bottom and the two side faces marked in red. Right: the boundary layer along the hull, laminar over the first few centimetres and turbulent thereafter (vertical scale greatly exaggerated).

Approach. Treat the wetted bottom and the two sides as flat plates of length L in a stream of speed U, integrate the aid-sheet local friction coefficient along the plate in two pieces — laminar up to the transition point, then the 1/7-law turbulent form — to obtain a mean coefficient, and convert that to force and power.

  1. Wetted area and free-stream speed. The flat bottom contributes $B L$ and each of the two vertical sides contributes $T L$, so $$A_w = BL + 2TL = (70)(360) + 2(25)(360) = 25{,}200 + 18{,}000 = 43,200\ \text{m}^{2}$$ and the ship speed converts to $U = 24\ \text{km/h} \div 3.6 = 6.6667$ m/s.
  2. Reynolds numbers and the transition point. Over the full hull length $$Re_L = \frac{U L}{\nu} = \frac{(6.6667)(360)}{1.37\times 10^{-6}} = 1.752 \times 10^{9}$$ and transition occurs where $Re_x = 3\times10^{5}$, that is at $$x_{tr} = \frac{Re_{x,tr}\,\nu}{U} = \frac{(3\times10^{5})(1.37\times10^{-6})}{6.6667} = 0.06165\ \text{m}$$ Transition is complete within the first 62 mm of a 360 m hull, so the layer is turbulent over essentially the whole ship; the laminar piece is retained anyway because the question asks for a naturally developing layer.
  3. Mean friction coefficient, laminar portion. The mean coefficient is the length average of the local one, $C_F = (1/L)\int_0^L C_{fx}\,\mathrm{d}x$. Over the laminar run the aid sheet gives $C_{fx} = 0.67\,Re_x^{-1/2}$, and since $Re_x^{-1/2} = (\nu / U x)^{1/2}$ the integral is elementary: $$\int_0^{x_{tr}} 0.67\left(\frac{\nu}{Ux}\right)^{1/2}\mathrm{d}x = 1.34\,\frac{x_{tr}}{\sqrt{Re_{x,tr}}} = 1.34\,\frac{0.06165}{547.7} = 1.5083 \times 10^{-4}\ \text{m}$$
  4. Mean friction coefficient, turbulent portion. With $C_{fx} = 0.0266\,Re_x^{-1/7}$ the same integration from the transition point to the stern gives $$\int_{x_{tr}}^{L} 0.0266\left(\frac{\nu}{Ux}\right)^{1/7}\mathrm{d}x = \frac{7}{6}(0.0266)\left[L\,Re_L^{-1/7} - x_{tr}\,Re_{x,tr}^{-1/7}\right]$$ Substituting $Re_L^{-1/7} = 0.04781$ and $Re_{x,tr}^{-1/7} = 0.16503$ yields $0.5338$ m. Dividing the sum of the two pieces by the hull length, $$C_F = \frac{0.00015 + 0.5338}{360} = \boxed{1.4832 \times 10^{-3}}$$ The laminar strip supplies only about 0.03 per cent of the total, so an all-turbulent estimate $C_F = \tfrac{7}{6}(0.0266)Re_L^{-1/7} = 0.00148$ differs by less than a tenth of a per cent — a reassuring cross-check.
  5. Skin-friction force. The dynamic pressure is $q = \tfrac12\rho U^{2} = \tfrac12(1020)(6.6667)^{2} = 22,667$ Pa, and the drag follows directly from the definition of the mean coefficient: $$F_D = C_F\,\tfrac12 \rho U^{2} A_w = (0.001483)(22,667)(43,200) = \boxed{1,452\ \text{kN}}$$ that is about 1.45 MN, equivalent to the weight of roughly 148 tonnes.
  6. Propulsive power. The power delivered against a steady drag force is the product of force and speed: $$P = F_D\,U = (1,452,336\ \text{N})(6.6667\ \text{m/s}) = \boxed{9.68\ \text{MW}}$$ This is the effective power needed for skin friction alone; a real tanker also pays for wave-making and form drag and for propulsive inefficiency, so the installed shaft power would be appreciably larger.

Check: the calculation assumes the three wetted faces behave as smooth flat plates with a boundary layer starting fresh at the bow on each, that the bilge curvature, the bow and stern regions, appendages and hull roughness add nothing, and that wave-making drag is excluded — exactly the idealisation the question specifies. A fouled or riveted hull can easily double the friction coefficient, which is why service allowances are applied in practice.

Final Results.

QuantitySymbolValue
Wetted areaAw43,200 m2
Ship speedU6.6667 m/s (24 km/h)
Length Reynolds numberReL1.752e+09
Transition locationxtr0.0616 m (62 mm)
Mean friction coefficientCF1.4832e-03
Skin-friction forceFD1,452 kN (1.45 MN)
Power to overcome skin frictionP9.68 MW